Literature DB >> 24347046

Risk factors for revision within 10 years of total knee arthroplasty.

Christopher J Dy1, Robert G Marx, Kevin J Bozic, Ting Jung Pan, Douglas E Padgett, Stephen Lyman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An in-depth understanding of risk factors for revision TKA is needed to minimize the burden of revision surgery. Previous studies indicate that hospital and community characteristics may influence outcomes after TKA, but a detailed investigation in a diverse population is warranted to identify opportunities for quality improvement. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked: (1) What is the frequency of revision TKA within 10 years of primary arthroplasty? (2) Which patient demographic factors are associated with revision within 10 years of TKA? (3) Which community and institutional characteristics are associated with revision within 10 years of TKA?
METHODS: We identified 301,955 patients who underwent primary TKAs in New York or California from 1997 to 2005 from statewide databases. Identifier codes were used to determine whether they underwent revision TKA. Patient, community, and hospital characteristics were analyzed using multivariable regression modeling to determine predictors for revision.
RESULTS: The frequency of revision was 4.0% at 5 years after the index arthroplasty and 8.9% at 9-years. Patients between 50 and 75 years old had a lower risk of revision than patients younger than 50 years (hazard ratio [HR], 0.47; 95% CI, 0.44, 0.50). Black patients were at increased risk for needing revision surgery (HR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.29, 1.49) after adjustment for insurance type, poverty level, and education. Women (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.79, 0.86) and Medicare recipients (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.79, 0.86) were less likely to undergo revision surgery, whereas those from the most educated (HR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.02, 1.16) and the poorest communities (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.01, 1.15) had modest increases in risk of revision. Mid-volume hospitals (200-400 annual cases) had a reduction of early revision (HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.83, 0.99) compared with those performing less than 200 cases annually, whereas higher-volume hospitals (greater than 400 cases) showed little effect compared with low-volume hospitals.
CONCLUSIONS: Patient, community, and institutional characteristics affect the risk for revision within 10 years of index TKA. These data can be used to develop process improvement and implant surveillance strategies among high-risk patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study. See the Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24347046      PMCID: PMC3940740          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-013-3416-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  37 in total

1.  Variation in perceptions of treatment and self-care practices in elderly with osteoarthritis: a comparison between African American and white patients.

Authors:  S A Ibrahim; L A Siminoff; C J Burant; C K Kwoh
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2001-08

2.  Survivorship analysis of total knee arthroplasty. Cumulative rates of survival of 9200 total knee arthroplasties.

Authors:  J A Rand; D M Ilstrup
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Overcoming the absence of socioeconomic data in medical records: validation and application of a census-based methodology.

Authors:  N Krieger
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data.

Authors:  A Elixhauser; C Steiner; D R Harris; R M Coffey
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register 1975-1997: an update with special emphasis on 41,223 knees operated on in 1988-1997.

Authors:  O Robertsson; K Knutson; S Lewold; L Lidgren
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2001-10

6.  Flat-on-flat, nonconstrained, compression molded polyethylene total knee replacement.

Authors:  M A Ritter; R Worland; J Saliski; J V Helphenstine; K L Edmondson; E M Keating; P M Faris; J B Meding
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Race- and ethnicity-specific characteristics of participants lost to follow-up in a telephone cohort.

Authors:  B M Psaty; A Cheadle; T D Koepsell; P Diehr; T Wickizer; S Curry; M VonKorff; E B Perrin; D C Pearson; E H Wagner
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1994-07-15       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Ten to fourteen year survival and functional analysis of the AGC total knee replacement system.

Authors:  Richard L Worland; Gonzalo Vazquez-Vela Johnson; Jose Alemparte; Douglas E Jessup; Jonathan Keenan; Nelson Norambuena; Gonzalo Johnson
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Association between hospital and surgeon procedure volume and the outcomes of total knee replacement.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Katz; Jane Barrett; Nizar N Mahomed; John A Baron; R John Wright; Elena Losina
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Racial, ethnic, and geographic disparities in rates of knee arthroplasty among Medicare patients.

Authors:  Jonathan Skinner; James N Weinstein; Scott M Sporer; John E Wennberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-10-02       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  32 in total

Review 1.  Larger range of motion and increased return to activity, but higher revision rates following unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty in patients under 65: a systematic review.

Authors:  Laura J Kleeblad; Jelle P van der List; Hendrik A Zuiderbaan; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Are TKAs Performed in High-volume Hospitals Less Likely to Undergo Revision Than TKAs Performed in Low-volume Hospitals?

Authors:  Elke Jeschke; Mustafa Citak; Christian Günster; Andreas Matthias Halder; Karl-Dieter Heller; Jürgen Malzahn; Fritz Uwe Niethard; Peter Schräder; Josef Zacher; Thorsten Gehrke
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Editor's Spotlight/Take 5: Is changing hospitals for revision total joint arthroplasty associated with more complications?

Authors:  Stephen Lyman; Seth S Leopold
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Systemic sclerosis is associated with knee arthroplasty outcomes: a National US study.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh; John D Cleveland
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  CORR Insights®: Are TKAs Performed in High-volume Hospitals Less Likely to Undergo Revision Than TKAs Performed in Low-volume Hospitals?

Authors:  Frederic Picard
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Lifetime medical costs of knee osteoarthritis management in the United States: impact of extending indications for total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Elena Losina; A David Paltiel; Alexander M Weinstein; Edward Yelin; David J Hunter; Stephanie P Chen; Kristina Klara; Lisa G Suter; Daniel H Solomon; Sara A Burbine; Rochelle P Walensky; Jeffrey N Katz
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.794

7.  Racial Disparities in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Analysis of 125,901 Patients in National US Private Payer Database.

Authors:  Martin Roche; Tsun Yee Law; Assem A Sultan; Erica Umpierrez; Anton Khlopas; Sam Rosas; Jennifer Kurowicki; Kevin Wang; Michael A Mont
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2018-06-18

8.  Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities in Hip Fracture Care.

Authors:  Christopher J Dy; Joseph M Lane; Ting Jung Pan; Michael L Parks; Stephen Lyman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Joint line level in revision total knee replacement: assessment and functional results with an average of seven years follow-up.

Authors:  Arnaud Clavé; Goulven Le Henaff; Thomas Roger; Paul Maisongrosse; Christian Mabit; Frédéric Dubrana
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 10.  Survivorship and functional outcomes of patellofemoral arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  J P van der List; H Chawla; H A Zuiderbaan; A D Pearle
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-11-21       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.