Elke Jeschke1, Mustafa Citak2, Christian Günster1, Andreas Matthias Halder3, Karl-Dieter Heller4, Jürgen Malzahn5, Fritz Uwe Niethard6, Peter Schräder7, Josef Zacher8, Thorsten Gehrke9. 1. Research Institute of the Local Health Care Funds (AOK), Berlin, Germany. 2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, HELIOS ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, Holstenstraße 2, 22767, Hamburg, Germany. dr.mustafa.citak@gmail.com. 3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sana Kliniken Sommerfeld, Sommerfeld, Germany. 4. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Herzogin Elisabeth Hospital, Braunschweig, Germany. 5. Federal Association of the Local Health Care Funds, Berlin, Germany. 6. German Society of Orthopedics and Orthopedic Surgery, Berlin, Germany. 7. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kreisklinik Jugenheim, Jugenheim, Germany. 8. HELIOS Kliniken GmbH, Berlin, Germany. 9. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, HELIOS ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, Holstenstraße 2, 22767, Hamburg, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: High-volume hospitals have achieved better outcomes for THAs and unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (UKAs). However, few studies have analyzed implant survival after primary TKA in high-volume centers. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: Is the risk of revision surgery higher when receiving a TKA in a low-volume hospital than in a high-volume hospital? METHODS: Using nationwide billing data of the largest German healthcare insurer for inpatient hospital treatment, we identified 45,165 TKAs in 44,465 patients insured by Allgemeine Ortskrankenkasse who had undergone knee replacement surgery between January 2012 and December 2012. Revision rates were calculated at 1 and 2 years in all knees. The hospital volume was calculated using volume quintiles of the number of all knee arthroplasties performed in each center. We used multiple logistic regression to model the odds of revision surgery as a function of hospital volume. Age, sex, 31 comorbidities, and variables for socioeconomic status were included as independent variables in the model. RESULTS: After controlling for socioeconomic factors, patient age, sex, and comorbidities, we found that having surgery in a high-volume hospital was associated with a decreased risk of having revision TKA within 2 years of the index procedure. The odds ratio for the 2-year revision was 1.6 (95% CI, 1.4-2.0; p < 0.001) for an annual hospital volume of 56 or fewer cases, 1.5 (95% CI, 1.3-1.7; p < 0.001) for 57 to 93 cases, 1.2 (95% CI, 1.0-1.3; p = 0.039) for 94 to 144 cases, and 1.1 (95% CI, 0.9-1.2; p = 0.319) for 145 to 251 cases compared with a hospital volume of 252 or more cases. CONCLUSIONS: We found a clear association of higher risk for revision surgery when undergoing a TKA in a hospital where less than 145 arthroplasties per year were performed. The study results could help practitioners to guide potential patients in hospitals that perform more TKAs to reduce the overall revision and complication rates. Furthermore, this study underscores the importance of a minimum hospital threshold of arthroplasty cases per year to get permission to perform an arthroplasty. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.
BACKGROUND: High-volume hospitals have achieved better outcomes for THAs and unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (UKAs). However, few studies have analyzed implant survival after primary TKA in high-volume centers. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: Is the risk of revision surgery higher when receiving a TKA in a low-volume hospital than in a high-volume hospital? METHODS: Using nationwide billing data of the largest German healthcare insurer for inpatient hospital treatment, we identified 45,165 TKAs in 44,465 patients insured by Allgemeine Ortskrankenkasse who had undergone knee replacement surgery between January 2012 and December 2012. Revision rates were calculated at 1 and 2 years in all knees. The hospital volume was calculated using volume quintiles of the number of all knee arthroplasties performed in each center. We used multiple logistic regression to model the odds of revision surgery as a function of hospital volume. Age, sex, 31 comorbidities, and variables for socioeconomic status were included as independent variables in the model. RESULTS: After controlling for socioeconomic factors, patient age, sex, and comorbidities, we found that having surgery in a high-volume hospital was associated with a decreased risk of having revision TKA within 2 years of the index procedure. The odds ratio for the 2-year revision was 1.6 (95% CI, 1.4-2.0; p < 0.001) for an annual hospital volume of 56 or fewer cases, 1.5 (95% CI, 1.3-1.7; p < 0.001) for 57 to 93 cases, 1.2 (95% CI, 1.0-1.3; p = 0.039) for 94 to 144 cases, and 1.1 (95% CI, 0.9-1.2; p = 0.319) for 145 to 251 cases compared with a hospital volume of 252 or more cases. CONCLUSIONS: We found a clear association of higher risk for revision surgery when undergoing a TKA in a hospital where less than 145 arthroplasties per year were performed. The study results could help practitioners to guide potential patients in hospitals that perform more TKAs to reduce the overall revision and complication rates. Furthermore, this study underscores the importance of a minimum hospital threshold of arthroplasty cases per year to get permission to perform an arthroplasty. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.
Authors: J Michael Paterson; J Ivan Williams; Hans J Kreder; Nizar N Mahomed; Nadia Gunraj; Xuesong Wang; Andreas Laupacis Journal: Can J Surg Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 2.089
Authors: Robert S Namba; Guy Cafri; Monti Khatod; Maria C S Inacio; Timothy W Brox; Elizabeth W Paxton Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2013-08-15 Impact factor: 4.757
Authors: Kevin J Bozic; Judith Maselli; Penelope S Pekow; Peter K Lindenauer; Thomas P Vail; Andrew D Auerbach Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2010-11-17 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Nicholas C Laucis; Mohammed Chowdhury; Abhijit Dasgupta; Timothy Bhattacharyya Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2016-05-04 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Stephan R Maman; Michael H Andreae; Licia K Gaber-Baylis; Zachary A Turnbull; Robert S White Journal: J Comp Eff Res Date: 2019-10-23 Impact factor: 1.744
Authors: Jimmy K Wong; T Edward Kim; Seshadri C Mudumbai; Stavros G Memtsoudis; Nicholas J Giori; Steven K Howard; Roberta K Oka; Robert King; Edward R Mariano Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2019-01 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Benjamin F Ricciardi; Andrew Y Liu; Bowen Qiu; Thomas G Myers; Caroline P Thirukumaran Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Gabriel Ramirez; Thomas G Myers; Caroline P Thirukumaran; Benjamin F Ricciardi Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2021-12-21 Impact factor: 4.755
Authors: Edward C Beck; Benedict U Nwachukwu; Elaine K Lee; Reagan Chapman; Allston J Stubbs; Matthew Gitelis; Jonathan Rasio; Shane J Nho Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2020-03-20