Literature DB >> 11950577

Ten to fourteen year survival and functional analysis of the AGC total knee replacement system.

Richard L Worland1, Gonzalo Vazquez-Vela Johnson, Jose Alemparte, Douglas E Jessup, Jonathan Keenan, Nelson Norambuena, Gonzalo Johnson.   

Abstract

A study of 562 Anatomic Graduated Component (AGC) total knee arthroplasties that were performed in 402 patients between November 1986 and September 1990 is reported. All patients had implantation with a cemented posterior cruciate-retaining design, with resurfacing of the patella using all polyethylene patella components. Mean age at surgery was 71 years (range 41-92 years). Patients were followed for a minimum of 10 years (range 10-14 years). Nine knees were lost to follow-up (1.4%). The mean Knee Society Score for pain and function were analyzed by Charnley categories: Category A -- 97 (pain) and 89 (function); Category B -- 91 (pain) and 84 (function); and Category C -- 89 (pain) and 62 (function). The survival analysis at 14 years was 97% with revision for any reason as the endpoint and the authors continue to utilize this implant system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11950577     DOI: 10.1016/s0968-0160(01)00146-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee        ISSN: 0968-0160            Impact factor:   2.199


  15 in total

1.  Joint first for hip and knee replacements.

Authors:  Max Edwards; Hannah Josty
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  The mini-incision mid-vastus approach for total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Markus Flören; Heiko Reichel; Jack Davis; Richard S Laskin
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.154

3.  A comparison of the PCL-retaining AGC and posterior stabilizing legacy prostheses for total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Philip M Faris; Merrill A Ritter; Thomas J Aleto; Andrew L Pierce
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2006-09

Review 4.  Validity of published outcome data concerning Anatomic Graduated Component total knee arthroplasty: a structured literature review including arthroplasty register data.

Authors:  Reinhard Schuh; Gerald Dorninger; Mark Agreiter; Nikolaus Boehler; Gerold Labek
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Knee awareness and functionality after simultaneous bilateral vs unilateral total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Roshan Latifi; Morten Grove Thomsen; Thomas Kallemose; Henrik Husted; Anders Troelsen
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2016-03-18

6.  A retrospective medium- to long-term results of 1500 AGC total knee replacements - An independent centre functional follow up and survivorship.

Authors:  Amit Atrey; Mark C Edmondson; Debra East; Kim Miles; Adrian Butler-Manuel; Nigel Ellens
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2014-02-04

7.  Resection arthroplasty for failed patellar components.

Authors:  Carlos J Lavernia; Jose C Alcerro; Michael K Drakeford; Audrey K Tsao; Kenneth A Krackow; David S Hungerford
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Risk factors for revision within 10 years of total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Christopher J Dy; Robert G Marx; Kevin J Bozic; Ting Jung Pan; Douglas E Padgett; Stephen Lyman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Retention of the posterior cruciate ligament versus the posterior stabilized design in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Lennard G H van den Boom; Reinoud W Brouwer; Inge van den Akker-Scheek; Sjoerd K Bulstra; Jos J A M van Raaij
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Do patients care about higher flexion in total knee arthroplasty? A randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial.

Authors:  Morten G Thomsen; Henrik Husted; Kristian S Otte; Gitte Holm; Anders Troelsen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.