Literature DB >> 24344053

Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)--round x.

John Moult1, Krzysztof Fidelis, Andriy Kryshtafovych, Torsten Schwede, Anna Tramontano.   

Abstract

This article is an introduction to the special issue of the journal PROTEINS, dedicated to the tenth Critical Assessment of Structure Prediction (CASP) experiment to assess the state of the art in protein structure modeling. The article describes the conduct of the experiment, the categories of prediction included, and outlines the evaluation and assessment procedures. The 10 CASP experiments span almost 20 years of progress in the field of protein structure modeling, and there have been enormous advances in methods and model accuracy in that period. Notable in this round is the first sustained improvement of models with refinement methods, using molecular dynamics. For the first time, we tested the ability of modeling methods to make use of sparse experimental three-dimensional contact information, such as may be obtained from new experimental techniques, with encouraging results. On the other hand, new contact prediction methods, though holding considerable promise, have yet to make an impact in CASP testing. The nature of CASP targets has been changing in recent CASPs, reflecting shifts in experimental structural biology, with more irregular structures, more multi-domain and multi-subunit structures, and less standard versions of known folds. When allowance is made for these factors, we continue to see steady progress in the overall accuracy of models, particularly resulting from improvement of non-template regions.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CASP; community wide experiment; protein structure prediction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24344053      PMCID: PMC4394854          DOI: 10.1002/prot.24452

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  48 in total

1.  Protein structure prediction and structural genomics.

Authors:  D Baker; A Sali
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-10-05       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)--round 6.

Authors:  John Moult; Krzysztof Fidelis; Burkhard Rost; Tim Hubbard; Anna Tramontano
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2005

3.  SCWRL and MolIDE: computer programs for side-chain conformation prediction and homology modeling.

Authors:  Qiang Wang; Adrian A Canutescu; Roland L Dunbrack
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 4.  Macromolecular modeling with rosetta.

Authors:  Rhiju Das; David Baker
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 23.643

5.  A large-scale experiment to assess protein structure prediction methods.

Authors:  J Moult; J T Pedersen; R Judson; K Fidelis
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1995-11

Review 6.  Protein folding: the endgame.

Authors:  M Levitt; M Gerstein; E Huang; S Subbiah; J Tsai
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 23.643

7.  The expanded FindCore method for identification of a core atom set for assessment of protein structure prediction.

Authors:  David A Snyder; Jennifer Grullon; Yuanpeng J Huang; Roberto Tejero; Gaetano T Montelione
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2014-02

8.  ModBase, a database of annotated comparative protein structure models, and associated resources.

Authors:  Ursula Pieper; Benjamin M Webb; David T Barkan; Dina Schneidman-Duhovny; Avner Schlessinger; Hannes Braberg; Zheng Yang; Elaine C Meng; Eric F Pettersen; Conrad C Huang; Ruchira S Datta; Parthasarathy Sampathkumar; Mallur S Madhusudhan; Kimmen Sjölander; Thomas E Ferrin; Stephen K Burley; Andrej Sali
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 9.  A decade and a half of protein intrinsic disorder: biology still waits for physics.

Authors:  Vladimir N Uversky
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 6.725

10.  The SWISS-MODEL Repository and associated resources.

Authors:  Florian Kiefer; Konstantin Arnold; Michael Künzli; Lorenza Bordoli; Torsten Schwede
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2008-10-18       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  149 in total

1.  From residue coevolution to protein conformational ensembles and functional dynamics.

Authors:  Ludovico Sutto; Simone Marsili; Alfonso Valencia; Francesco Luigi Gervasio
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Distributions of experimental protein structures on coarse-grained free energy landscapes.

Authors:  Kannan Sankar; Jie Liu; Yuan Wang; Robert L Jernigan
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Protein Structure and Function Prediction Using I-TASSER.

Authors:  Jianyi Yang; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Curr Protoc Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-12-17

4.  Accelerating molecular simulations of proteins using Bayesian inference on weak information.

Authors:  Alberto Perez; Justin L MacCallum; Ken A Dill
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Working toward precision medicine: Predicting phenotypes from exomes in the Critical Assessment of Genome Interpretation (CAGI) challenges.

Authors:  Roxana Daneshjou; Yanran Wang; Yana Bromberg; Samuele Bovo; Pier L Martelli; Giulia Babbi; Pietro Di Lena; Rita Casadio; Matthew Edwards; David Gifford; David T Jones; Laksshman Sundaram; Rajendra Rana Bhat; Xiaolin Li; Lipika R Pal; Kunal Kundu; Yizhou Yin; John Moult; Yuxiang Jiang; Vikas Pejaver; Kymberleigh A Pagel; Biao Li; Sean D Mooney; Predrag Radivojac; Sohela Shah; Marco Carraro; Alessandra Gasparini; Emanuela Leonardi; Manuel Giollo; Carlo Ferrari; Silvio C E Tosatto; Eran Bachar; Johnathan R Azaria; Yanay Ofran; Ron Unger; Abhishek Niroula; Mauno Vihinen; Billy Chang; Maggie H Wang; Andre Franke; Britt-Sabina Petersen; Mehdi Pirooznia; Peter Zandi; Richard McCombie; James B Potash; Russ B Altman; Teri E Klein; Roger A Hoskins; Susanna Repo; Steven E Brenner; Alexander A Morgan
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 4.878

6.  Bacterial flagellar switching: a molecular mechanism directed by the logic of an electric motor.

Authors:  Shyantani Maiti; Pralay Mitra
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 1.810

7.  If machines can learn, who needs scientists?

Authors:  Jeffrey C Hoch
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 2.229

8.  Advances in GPCR modeling evaluated by the GPCR Dock 2013 assessment: meeting new challenges.

Authors:  Irina Kufareva; Vsevolod Katritch; Raymond C Stevens; Ruben Abagyan
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 5.006

9.  Aromatic claw: A new fold with high aromatic content that evades structural prediction.

Authors:  Joseph R Sachleben; Aashish N Adhikari; Grzegorz Gawlak; Robert J Hoey; Gaohua Liu; Andrzej Joachimiak; Gaetano T Montelione; Tobin R Sosnick; Shohei Koide
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 10.  Macromolecular Modelling and Docking Simulations for the Discovery of Selective GPER Ligands.

Authors:  Camillo Rosano; Marco Ponassi; Maria Francesca Santolla; Assunta Pisano; Lamberto Felli; Adele Vivacqua; Marcello Maggiolini; Rosamaria Lappano
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 4.009

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.