Literature DB >> 26487681

From residue coevolution to protein conformational ensembles and functional dynamics.

Ludovico Sutto1, Simone Marsili2, Alfonso Valencia3, Francesco Luigi Gervasio4.   

Abstract

The analysis of evolutionary amino acid correlations has recently attracted a surge of renewed interest, also due to their successful use in de novo protein native structure prediction. However, many aspects of protein function, such as substrate binding and product release in enzymatic activity, can be fully understood only in terms of an equilibrium ensemble of alternative structures, rather than a single static structure. In this paper we combine coevolutionary data and molecular dynamics simulations to study protein conformational heterogeneity. To that end, we adapt the Boltzmann-learning algorithm to the analysis of homologous protein sequences and develop a coarse-grained protein model specifically tailored to convert the resulting contact predictions to a protein structural ensemble. By means of exhaustive sampling simulations, we analyze the set of conformations that are consistent with the observed residue correlations for a set of representative protein domains, showing that (i) the most representative structure is consistent with the experimental fold and (ii) the various regions of the sequence display different stability, related to multiple biologically relevant conformations and to the cooperativity of the coevolving pairs. Moreover, we show that the proposed protocol is able to reproduce the essential features of a protein folding mechanism as well as to account for regions involved in conformational transitions through the correct sampling of the involved conformers.

Keywords:  coarse-grained; coevolution; network inference; protein dynamics; protein folding

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26487681      PMCID: PMC4640757          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1508584112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  49 in total

1.  Three-helix-bundle protein in a Ramachandran model.

Authors:  A Irbäck; F Sjunnesson; S Wallin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-12-05       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  PaLaCe: A Coarse-Grain Protein Model for Studying Mechanical Properties.

Authors:  Marco Pasi; Richard Lavery; Nicoletta Ceres
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 6.006

3.  Weak pairwise correlations imply strongly correlated network states in a neural population.

Authors:  Elad Schneidman; Michael J Berry; Ronen Segev; William Bialek
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-04-09       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Ising model for neural data: model quality and approximate methods for extracting functional connectivity.

Authors:  Yasser Roudi; Joanna Tyrcha; John Hertz
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2009-05-19

5.  Learning generative models for protein fold families.

Authors:  Sivaraman Balakrishnan; Hetunandan Kamisetty; Jaime G Carbonell; Su-In Lee; Christopher James Langmead
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-01-25

6.  A Gaussian network model study suggests that structural fluctuations are higher for inactive states than active states of protein kinases.

Authors:  Raju Kalaivani; Narayanaswamy Srinivasan
Journal:  Mol Biosyst       Date:  2015-04

Review 7.  Structure and signaling mechanism of Per-ARNT-Sim domains.

Authors:  Andreas Möglich; Rebecca A Ayers; Keith Moffat
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 5.006

8.  New functional families (FunFams) in CATH to improve the mapping of conserved functional sites to 3D structures.

Authors:  Ian Sillitoe; Alison L Cuff; Benoit H Dessailly; Natalie L Dawson; Nicholas Furnham; David Lee; Jonathan G Lees; Tony E Lewis; Romain A Studer; Robert Rentzsch; Corin Yeats; Janet M Thornton; Christine A Orengo
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Improved side-chain torsion potentials for the Amber ff99SB protein force field.

Authors:  Kresten Lindorff-Larsen; Stefano Piana; Kim Palmo; Paul Maragakis; John L Klepeis; Ron O Dror; David E Shaw
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2010-06

Review 10.  The Ras protein superfamily: evolutionary tree and role of conserved amino acids.

Authors:  Ana Maria Rojas; Gloria Fuentes; Antonio Rausell; Alfonso Valencia
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  49 in total

Review 1.  Epistasis in protein evolution.

Authors:  Tyler N Starr; Joseph W Thornton
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2016-02-28       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Synthetic protein alignments by CCMgen quantify noise in residue-residue contact prediction.

Authors:  Susann Vorberg; Stefan Seemayer; Johannes Söding
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 4.475

3.  Widespread Historical Contingency in Influenza Viruses.

Authors:  Jean Claude Nshogozabahizi; Jonathan Dench; Stéphane Aris-Brosou
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Origins of coevolution between residues distant in protein 3D structures.

Authors:  Ivan Anishchenko; Sergey Ovchinnikov; Hetunandan Kamisetty; David Baker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Large-scale identification of coevolution signals across homo-oligomeric protein interfaces by direct coupling analysis.

Authors:  Guido Uguzzoni; Shalini John Lovis; Francesco Oteri; Alexander Schug; Hendrik Szurmant; Martin Weigt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Correlated positions in protein evolution and engineering.

Authors:  Jorick Franceus; Tom Verhaeghe; Tom Desmet
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 3.346

7.  Structural propensities of kinase family proteins from a Potts model of residue co-variation.

Authors:  Allan Haldane; William F Flynn; Peng He; R S K Vijayan; Ronald M Levy
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2016-06-26       Impact factor: 6.725

8.  Conservation of coevolving protein interfaces bridges prokaryote-eukaryote homologies in the twilight zone.

Authors:  Juan Rodriguez-Rivas; Simone Marsili; David Juan; Alfonso Valencia
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Potts Hamiltonian models of protein co-variation, free energy landscapes, and evolutionary fitness.

Authors:  Ronald M Levy; Allan Haldane; William F Flynn
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 6.809

10.  Patterns of coevolving amino acids unveil structural and dynamical domains.

Authors:  Daniele Granata; Luca Ponzoni; Cristian Micheletti; Vincenzo Carnevale
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.