Literature DB >> 24327305

The expanded FindCore method for identification of a core atom set for assessment of protein structure prediction.

David A Snyder1, Jennifer Grullon, Yuanpeng J Huang, Roberto Tejero, Gaetano T Montelione.   

Abstract

Maximizing the scientific impact of NMR-based structure determination requires robust and statistically sound methods for assessing the precision of NMR-derived structures. In particular, a method to define a core atom set for calculating superimpositions and validating structure predictions is critical to the use of NMR-derived structures as targets in the CASP competition. FindCore (Snyder and Montelione, Proteins 2005;59:673-686) is a superimposition independent method for identifying a core atom set and partitioning that set into domains. However, as FindCore optimizes superimposition by sensitively excluding not-well-defined atoms, the FindCore core may not comprise all atoms suitable for use in certain applications of NMR structures, including the CASP assessment process. Adapting the FindCore approach to assess predicted models against experimental NMR structures in CASP10 required modification of the FindCore method. This paper describes conventions and a standard protocol to calculate an "Expanded FindCore" atom set suitable for validation and application in biological and biophysical contexts. A key application of the Expanded FindCore method is to identify a core set of atoms in the experimental NMR structure for which it makes sense to validate predicted protein structure models. We demonstrate the application of this Expanded FindCore method in characterizing well-defined regions of 18 NMR-derived CASP10 target structures. The Expanded FindCore protocol defines "expanded core atom sets" that match an expert's intuition of which parts of the structure are sufficiently well defined to use in assessing CASP model predictions. We also illustrate the impact of this analysis on the CASP GDT assessment scores.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CASP; NMR; RMSD; protein structure; superimposition

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24327305      PMCID: PMC3932188          DOI: 10.1002/prot.24490

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  27 in total

1.  Processing and evaluation of predictions in CASP4.

Authors:  A Zemla; J Moult; K Fidelis
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2001

2.  Clustering algorithms for identifying core atom sets and for assessing the precision of protein structure ensembles.

Authors:  David A Snyder; Gaetano T Montelione
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2005-06-01

3.  Simulated annealing with restrained molecular dynamics using CONGEN: energy refinement of the NMR solution structures of epidermal and type-alpha transforming growth factors.

Authors:  R Tejero; D Bassolino-Klimas; R E Bruccoleri; G T Montelione
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 4.  Equilibrium NMR studies of unfolded and partially folded proteins.

Authors:  H J Dyson; P E Wright
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  1998-07

5.  A large-scale experiment to assess protein structure prediction methods.

Authors:  J Moult; J T Pedersen; R Judson; K Fidelis
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1995-11

6.  AQUA and PROCHECK-NMR: programs for checking the quality of protein structures solved by NMR.

Authors:  R A Laskowski; J A Rullmannn; M W MacArthur; R Kaptein; J M Thornton
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 2.835

7.  An automated approach for defining core atoms and domains in an ensemble of NMR-derived protein structures.

Authors:  L A Kelley; S P Gardner; M J Sutcliffe
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  1997-06

8.  Processing and analysis of CASP3 protein structure predictions.

Authors:  A Zemla; C Venclovas; J Moult; K Fidelis
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1999

9.  The solution structure of eglin c based on measurements of many NOEs and coupling constants and its comparison with X-ray structures.

Authors:  S G Hyberts; M S Goldberg; T F Havel; G Wagner
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 10.  Quality assessment of protein NMR structures.

Authors:  Antonio Rosato; Roberto Tejero; Gaetano T Montelione
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2013-09-21       Impact factor: 6.809

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  A community resource of experimental data for NMR / X-ray crystal structure pairs.

Authors:  John K Everett; Roberto Tejero; Sarath B K Murthy; Thomas B Acton; James M Aramini; Michael C Baran; Jordi Benach; John R Cort; Alexander Eletsky; Farhad Forouhar; Rongjin Guan; Alexandre P Kuzin; Hsiau-Wei Lee; Gaohua Liu; Rajeswari Mani; Binchen Mao; Jeffrey L Mills; Alexander F Montelione; Kari Pederson; Robert Powers; Theresa Ramelot; Paolo Rossi; Jayaraman Seetharaman; David Snyder; G V T Swapna; Sergey M Vorobiev; Yibing Wu; Rong Xiao; Yunhuang Yang; Cheryl H Arrowsmith; John F Hunt; Michael A Kennedy; James H Prestegard; Thomas Szyperski; Liang Tong; Gaetano T Montelione
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Definition and classification of evaluation units for CASP10.

Authors:  Todd J Taylor; Chin-Hsien Tai; Yuanpeng J Huang; Jeremy Block; Hongjun Bai; Andriy Kryshtafovych; Gaetano T Montelione; Byungkook Lee
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2013-11-22

3.  Guiding automated NMR structure determination using a global optimization metric, the NMR DP score.

Authors:  Yuanpeng Janet Huang; Binchen Mao; Fei Xu; Gaetano T Montelione
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 2.835

4.  AlphaFold Models of Small Proteins Rival the Accuracy of Solution NMR Structures.

Authors:  Roberto Tejero; Yuanpeng Janet Huang; Theresa A Ramelot; Gaetano T Montelione
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2022-06-13

5.  Assessment of prediction methods for protein structures determined by NMR in CASP14: Impact of AlphaFold2.

Authors:  Yuanpeng Janet Huang; Ning Zhang; Beate Bersch; Krzysztof Fidelis; Masayori Inouye; Yojiro Ishida; Andriy Kryshtafovych; Naohiro Kobayashi; Yutaka Kuroda; Gaohua Liu; Andy LiWang; G V T Swapna; Nan Wu; Toshio Yamazaki; Gaetano T Montelione
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2021-10-19

6.  Assessment of template-based protein structure predictions in CASP10.

Authors:  Yuanpeng J Huang; Binchen Mao; James M Aramini; Gaetano T Montelione
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2014-02

Review 7.  Quality assessment of protein NMR structures.

Authors:  Antonio Rosato; Roberto Tejero; Gaetano T Montelione
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2013-09-21       Impact factor: 6.809

8.  Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)--round x.

Authors:  John Moult; Krzysztof Fidelis; Andriy Kryshtafovych; Torsten Schwede; Anna Tramontano
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2013-12-17

Review 9.  Modern Technologies of Solution Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy for Three-dimensional Structure Determination of Proteins Open Avenues for Life Scientists.

Authors:  Toshihiko Sugiki; Naohiro Kobayashi; Toshimichi Fujiwara
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 7.271

10.  Outcome of the First wwPDB Hybrid/Integrative Methods Task Force Workshop.

Authors:  Andrej Sali; Helen M Berman; Torsten Schwede; Jill Trewhella; Gerard Kleywegt; Stephen K Burley; John Markley; Haruki Nakamura; Paul Adams; Alexandre M J J Bonvin; Wah Chiu; Matteo Dal Peraro; Frank Di Maio; Thomas E Ferrin; Kay Grünewald; Aleksandras Gutmanas; Richard Henderson; Gerhard Hummer; Kenji Iwasaki; Graham Johnson; Catherine L Lawson; Jens Meiler; Marc A Marti-Renom; Gaetano T Montelione; Michael Nilges; Ruth Nussinov; Ardan Patwardhan; Juri Rappsilber; Randy J Read; Helen Saibil; Gunnar F Schröder; Charles D Schwieters; Claus A M Seidel; Dmitri Svergun; Maya Topf; Eldon L Ulrich; Sameer Velankar; John D Westbrook
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 5.006

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.