Literature DB >> 24340276

Spinal pedicle subtraction osteotomy for fixed sagittal imbalance patients.

Seung-Jae Hyun1, Yongjung J Kim, Seung-Chul Rhim.   

Abstract

In addressing spinal sagittal imbalance through a posterior approach, the surgeon now may choose from among a variety of osteotomy techniques. Posterior column osteotomies such as the facetectomy or Ponte or Smith-Petersen osteotomy provide the least correction, but can be used at multiple levels with minimal blood loss and a lower operative risk. Pedicle subtraction osteotomies provide nearly 3 times the per-level correction of Ponte/Smith-Petersen osteotomies; however, they carry increased technical demands, longer operative time, and greater blood loss and associated significant morbidity, including neurological injury. The literature focusing on pedicle subtraction osteotomy for fixed sagittal imbalance patients is reviewed. The long-term overall outcomes, surgical tips to reduce the complications and suggestions for their proper application are also provided.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical outcome; Complication; Pedicle subtraction osteotomy; Proximal junctional kyphosis; Sagittal imbalance

Year:  2013        PMID: 24340276      PMCID: PMC3856301          DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v1.i8.242

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Clin Cases        ISSN: 2307-8960            Impact factor:   1.337


  28 in total

1.  Clinical and radiographic outcomes of thoracic and lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy for fixed sagittal imbalance.

Authors:  Benson P Yang; Stephen L Ondra; Larry A Chen; Hee Soo Jung; Tyler R Koski; Sean A Salehi
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2006-07

2.  Can we safely reduce blood loss during lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy procedures using tranexamic acid or aprotinin? A comparative study with controls.

Authors:  Christine R Baldus; Keith H Bridwell; Lawrence G Lenke; Gbolahan O Okubadejo
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 3.  Outcome of pedicle subtraction osteotomies for fixed sagittal imbalance of multiple etiologies: a retrospective review of 140 patients.

Authors:  Ki-Tack Kim; Sang-Hun Lee; Kyung-Soo Suk; Jung-Hee Lee; Bi-O Jeong
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Transpedicular decompression and pedicle subtraction osteotomy (eggshell procedure): a retrospective review of 59 patients.

Authors:  Daniel B Murrey; Craig D Brigham; Gary M Kiebzak; Frederick Finger; Samuel J Chewning
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Complications and predictive factors for the successful treatment of flatback deformity (fixed sagittal imbalance).

Authors:  K C Booth; K H Bridwell; L G Lenke; C R Baldus; K M Blanke
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 6.  Lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy.

Authors:  Michael Y Wang; Sigurd H Berven
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.654

7.  Adult spinal deformity surgery: complications and outcomes in patients over age 60.

Authors:  Michael D Daubs; Lawrence G Lenke; Gene Cheh; Georgia Stobbs; Keith H Bridwell
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Results of lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomies for fixed sagittal imbalance: a minimum 5-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Yongjung J Kim; Keith H Bridwell; Lawrence G Lenke; Gene Cheh; Christine Baldus
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Neurologic complications of lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy: a 10-year assessment.

Authors:  Jacob M Buchowski; Keith H Bridwell; Lawrence G Lenke; Craig A Kuhns; Ronald A Lehman; Youngjung J Kim; David Stewart; Chris Baldus
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  A central hook-rod construct for osteotomy closure: a technical note.

Authors:  Kota Watanabe; Lawrence G Lenke; Michael D Daubs; Young-Woo Kim; Youngbae B Kim; Kei Watanabe; Georgia Stobbs
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Intraoperative Multimodal Monitoring in Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomies of the Lumbar Spine: A Narrative Literature Review.

Authors:  Jianning Shao; Bryan S Lee; Dominic Pelle; Maxwell Y Lee; Jason Savage; Joseph E Tanenbaum; Thomas E Mroz; Michael P Steinmetz
Journal:  Clin Spine Surg       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.876

2.  Pedicle subtraction osteotomy in the lumbar spine: indications, technical aspects, results and complications.

Authors:  Cedric Barrey; Gilles Perrin; Frederic Michel; Jean-Marc Vital; Ibrahim Obeid
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-05-07

3.  Osteotomies through a fusion mass in the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Vital; Louis Boissière; Anouar Bourghli; Jean-Etienne Castelain; Vincent Challier; Ibrahim Obeid
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-11-22       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Pedicle subtraction osteotomy for the treatment of chin-on-chest deformity in a post-radiotherapy dropped head syndrome: a case report and review of literature.

Authors:  Luigi Caruso; Giuseppe Barone; Andrea Farneti; Auro Caraffa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-09-13       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Effectiveness and Safety of Tranexamic Acid in Spinal Deformity Surgery.

Authors:  Ho Yong Choi; Seung-Jae Hyun; Ki-Jeong Kim; Tae-Ahn Jahng; Hyun-Jib Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2016-12-29

Review 6.  Decision Making Algorithm for Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery.

Authors:  Yongjung J Kim; Seung-Jae Hyun; Gene Cheh; Samuel K Cho; Seung-Chul Rhim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2016-07-08

7.  Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy with a Cage Prevents Sagittal Translation in the Correction of Kyphosis in Ankylosing Spondylitis.

Authors:  Fan-Qi Hu; Wen-Hao Hu; Hao Zhang; Kai Song; Yao Wang; Tian-Hao Wang; Yan Wang; Xue-Song Zhang
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2018-01-20       Impact factor: 2.628

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.