Literature DB >> 17873810

Results of lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomies for fixed sagittal imbalance: a minimum 5-year follow-up study.

Yongjung J Kim1, Keith H Bridwell, Lawrence G Lenke, Gene Cheh, Christine Baldus.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
OBJECTIVE: To report results at a minimum 5 years after pedicle subtraction osteotomy for fixed sagittal imbalance. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: No one has reported results of pedicle subtraction osteotomies with a 5- to 8-year follow-up.
METHOD: Thirty-five consecutive patients with sagittal imbalance (29 females/6 males, average age at surgery, 53.1 years) treated with lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomies (1 at L1, 13 at L2, 20 at L3, and 1 at L4) at 1 institution were analyzed (average follow-up, 5.8 years; range, 5-7.6 years). Radiographic and clinical outcomes analysis was performed.
RESULTS: There were no significant regional radiographic changes between 2 years postoperative and the ultimate follow-up (proximal junctional change, P = 0.30; thoracic kyphosis, P = 0.38; and lumbar lordosis, P = 0.84), although many patients did demonstrate an increasingly anterior C7 sagittal plumb with time. Ten pseudarthroses (29%) occurred in 8 patients and were revised between 2 and 5 years postoperative. There were no pseudarthroses at the osteotomy level (9 at the thoracolumbar junction, 1 at the LS junction), but at the levels added to the previous fusions. There was no degradation in Oswestry and Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) outcome scores between 2 years postoperative and ultimate follow-up (P = 0.23 and 0.90, respectively). Patients reported very good satisfaction (87%), good self-image (76%), good function (69%), and fair pain subscales (66%) at ultimate follow-up. Sagittal vertical axis <8 cm at ultimate follow-up was significant for better SRS outcomes scores (P = 0.038). Eight patients with revised pseudarthroses did not demonstrate poorer SRS outcomes scores (P = 0.52). Those 8 patients were queried after their pseudarthrosis revision surgery.
CONCLUSION: Pedicle subtraction osteotomy can provide satisfactory clinical and radiographic outcomes for patients with a minimum 5-year follow-up despite needing pseudarthrosis revision and some component of increasingly positive sagittal vertical axis between 2 years and 5 to 8 years of follow-up. The level of patient satisfaction and self-image subscales were high after more than 5 years of follow-up. Restoration and maintenance of sagittal vertical axis <8 cm were important to the ultimate sagittal reconstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17873810     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31814b8371

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  83 in total

Review 1.  [Instrumental fixation in spinal surgery. Particular characteristics in patients with manifest osteoporosis].

Authors:  C Klöckner
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Correction of posttraumatic kyphosis of the thoracolumbar spine with modified pedicle subtraction osteotomy.

Authors:  Klaus J Schnake; Frank Kandziora
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Spinal pedicle subtraction osteotomy for fixed sagittal imbalance patients.

Authors:  Seung-Jae Hyun; Yongjung J Kim; Seung-Chul Rhim
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2013-11-16       Impact factor: 1.337

4.  Thoracolumbar imbalance analysis for osteotomy planification using a new method: FBI technique.

Authors:  J C Le Huec; P Leijssen; M Duarte; S Aunoble
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Sagittal spino-pelvic alignment failures following three column thoracic osteotomy for adult spinal deformity.

Authors:  Virginie Lafage; Justin S Smith; Shay Bess; Frank J Schwab; Christopher P Ames; Eric Klineberg; Vincent Arlet; Richard Hostin; Douglas C Burton; Christopher I Shaffrey
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Biomechanical in vitro comparison between anterior column realignment and pedicle subtraction osteotomy for severe sagittal imbalance correction.

Authors:  Luigi La Barbera; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Christian Liebsch; Tomaso Villa; Andrea Luca; Fabio Galbusera; Marco Brayda-Bruno
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Kinematic efficacy of supplemental anterior lumbar interbody fusion at lumbosacral levels in thoracolumbosacral deformity correction with and without pedicle subtraction osteotomy at L3: an in vitro cadaveric study.

Authors:  Benny T Dahl; Jonathan A Harris; Manasa Gudipally; Mark Moldavsky; Saif Khalil; Brandon S Bucklen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Spinal osteotomies to treat post-traumatic thoracolumbar deformity.

Authors:  R Cecchinato; P Berjano; M Damilano; C Lamartina
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-04-28

9.  The results of closing wedge osteotomy with posterior instrumented fusion for the surgical treatment of congenital kyphosis.

Authors:  Yunus Atici; Sami Sökücü; Onat Uzümcügil; Akif Albayrak; Sinan Erdoğan; Mehmet Akif Kaygusuz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Osteotomy of the spine to correct the spinal deformity.

Authors:  Ki-Tack Kim; Kyoung-Jun Park; Jung-Hee Lee
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2009-12-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.