Literature DB >> 24332942

Bipolar nanosecond electric pulses are less efficient at electropermeabilization and killing cells than monopolar pulses.

Bennett L Ibey1, Jody C Ullery2, Olga N Pakhomova3, Caleb C Roth4, Iurii Semenov3, Hope T Beier5, Melissa Tarango2, Shu Xiao3, Karl H Schoenbach3, Andrei G Pakhomov3.   

Abstract

Multiple studies have shown that bipolar (BP) electric pulses in the microsecond range are more effective at permeabilizing cells while maintaining similar cell survival rates as compared to monopolar (MP) pulse equivalents. In this paper, we investigated whether the same advantage existed for BP nanosecond-pulsed electric fields (nsPEF) as compared to MP nsPEF. To study permeabilization effectiveness, MP or BP pulses were delivered to single Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells and the response of three dyes, Calcium Green-1, propidium iodide (PI), and FM1-43, was measured by confocal microscopy. Results show that BP pulses were less effective at increasing intracellular calcium concentration or PI uptake and cause less membrane reorganization (FM1-43) than MP pulses. Twenty-four hour survival was measured in three cell lines (Jurkat, U937, CHO) and over ten times more BP pulses were required to induce death as compared to MP pulses of similar magnitude and duration. Flow cytometry analysis of CHO cells after exposure (at 15 min) revealed that to achieve positive FITC-Annexin V and PI expression, ten times more BP pulses were required than MP pulses. Overall, unlike longer pulse exposures, BP nsPEF exposures proved far less effective at both membrane permeabilization and cell killing than MP nsPEF. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bipolar; CHO; Calcium; FM1-43; Monopolar; Nanosecond electric pulse

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24332942      PMCID: PMC3936343          DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.12.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun        ISSN: 0006-291X            Impact factor:   3.575


  23 in total

1.  Electropermeabilization of cell membranes.

Authors: 
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  1999-01-04       Impact factor: 15.470

2.  Model of creation and evolution of stable electropores for DNA delivery.

Authors:  Kyle C Smith; John C Neu; Wanda Krassowska
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Theoretical considerations of tissue electroporation with high-frequency bipolar pulses.

Authors:  Christopher B Arena; Michael B Sano; Marissa Nichole Rylander; Rafael V Davalos
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  Tissue ablation with irreversible electroporation.

Authors:  R V Davalos; I L M Mir; B Rubinsky
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.934

5.  Theoretical evaluation of voltage inducement on internal membranes of biological cells exposed to electric fields.

Authors:  Tadej Kotnik; Damijan Miklavcic
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-10-20       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 6.  A brief overview of electroporation pulse strength-duration space: a region where additional intracellular effects are expected.

Authors:  James C Weaver; Kyle C Smith; Axel T Esser; Reuben S Son; T R Gowrishankar
Journal:  Bioelectrochemistry       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 5.373

7.  Primary pathways of intracellular Ca(2+) mobilization by nanosecond pulsed electric field.

Authors:  Iurii Semenov; Shu Xiao; Andrei G Pakhomov
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2012-12-05

8.  Dose-dependent thresholds of 10-ns electric pulse induced plasma membrane disruption and cytotoxicity in multiple cell lines.

Authors:  Bennett L Ibey; Caleb C Roth; Andrei G Pakhomov; Joshua A Bernhard; Gerald J Wilmink; Olga N Pakhomova
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Transient features in nanosecond pulsed electric fields differentially modulate mitochondria and viability.

Authors:  Stephen J Beebe; Yeong-Jer Chen; Nova M Sain; Karl H Schoenbach; Shu Xiao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Two modes of cell death caused by exposure to nanosecond pulsed electric field.

Authors:  Olga N Pakhomova; Betsy W Gregory; Iurii Semenov; Andrei G Pakhomov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  21 in total

1.  The second phase of bipolar, nanosecond-range electric pulses determines the electroporation efficiency.

Authors:  Andrei G Pakhomov; Sergey Grigoryev; Iurii Semenov; Maura Casciola; Chunqi Jiang; Shu Xiao
Journal:  Bioelectrochemistry       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 5.373

2.  Cancellation of nerve excitation by the reversal of nanosecond stimulus polarity and its relevance to the gating time of sodium channels.

Authors:  Maura Casciola; Shu Xiao; Francesca Apollonio; Alessandra Paffi; Micaela Liberti; Claudia Muratori; Andrei G Pakhomov
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2019-05-04       Impact factor: 9.261

3.  Visualization of Dynamic Sub-microsecond Changes in Membrane Potential.

Authors:  Hope T Beier; Caleb C Roth; Joel N Bixler; Anna V Sedelnikova; Bennett L Ibey
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Dye Transport through Bilayers Agrees with Lipid Electropore Molecular Dynamics.

Authors:  Esin B Sözer; Sourav Haldar; Paul S Blank; Federica Castellani; P Thomas Vernier; Joshua Zimmerberg
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Selective susceptibility to nanosecond pulsed electric field (nsPEF) across different human cell types.

Authors:  Elena C Gianulis; Chantelle Labib; Gintautas Saulis; Vitalij Novickij; Olga N Pakhomova; Andrei G Pakhomov
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 9.261

6.  Cell stimulation and calcium mobilization by picosecond electric pulses.

Authors:  Iurii Semenov; Shu Xiao; Dongkoo Kang; Karl H Schoenbach; Andrei G Pakhomov
Journal:  Bioelectrochemistry       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 5.373

7.  Avoiding nerve stimulation in irreversible electroporation: a numerical modeling study.

Authors:  Borja Mercadal; Christopher B Arena; Rafael V Davalos; Antoni Ivorra
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Cancellation of cellular responses to nanoelectroporation by reversing the stimulus polarity.

Authors:  Andrei G Pakhomov; Iurii Semenov; Shu Xiao; Olga N Pakhomova; Betsy Gregory; Karl H Schoenbach; Jody C Ullery; Hope T Beier; Sambasiva R Rajulapati; Bennett L Ibey
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 9.261

9.  Ion transport into cells exposed to monopolar and bipolar nanosecond pulses.

Authors:  Karl H Schoenbach; Andrei G Pakhomov; Iurii Semenov; Shu Xiao; Olga N Pakhomova; Bennett L Ibey
Journal:  Bioelectrochemistry       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 5.373

10.  Electropermeabilization of cells by closely spaced paired nanosecond-range pulses.

Authors:  Iurii Semenov; Maura Casciola; Bennet L Ibey; Shu Xiao; Andrei G Pakhomov
Journal:  Bioelectrochemistry       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 5.373

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.