Literature DB >> 28901954

Avoiding nerve stimulation in irreversible electroporation: a numerical modeling study.

Borja Mercadal1, Christopher B Arena, Rafael V Davalos, Antoni Ivorra.   

Abstract

Electroporation based treatments consist in applying one or multiple high voltage pulses to the tissues to be treated. As an undesired side effect, these pulses cause electrical stimulation of excitable tissues such as nerves and muscles. This increases the complexity of the treatments and may pose a risk to the patient. To minimize electrical stimulation during electroporation based treatments, it has been proposed to replace the commonly used monopolar pulses by bursts of short bipolar pulses. In the present study, we have numerically analyzed the rationale for such approach. We have compared different pulsing protocols in terms of their electroporation efficacy and their capability of triggering action potentials in nerves. For that, we have developed a modeling framework that combines numerical models of nerve fibers and experimental data on irreversible electroporation. Our results indicate that, by replacing the conventional relatively long monopolar pulses by bursts of short bipolar pulses, it is possible to ablate a large tissue region without triggering action potentials in a nearby nerve. Our models indicate that this is possible because, as the pulse length of these bipolar pulses is reduced, the stimulation thresholds raise faster than the irreversible electroporation thresholds. We propose that this different dependence on the pulse length is due to the fact that transmembrane charging for nerve fibers is much slower than that of cells treated by electroporation because of their geometrical differences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28901954      PMCID: PMC5744675          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa8c53

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  43 in total

1.  Towards electroporation based treatment planning considering electric field induced muscle contractions.

Authors:  Alex Golberg; Boris Rubinsky
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-04

Review 2.  Electroporation for the delivery of DNA-based vaccines and immunotherapeutics: current clinical developments.

Authors:  Angela M Bodles-Brakhop; Richard Heller; Ruxandra Draghia-Akli
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 11.454

3.  Analysis of excitable cell activation: relative effects of external electrical stimuli.

Authors:  K W Altman; R Plonsey
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  The effect of high frequency electric pulses on muscle contractions and antitumor efficiency in vivo for a potential use in clinical electrochemotherapy.

Authors:  Damijan Miklavcic; Gorazd Pucihar; Miran Pavlovec; Samo Ribaric; Marko Mali; Alenka Macek-Lebar; Marko Petkovsek; Janez Nastran; Simona Kranjc; Maja Cemazar; Gregor Sersa
Journal:  Bioelectrochemistry       Date:  2004-12-10       Impact factor: 5.373

5.  Comparison of the effects of the repetition rate between microsecond and nanosecond pulses: electropermeabilization-induced electro-desensitization?

Authors:  A Silve; A Guimerà Brunet; B Al-Sakere; A Ivorra; L M Mir
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2014-02-28

6.  Quantification of cell membrane permeability induced by monopolar and high-frequency bipolar bursts of electrical pulses.

Authors:  Daniel C Sweeney; Matej Reberšek; Janja Dermol; Lea Rems; Damijan Miklavčič; Rafael V Davalos
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2016-06-29

7.  Dependence of Electroporation Detection Threshold on Cell Radius: An Explanation to Observations Non Compatible with Schwan's Equation Model.

Authors:  Borja Mercadal; P Thomas Vernier; Antoni Ivorra
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 1.843

8.  Membrane potential perturbations induced in tissue cells by pulsed electric fields.

Authors:  M S Cooper
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.010

9.  Specific membrane properties of cat motoneurones.

Authors:  J N Barrett; W E Crill
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1974-06       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Modeling of electric field distribution in tissues during electroporation.

Authors:  Selma Corovic; Igor Lackovic; Primoz Sustaric; Tomaz Sustar; Tomaz Rodic; Damijan Miklavcic
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 2.819

View more
  9 in total

1.  Muscle contractions and pain sensation accompanying high-frequency electroporation pulses.

Authors:  Aleksandra Cvetkoska; Alenka Maček-Lebar; Peter Trdina; Damijan Miklavčič; Matej Reberšek
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  A Theoretical Argument for Extended Interpulse Delays in Therapeutic High-Frequency Irreversible Electroporation Treatments.

Authors:  Kenneth N Aycock; Yajun Zhao; Melvin F Lorenzo; Rafael V Davalos
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 4.756

3.  The use of high-frequency short bipolar pulses in cisplatin electrochemotherapy in vitro.

Authors:  Maria Scuderi; Matej Rebersek; Damijan Miklavcic; Janja Dermol-Cerne
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 2.991

4.  High-frequency irreversible electroporation is an effective tumor ablation strategy that induces immunologic cell death and promotes systemic anti-tumor immunity.

Authors:  Veronica M Ringel-Scaia; Natalie Beitel-White; Melvin F Lorenzo; Rebecca M Brock; Kathleen E Huie; Sheryl Coutermarsh-Ott; Kristin Eden; Dylan K McDaniel; Scott S Verbridge; John H Rossmeisl; Kenneth J Oestreich; Rafael V Davalos; Irving C Allen
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 8.143

5.  Dynamics of Cell Death After Conventional IRE and H-FIRE Treatments.

Authors:  Borja Mercadal; Natalie Beitel-White; Kenneth N Aycock; Quim Castellví; Rafael V Davalos; Antoni Ivorra
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 3.934

6.  Temporal Characterization of Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption with High-Frequency Electroporation.

Authors:  Melvin F Lorenzo; Sean C Thomas; Yukitaka Kani; Jonathan Hinckley; Matthew Lee; Joy Adler; Scott S Verbridge; Fang-Chi Hsu; John L Robertson; Rafael V Davalos; John H Rossmeisl
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-23       Impact factor: 6.639

7.  AC Pulsed Field Ablation Is Feasible and Safe in Atrial and Ventricular Settings: A Proof-of-Concept Chronic Animal Study.

Authors:  Guido Caluori; Eva Odehnalova; Tomasz Jadczyk; Martin Pesl; Iveta Pavlova; Lucia Valikova; Steffen Holzinger; Veronika Novotna; Vladimir Rotrekl; Ales Hampl; Michal Crha; Dalibor Cervinka; Zdenek Starek
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-12-03

8.  The Effect of Discharge Mode on the Distribution of Myocardial Pulsed Electric Field-A Simulation Study for Pulsed Field Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Xingkai Ji; Hao Zhang; Lianru Zang; Shengjie Yan; Xiaomei Wu
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Dev Dis       Date:  2022-03-24

9.  Electroporation and cell killing by milli- to nanosecond pulses and avoiding neuromuscular stimulation in cancer ablation.

Authors:  Emily Gudvangen; Vitalii Kim; Vitalij Novickij; Federico Battista; Andrei G Pakhomov
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 4.996

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.