Eve Wittenberg1, Monica Bharel2, John F P Bridges3, Zachary Ward4, Linda Weinreb5. 1. Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts ewittenb@hsph.harvard.edu. 2. The Boston Health Care for the Homeless Program, and Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; currently: Department of Public Health, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Boston, Massachusetts. 3. Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland. 4. Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts. 5. Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Best-worst scaling (BWS) is a survey method for assessing individuals' priorities. It identifies the extremes-best and worst items, most and least important factors, biggest and smallest influences-among sets. In this article, we demonstrate an application of BWS in a primary care setting to illustrate its use in identifying patient priorities for services. METHODS: We conducted a BWS survey in 2014 in Boston, Massachusetts, to assess the relative importance of 10 previously identified attributes of Papanicolaou (Pap) testing services among women experiencing homelessness. Women were asked to evaluate 11 sets of 5 attributes of Pap services, and identify which attribute among each set would have the biggest and smallest influence on promoting uptake. We show how frequency analysis can be used to analyze results. RESULTS: In all, 165 women participated, a response rate of 72%. We identified the most and least salient influences on encouraging Pap screening based on their frequency of report among our sample, with possible standardized scores ranging from+1.0 (biggest influence) to -1.0 (smallest influence). Most important was the availability of support for issues beyond health (+0.39), while least important was the availability of accommodations for personal hygiene (-0.27). CONCLUSIONS: BWS quantifies patient priorities in a manner that is transparent and accessible. It is easily comprehendible by patients and relatively easy to administer. Our application illustrates its use in a vulnerable population, showing that factors beyond those typically provided in health care settings are highly important to women in seeking Pap screening. This approach can be applied to other health care services where prioritization is helpful to guide decisions.
PURPOSE: Best-worst scaling (BWS) is a survey method for assessing individuals' priorities. It identifies the extremes-best and worst items, most and least important factors, biggest and smallest influences-among sets. In this article, we demonstrate an application of BWS in a primary care setting to illustrate its use in identifying patient priorities for services. METHODS: We conducted a BWS survey in 2014 in Boston, Massachusetts, to assess the relative importance of 10 previously identified attributes of Papanicolaou (Pap) testing services among women experiencing homelessness. Women were asked to evaluate 11 sets of 5 attributes of Pap services, and identify which attribute among each set would have the biggest and smallest influence on promoting uptake. We show how frequency analysis can be used to analyze results. RESULTS: In all, 165 women participated, a response rate of 72%. We identified the most and least salient influences on encouraging Pap screening based on their frequency of report among our sample, with possible standardized scores ranging from+1.0 (biggest influence) to -1.0 (smallest influence). Most important was the availability of support for issues beyond health (+0.39), while least important was the availability of accommodations for personal hygiene (-0.27). CONCLUSIONS: BWS quantifies patient priorities in a manner that is transparent and accessible. It is easily comprehendible by patients and relatively easy to administer. Our application illustrates its use in a vulnerable population, showing that factors beyond those typically provided in health care settings are highly important to women in seeking Pap screening. This approach can be applied to other health care services where prioritization is helpful to guide decisions.
Authors: Wendy J Ungar; Anahita Hadioonzadeh; Mehdi Najafzadeh; Nicole W Tsao; Sharon Dell; Larry D Lynd Journal: Respir Med Date: 2014-04-15 Impact factor: 3.415
Authors: Roy C Baron; Barbara K Rimer; Rosalind A Breslow; Ralph J Coates; Jon Kerner; Stephanie Melillo; Nancy Habarta; Geetika P Kalra; Sajal Chattopadhyay; Katherine M Wilson; Nancy C Lee; Patricia Dolan Mullen; Steven S Coughlin; Peter A Briss Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Aslam Ejaz; Gaya Spolverato; John F Bridges; Neda Amini; Yuhree Kim; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2014-06-04 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Nancy L Schoenborn; Norah L Crossnohere; Ellen M Janssen; Craig E Pollack; Cynthia M Boyd; Antonio C Wolff; Qian-Li Xue; Jacqueline Massare; Marcela Blinka; John F P Bridges Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-08-26 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Tatenda T Yemeke; Elizabeth E Kiracho; Aloysius Mutebi; Rebecca R Apolot; Anthony Ssebagereka; Daniel R Evans; Sachiko Ozawa Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-07-30 Impact factor: 3.240