Literature DB >> 29804169

Engaging patients and caregivers in prioritizing symptoms impacting quality of life for Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophy.

Ilene L Hollin1,2, Holly Peay3, Ryan Fischer4, Ellen M Janssen5, John F P Bridges5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Patient preference information (PPI) have an increasing role in regulatory decision-making, especially in benefit-risk assessment. PPI can also facilitate prioritization of symptoms to treat and inform meaningful selection of clinical trial endpoints. We engaged patients and caregivers to prioritize symptoms of Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophy (DBMD) and explored preference heterogeneity.
METHODS: Best-worst scaling (object case) was used to assess priorities across 11 symptoms of DBMD that impact quality of life and for which there is unmet need. Respondents selected the most and least important symptoms to treat among a subset of five. Relative importance scores were estimated for each symptom, and preference heterogeneity was identified using mixed logit and latent class analysis.
RESULTS: Respondents included patients (n = 59) and caregivers (n = 96) affected by DBMD. Results indicated that respondents prioritized "weaker heart pumping" [score = 5.13; 95% CI (4.67, 5.59)] and pulmonary symptoms: "lung infections" [3.15; (2.80, 3.50)] and "weaker ability to cough" [2.65; (2.33, 2.97)] as the most important symptoms to treat and "poor attention span" as the least important symptom to treat [- 5.23; (- 5.93, - 4.54)]. Statistically significant preference heterogeneity existed (p value < 0.001). At least two classes existed with different priorities. Priorities of the majority latent class (80%) reflected the aggregate results, whereas the minority latent class (20%) did not distinguish among pulmonary and other symptoms.
CONCLUSIONS: Estimates of the relative importance for symptoms of Duchenne muscular dystrophy indicated that symptoms with direct links to morbidity and mortality were prioritized above other non-skeletal muscle symptoms. Findings suggested the existence of preference heterogeneity for symptoms, which may be related to symptom experience.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Best–worst scaling; Duchenne muscular dystrophy; Outcomes research; Patient preferences

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29804169     DOI: 10.1007/s11136-018-1891-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  36 in total

Review 1.  Valuing citizen and patient preferences in health: recent developments in three types of best-worst scaling.

Authors:  Terry N Flynn
Journal:  Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.217

2.  Engaging Patients Across the Spectrum of Medical Product Development: View From the US Food and Drug Administration.

Authors:  Nina L Hunter; Kathryn M O'Callaghan; Robert M Califf
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Patient preference for latent tuberculosis infection preventive treatment: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Na Guo; Carlo A Marra; J Mark FitzGerald; R Kevin Elwood; Aslam H Anis; Fawziah Marra
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 5.725

4.  A discrete choice conjoint experiment to evaluate parent preferences for treatment of young, medication naive children with ADHD.

Authors:  Daniel A Waschbusch; Charles E Cunningham; William E Pelham; Heather L Rimas; Andrew R Greiner; Elizabeth M Gnagy; James Waxmonsky; Gregory A Fabiano; Jessica A Robb; Lisa Burrows-Maclean; Mindy Scime; Martin T Hoffman
Journal:  J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol       Date:  2011

Review 5.  The muscular dystrophies.

Authors:  Alan E H Emery
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-02-23       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Cancer patients' trade-offs among efficacy, toxicity, and out-of-pocket cost in the curative and noncurative setting.

Authors:  Yu-Ning Wong; Brian L Egleston; Kush Sachdeva; Naa Eghan; Melanie Pirollo; Tammy K Stump; John Robert Beck; Katrina Armstrong; Jerome Sanford Schwartz; Neal J Meropol
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Understanding preferences for disease-modifying drugs in osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Liana Fraenkel; Lisa Suter; Charles E Cunningham; Gillian Hawker
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.794

8.  Investigating attribute non-attendance and its consequences in choice experiments with latent class models.

Authors:  Mylene Lagarde
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 3.046

9.  Best--worst scaling: What it can do for health care research and how to do it.

Authors:  Terry N Flynn; Jordan J Louviere; Tim J Peters; Joanna Coast
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2006-05-16       Impact factor: 3.883

10.  FDA Approves Eteplirsen for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: The Next Chapter in the Eteplirsen Saga.

Authors:  Annemieke Aartsma-Rus; Arthur M Krieg
Journal:  Nucleic Acid Ther       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 5.486

View more
  6 in total

1.  Comparing the Preferences of Patients and the General Public for Treatment Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Norah L Crossnohere; Sarah Janse; Ellen Janssen; John F P Bridges
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Imaging respiratory muscle quality and function in Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

Authors:  Alison M Barnard; Donovan J Lott; Abhinandan Batra; William T Triplett; Sean C Forbes; Samuel L Riehl; Rebecca J Willcocks; Barbara K Smith; Krista Vandenborne; Glenn A Walter
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 3.  To what degree are orphan drugs patient-centered? A review of the current state of clinical research in rare diseases.

Authors:  Sally Lanar; Catherine Acquadro; James Seaton; Isabelle Savre; Benoit Arnould
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 4.123

4.  A Comparison of Caregiver and Patient Preferences for Treating Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.

Authors:  Norah L Crossnohere; Ryan Fischer; Elizabeth Vroom; Patricia Furlong; John F P Bridges
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 3.481

5.  Unmet Therapeutic Needs of Non-Ambulatory Patients with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: A Mixed-Method Analysis.

Authors:  Anne L R Schuster; Norah L Crossnohere; Ryan Fischer; Patricia Furlong; John F P Bridges
Journal:  Ther Innov Regul Sci       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 1.778

6.  The road to successful people-centric research in rare diseases: the web-based case study of the Immunology and Congenital Disorders of Glycosylation questionnaire (ImmunoCDGQ).

Authors:  Rita Francisco; Sandra Brasil; Carlota Pascoal; Jaak Jaeken; Merell Liddle; Paula A Videira; Vanessa Dos Reis Ferreira
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 4.123

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.