Literature DB >> 8035685

Word frequency and list composition effects in associative recognition and recall.

S E Clark1, R E Burchett.   

Abstract

The effects of list composition and word frequency on cued recall, associative recognition, and item recognition were examined in three experiments. For pure-frequency lists, cued recall and associative recognition show better performance on common high-frequency (HF) words than on rare low-frequency (LF) words. Item recognition, however, shows an advantage for LF words. In mixed lists, consisting of half HF and half LF words, the HF advantage in cued recall disappeared; however, the word frequency effects in item and associative recognition were unchanged. These results are inconsistent with explanations based on differential attention or co-rehearsal of HF and LF words. However, the results are consistent with list strength results which show that recognition is insensitive to strength-based list composition, but that recall is sensitive to list composition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8035685     DOI: 10.3758/bf03202761

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  12 in total

1.  Cuing effects and associative information in recognition memory.

Authors:  S E Clark; R M Shiffrin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1992-09

2.  Time course of item and associative information: implications for global memory models.

Authors:  S D Gronlund; R Ratcliff
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Relational information and the context effect in recognition memory.

Authors:  M S Humphreys
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1976-03

4.  List-strength effect: I. Data and discussion.

Authors:  R Ratcliff; S E Clark; R M Shiffrin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  The mirror effect in recognition memory: data and theory.

Authors:  M Glanzer; J K Adams
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  List-strength effect: II. Theoretical mechanisms.

Authors:  R M Shiffrin; R Ratcliff; S E Clark
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Temporal contrast and the word frequency effect.

Authors:  R B May; L J Cuddy; J M Norton
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1979-09

8.  The mirror effect in recognition memory.

Authors:  M Glanzer; J K Adams
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1985-01

9.  A retrieval model for both recognition and recall.

Authors:  G Gillund; R M Shiffrin
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Word frequency effects in associative and item recognition.

Authors:  S E Clark
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1992-05
View more
  15 in total

1.  Familiarity and recollection in item and associative recognition.

Authors:  W E Hockley; A Consoli
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-07

2.  The revelation effect for item and associative recognition: familiarity versus recollection.

Authors:  T E Cameron; W E Hockley
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-03

3.  Recollection-based recognition eliminates the revelation effect in memory.

Authors:  D L Westerman
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-03

4.  Associative recognition: a case of recall-to-reject processing.

Authors:  C M Rotello; E Heit
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-09

5.  The role of stimulus type in list length effects in recognition memory.

Authors:  Angela Kinnell; Simon Dennis
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-04

6.  Strong memories obscure weak memories in associative recognition.

Authors:  Michael F Verde; Caren M Rotello
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-12

7.  The retrieval practice effect in associative recognition.

Authors:  Michael F Verde
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-12

8.  Intention to learn influences the word frequency effect in recall but not in recognition memory.

Authors:  Stephen A Dewhurst; Karen R Brandt; Melanie S Sharp
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-12

9.  Familiarity from orthographic information: extensions of the recognition without identification effect.

Authors:  Marianne E Lloyd; Deanne L Westerman; Jeremy K Miller
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-01

10.  Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the data.

Authors:  S E Clark; S D Gronlund
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1996-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.