Literature DB >> 20565205

Continuous recollection versus unitized familiarity in associative recognition.

Laura Mickes1, Emily M Johnson, John T Wixted.   

Abstract

Recollection has long been thought to play a key role in associative recognition tasks. Evidence that associative recollection might be a threshold process has come from analyses of the associative recognition receiver operating characteristic (ROC). Specifically, the ROC is not as curvilinear as a signal detection theory requires. In addition, the Z-ROC is usually curvilinear, as a threshold recollection model requires, not linear, as a signal detection model requires. In Experiment 1, word pairs were strengthened at study, which yielded a curvilinear ROC and a linear Z-ROC (in accordance with signal detection theory). This result suggests that associative recognition performance was based on a continuous variable, one that likely consists of either unitized familiarity or continuous recollection. The remember-know procedure and an unexpected cued recall test suggested that the more curvilinear ROC in the strong condition was mainly due to increased recollection. In Experiment 2, word pairs were presented for an old-new recognition decision before being presented for an associative recognition decision. When pairs consisting of items not recognized as having been seen on the list were removed from the analysis, the ROC again became curvilinear, the Z-ROC again became linear, and most associative recognition decisions were associated with remember judgments. These findings suggest that the curvilinear Z-ROC often observed on associative recognition tests results from noise, as a mixture signal detection model assumes, and that recollection is a continuous process that yields a curvilinear ROC that is well characterized by signal detection theory. (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20565205      PMCID: PMC2892159          DOI: 10.1037/a0019755

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  50 in total

1.  Retrieval processes in recognition and cued recall.

Authors:  P A Nobel; R M Shiffrin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Familiarity and recollection in item and associative recognition.

Authors:  W E Hockley; A Consoli
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-07

3.  The contribution of recollection and familiarity to recognition and source-memory judgments: a formal dual-process model and an analysis of receiver operating characteristics.

Authors:  A P Yonelinas
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Source ROCs are (typically) curvilinear: comment on Yonelinas (1999).

Authors:  J Qin; C L Raye; M K Johnson; K J Mitchell
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Time course of item and associative information: implications for global memory models.

Authors:  S D Gronlund; R Ratcliff
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Support for a continuous (single-process) model of recognition memory and source memory.

Authors:  Scott D Slotnick; Chad S Dodson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-01

7.  Neural correlates of availability and accessibility in memory.

Authors:  Reza Habib; Lars Nyberg
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  ERP correlates of familiarity and recollection processes in visual associative recognition.

Authors:  Nicole K Speer; Tim Curran
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 9.  The medial temporal lobe and recognition memory.

Authors:  H Eichenbaum; A P Yonelinas; C Ranganath
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 12.449

10.  Experiences of remembering, knowing, and guessing.

Authors:  J M Gardiner; C Ramponi; A Richardson-Klavehn
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  1998-03
View more
  18 in total

1.  Effects of age on negative subsequent memory effects associated with the encoding of item and item-context information.

Authors:  Julia T Mattson; Tracy H Wang; Marianne de Chastelaine; Michael D Rugg
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Effects of modality on the neural correlates of encoding processes supporting recollection and familiarity.

Authors:  Lauren J Gottlieb; Michael D Rugg
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 2.460

3.  Looking for graded recollection: manipulating the number of details to be recollected does not affect recollection variance.

Authors:  Colleen M Parks
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-02

4.  Format change and semantic relatedness effects on the ERP correlates of recognition: old pairs, new pairs, different stories.

Authors:  Fabrice Guillaume; Sophia Baier; Mélanie Bourgeois; Sophie Tinard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Source accuracy data reveal the thresholded nature of human episodic memory.

Authors:  Iain M Harlow; David I Donaldson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-04

6.  The medial temporal lobe and the attributes of memory.

Authors:  John T Wixted; Larry R Squire
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  The neural correlates of recollection and retrieval monitoring: Relationships with age and recollection performance.

Authors:  Marianne de Chastelaine; Julia T Mattson; Tracy H Wang; Brian E Donley; Michael D Rugg
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Examining the causes of memory strength variability: recollection, attention failure, or encoding variability?

Authors:  Joshua D Koen; Mariam Aly; Wei-Chun Wang; Andrew P Yonelinas
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Neural correlates of encoding within- and across-domain inter-item associations.

Authors:  Heekyeong Park; Michael D Rugg
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Distinguishing between the success and precision of recollection.

Authors:  Iain M Harlow; Andrew P Yonelinas
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2014-12-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.