Literature DB >> 1502275

Testing global memory models using ROC curves.

R Ratcliff1, C F Sheu, S D Gronlund.   

Abstract

Global memory models are evaluated by using data from recognition memory experiments. For recognition, each of the models gives a value of familiarity as the output from matching a test item against memory. The experiments provide ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curves that give information about the standard deviations of familiarity values for old and new test items in the models. The experimental results are consistent with normal distributions of familiarity (a prediction of the models). However, the results also show that the new-item familiarity standard deviation is about 0.8 that of the old-item familiarity standard deviation and independent of the strength of the old items (under the assumption of normality). The models are inconsistent with these results because they predict either nearly equal old and new standard deviations or increasing values of old standard deviation with strength. Thus, the data provide the basis for revision of current models or development of new models.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1502275     DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.99.3.518

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rev        ISSN: 0033-295X            Impact factor:   8.934


  103 in total

1.  Using ROC curves to test models of recognition memory: the relationship between presentation duration and slope.

Authors:  E Hirshman; M Hostetter
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-03

2.  Recognition memory for faces: when familiarity supports associative recognition judgments.

Authors:  A P Yonelinas; N E Kroll; I G Dobbins; M Soltani
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-12

3.  The ability of familiarity, disruption, and the relative strength of nonenvironmental context cues to explain unreliable environmental-context-dependent memory effects in free recall.

Authors:  A Rutherford
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-12

4.  Predicting individual false alarm rates and signal detection theory: a role for remembering.

Authors:  I G Dobbins; W Khoe; A P Yonelinas; N E Kroll
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-12

5.  The variance theory of the mirror effect in recognition memory.

Authors:  S Sikström
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-09

6.  Recognition memory for source and occurrence: the importance of recollection.

Authors:  Joel R Quamme; Christina Frederick; Neal E A Kroll; Andrew P Yonelinas; Ian G Dobbins
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-09

7.  Evaluating the unequal-variance and dual-process explanations of zROC slopes with response time data and the diffusion model.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Starns; Roger Ratcliff; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  The mirror effect and the spacing effect.

Authors:  Bennet Murdock
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-09

9.  Word frequency and receiver operating characteristic curves in recognition memory: evidence for a dual-process interpretation.

Authors:  Jason Arndt; Lynne M Reder
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Judgment of frequency versus recognition confidence: repetition and recursive reminding.

Authors:  Douglas L Hintzman
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.