Literature DB >> 24306140

Factors which impact the delivery of genetic risk assessment services focused on inherited cancer genomics: expanding the role and reach of certified genetics professionals.

Cristi Radford1, Anya Prince, Karen Lewis, Tuya Pal.   

Abstract

There is tremendous excitement about the promise of new genomic technologies to transform medical practice and improve patient care. Although the full power of genetic diagnosis has not yet been realized, paradigms of clinical decision-making are changing. In fact, recent policy level changes to promote genetic counseling by certified genetics professionals (GP) such as genetic counselors and clinical geneticists, are occurring at both the payer and state level. However, there remain opportunities to develop policies within the United States to: 1) enhance the access to the limited workforce of GPs; 2) revise reimbursement schemes such that costs to deliver these services may be recouped by institutions with GPs; and 3) protect against the potential for discrimination based on genetic information. Although many of these issues predate advances in genomic technologies, they are exacerbated by them, with increasing access and awareness as costs of testing decrease. Consequently, evolving shifts in national policies poise GPs to serve as a hub of information and may be instrumental in facilitating new models to deliver genetics-based care through promoting academic-community partnerships and interfacing with non-GPs. As we acknowledge the potential for genomics to revolutionize medical practice, the expertise of GPs may be leveraged to facilitate incorporation of this information into mainstream medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24306140     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-013-9668-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  26 in total

1.  Using core public health functions to promote BRCA best practices among health plans.

Authors:  D Duquette; K Lewis; J McLosky; J Bach
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 2.000

2.  Realizing genomic medicine.

Authors:  Elizabeth G Phimister; W Gregory Feero; Alan E Guttmacher
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Genetic risk assessment and BRCA mutation testing for breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility: recommendation statement.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2005-09-06       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Multiplex genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: out on the high wire without a net?

Authors:  Susan M Domchek; Angela Bradbury; Judy E Garber; Kenneth Offit; Mark E Robson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Essential elements of genetic cancer risk assessment, counseling, and testing: updated recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors.

Authors:  Bronson D Riley; Julie O Culver; Cécile Skrzynia; Leigha A Senter; June A Peters; Josephine W Costalas; Faith Callif-Daley; Sherry C Grumet; Katherine S Hunt; Rebecca S Nagy; Wendy C McKinnon; Nancie M Petrucelli; Robin L Bennett; Angela M Trepanier
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Hereditary breast/ovarian and colorectal cancer genetics knowledge in a national sample of US physicians.

Authors:  L Wideroff; S T Vadaparampil; M H Greene; S Taplin; L Olson; A N Freedman
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2005-03-22       Impact factor: 6.318

7.  Extending comprehensive cancer center expertise in clinical cancer genetics and genomics to diverse communities: the power of partnership.

Authors:  Deborah J MacDonald; Kathleen R Blazer; Jeffrey N Weitzel
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 11.908

8.  Finishing the euchromatic sequence of the human genome.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-10-21       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  What is the clinical utility of genetic testing?

Authors:  Scott D Grosse; Muin J Khoury
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Deficiency of knowledge of genetics and genetic tests among general practitioners, gynecologists, and pediatricians: a global problem.

Authors:  Marieke J H Baars; Lidewij Henneman; Leo P Ten Kate
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  14 in total

1.  Risk for Patient Harm in Canadian Genetic Counseling Practice: It's Time to Consider Regulation.

Authors:  Andrea L Shugar; Nada Quercia; Christopher Trevors; Marina M Rabideau; Sohnee Ahmed
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Are Australasian Genetic Counselors Interested in Private Practice at the Primary Care Level of Health Service?

Authors:  Vrunda Sane; Linda Humphreys; Madelyn Peterson
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Experiences of Genetic Counselors Practicing in Rural Areas.

Authors:  Margaret Emmet; Quinn Stein; Erin Thorpe; MaryAnn Campion
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Factors associated with genetic counseling and BRCA testing in a population-based sample of young Black women with breast cancer.

Authors:  D Cragun; D Bonner; J Kim; M R Akbari; S A Narod; A Gomez-Fuego; J D Garcia; S T Vadaparampil; Tuya Pal
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Evaluation of laboratory perspectives on hereditary cancer panels.

Authors:  Jessica Stoll; Scott M Weissman; Nicole Hook; Christina Selkirk; Amy Knight Johnson; Anna Newlin; Kristen J Vogel Postula
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Patient and genetic counselor perceptions of in-person versus telephone genetic counseling for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Aryana S Jacobs; Marc D Schwartz; Heiddis Valdimarsdottir; Rachel H Nusbaum; Gillian W Hooker; Tiffani A DeMarco; Jessica E Heinzmann; Wendy McKinnon; Shelley R McCormick; Claire Davis; Andrea D Forman; Alexandra Perez Lebensohn; Emily Dalton; Diana Moglia Tully; Kristi D Graves; Morgan Similuk; Scott Kelly; Beth N Peshkin
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  Preconception counseling: do patients learn about genetics from their obstetrician gynecologists?

Authors:  Adrienne H Mandelberger; Jared C Robins; John E Buster; William C Strohsnitter; Beth J Plante
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 8.  Care delivery considerations for widespread and equitable implementation of inherited cancer predisposition testing.

Authors:  Deborah Cragun; Anita Y Kinney; Tuya Pal
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 5.225

9.  Evolution of Hereditary Breast Cancer Genetic Services: Are Changes Reflected in the Knowledge and Clinical Practices of Florida Providers?

Authors:  Deborah Cragun; Courtney Scherr; Lucia Camperlengo; Susan T Vadaparampil; Tuya Pal
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2016-08-15

10.  Comparing models of delivery for cancer genetics services among patients receiving primary care who meet criteria for genetic evaluation in two healthcare systems: BRIDGE randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Kimberly A Kaphingst; Wendy Kohlmann; Rachelle Lorenz Chambers; Melody S Goodman; Richard Bradshaw; Priscilla A Chan; Daniel Chavez-Yenter; Sarah V Colonna; Whitney F Espinel; Jessica N Everett; Amanda Gammon; Eric R Goldberg; Javier Gonzalez; Kelsi J Hagerty; Rachel Hess; Kelsey Kehoe; Cecilia Kessler; Kadyn E Kimball; Shane Loomis; Tiffany R Martinez; Rachel Monahan; Joshua D Schiffman; Dani Temares; Katie Tobik; David W Wetter; Devin M Mann; Kensaku Kawamoto; Guilherme Del Fiol; Saundra S Buys; Ophira Ginsburg
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.