Literature DB >> 27910721

Care delivery considerations for widespread and equitable implementation of inherited cancer predisposition testing.

Deborah Cragun1, Anita Y Kinney2,3, Tuya Pal4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: DNA sequencing advances through next-generation sequencing (NGS) and several practice changing events, have led to shifting paradigms for inherited cancer predisposition testing. These changes necessitated a means by which to maximize health benefits without unnecessarily inflating healthcare costs and exacerbating health disparities. Areas covered: NGS-based tests encompass multi-gene panel tests, whole exome sequencing, and whole genome sequencing, all of which test for multiple genes simultaneously, compared to prior sequencing practices through which testing was performed sequentially for one or two genes. Taking an ecological approach, this article synthesizes the current literature to consider the broad impact of these advances from the individual patient-, interpersonal-, organizational-, community- and policy-levels. Furthermore, the authors describe how multi-level factors that impact genetic testing and follow-up care reveal great potential to widen existing health disparities if these issues are not addressed. Expert commentary: As we consider ways to maximize patient benefit from testing in a cost effective manner, it is important to consider perspectives from multiple levels. This information is needed to guide the development of interventions such that the promise of genomic testing may be realized by all populations, regardless of race, ethnicity and ability to pay.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genetic testing; health disparities; inherited cancer; multi-gene panel testing; next-generation sequencing

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27910721      PMCID: PMC5642111          DOI: 10.1080/14737159.2017.1267567

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn        ISSN: 1473-7159            Impact factor:   5.225


  120 in total

1.  A vision for the future of genomics research.

Authors:  Francis S Collins; Eric D Green; Alan E Guttmacher; Mark S Guyer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-04-14       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Self-regulatory Processes in the Adoption and Maintenance of Health Behaviors.

Authors:  R Schwarzer
Journal:  J Health Psychol       Date:  1999-03

Review 3.  Translating social ecological theory into guidelines for community health promotion.

Authors:  D Stokols
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  1996 Mar-Apr

Review 4.  Communicating genetic risk information within families: a review.

Authors:  Mel Wiseman; Caroline Dancyger; Susan Michie
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.375

5.  Acceptance of genetic testing for hereditary breast ovarian cancer among study enrollees from an African American kindred.

Authors:  Anita Yeomans Kinney; Sara Ellis Simonsen; Bonnie Jeanne Baty; Diptasri Mandal; Susan L Neuhausen; Kate Seggar; Rich Holubkov; Ken Smith
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2006-04-15       Impact factor: 2.802

6.  BRCA genetic counseling among at-risk Latinas in New York City: new beliefs shape new generation.

Authors:  Katarina M Sussner; Tiffany Edwards; Cristina Villagra; M Carina Rodriguez; Hayley S Thompson; Lina Jandorf; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Next-Generation Sequencing Panels for the Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer and Polyposis Syndromes: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Authors:  Carlos J Gallego; Brian H Shirts; Caroline S Bennette; Greg Guzauskas; Laura M Amendola; Martha Horike-Pyne; Fuki M Hisama; Colin C Pritchard; William M Grady; Wylie Burke; Gail P Jarvik; David L Veenstra
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Genomic risk profiling: attitudes and use in personal and clinical care of primary care physicians who offer risk profiling.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga; Madeline M Carrig; Julianne M O'Daniel; Lori A Orlando; Ley A Killeya-Jones; Geoffrey S Ginsburg; Alex Cho
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Hereditary breast/ovarian and colorectal cancer genetics knowledge in a national sample of US physicians.

Authors:  L Wideroff; S T Vadaparampil; M H Greene; S Taplin; L Olson; A N Freedman
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2005-03-22       Impact factor: 6.318

10.  Genetic services for hereditary breast/ovarian and colorectal cancers - physicians' awareness, use and satisfaction.

Authors:  J C Carroll; M Cappelli; F Miller; B J Wilson; E Grunfeld; C Peeters; A G W Hunter; C Gilpin; P Prakash
Journal:  Community Genet       Date:  2008-01-15
View more
  11 in total

1.  Update on multi-gene panel testing and communication of genetic test results.

Authors:  Sonya Reid; Tuya Pal
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 2.431

2.  Creating accessible Spanish language materials for Clinical Sequencing Evidence-Generating Research consortium genomic projects: challenges and lessons learned.

Authors:  Nangel M Lindberg; Amanda M Gutierrez; Kathleen F Mittendorf; Michelle A Ramos; Beatriz Anguiano; Frank Angelo; Galen Joseph
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 2.119

3.  Genetic Testing in a Population-Based Sample of Breast and Ovarian Cancer Survivors from the REACH Randomized Trial: Cost Barriers and Moderators of Counseling Mode.

Authors:  Laurie E Steffen; Ruofei Du; Amanda Gammon; Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Wendy K Kohlmann; Ji-Hyun Lee; Saundra S Buys; Antoinette M Stroup; Rebecca A Campo; Kristina G Flores; Belinda Vicuña; Marc D Schwartz; Anita Y Kinney
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Development and early implementation of an Accessible, Relational, Inclusive and Actionable approach to genetic counseling: The ARIA model.

Authors:  Leslie Riddle; Laura M Amendola; Marian J Gilmore; Claudia Guerra; Barbara Biesecker; Tia L Kauffman; Katherine Anderson; Alan F Rope; Michael C Leo; Mikaella Caruncho; Gail P Jarvik; Benjamin Wilfond; Katrina A B Goddard; Galen Joseph
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2020-12-23

5.  Genetic Testing: Do Cancer Care Nurses Have a Role?

Authors:  Violeta Lopez
Journal:  Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec

Review 6.  Multi gene panel testing for hereditary breast cancer - is it ready to be used?

Authors:  Andreea Catana; Adina Patricia Apostu; Razvan-Geo Antemie
Journal:  Med Pharm Rep       Date:  2019-07-31

Review 7.  An overview of genetic services delivery for hereditary breast cancer.

Authors:  Sonya Reid; Lucy B Spalluto; Katie Lang; Anne Weidner; Tuya Pal
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 4.624

8.  IMProving care After inherited Cancer Testing (IMPACT) study: protocol of a randomized trial evaluating the efficacy of two interventions designed to improve cancer risk management and family communication of genetic test results.

Authors:  Deborah Cragun; Jason Beckstead; Meagan Farmer; Gillian Hooker; Marleah Dean; Ellen Matloff; Sonya Reid; Ann Tezak; Anne Weidner; Jennifer G Whisenant; Tuya Pal
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Expanding the search for germline pathogenic variants for breast cancer. How far should we go and how high should we jump? The missed opportunity!

Authors:  Hikmat Abdel-Razeq
Journal:  Oncol Rev       Date:  2021-06-24

10.  Adaptation and early implementation of the PREdiction model for gene mutations (PREMM5™) for lynch syndrome risk assessment in a diverse population.

Authors:  Kathleen F Mittendorf; Chinedu Ukaegbu; Marian J Gilmore; Nangel M Lindberg; Tia L Kauffman; Donna J Eubanks; Elizabeth Shuster; Jake Allen; Carmit McMullen; Heather Spencer Feigelson; Katherine P Anderson; Michael C Leo; Jessica Ezzell Hunter; Sonia Okuyama Sasaki; Jamilyn M Zepp; Sapna Syngal; Benjamin S Wilfond; Katrina A B Goddard
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 2.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.