OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to demonstrate whether the dynamic changes previously documented at the ascending and abdominal aorta are replicated at the thoracic aorta. METHODS AND RESULTS: A consecutive series of thirty patients referred to our institution to undergo CT angiography of the thoracic aorta (CTA) constituted the study population. Patients with diffuse aortic atherosclerosis were excluded from the analysis. All studies were acquired with a 256-MDCT scanner and ECG-gating was performed in all cases. Two orthogonal imaging planes (maximal and minimal diameters) were obtained at three different levels of the descending thoracic aorta, using the distance from the left subclavian artery as proximal landmark: 10, 40, and 80 mm distance. The mean age was 58.9±15.7 years and 16 (53%) patients were male. Descending aorta measurements at 10, 40, and 80 mm distance from the left subclavian artery were all significantly larger within the systolic window (P<0.01 for all comparisons). Measurements of the maximal diameter were systematically larger than the minimal diameters among all aortic positions including ungated, systolic, and diastolic measurements (P<0.05 for all comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: The main finding of our pilot investigation was that the thoracic descending aorta undergoes significant conformational changes during the cardiac cycle, irrespective from the distance from the left subclavian artery.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to demonstrate whether the dynamic changes previously documented at the ascending and abdominal aorta are replicated at the thoracic aorta. METHODS AND RESULTS: A consecutive series of thirty patients referred to our institution to undergo CT angiography of the thoracic aorta (CTA) constituted the study population. Patients with diffuse aortic atherosclerosis were excluded from the analysis. All studies were acquired with a 256-MDCT scanner and ECG-gating was performed in all cases. Two orthogonal imaging planes (maximal and minimal diameters) were obtained at three different levels of the descending thoracic aorta, using the distance from the left subclavian artery as proximal landmark: 10, 40, and 80 mm distance. The mean age was 58.9±15.7 years and 16 (53%) patients were male. Descending aorta measurements at 10, 40, and 80 mm distance from the left subclavian artery were all significantly larger within the systolic window (P<0.01 for all comparisons). Measurements of the maximal diameter were systematically larger than the minimal diameters among all aortic positions including ungated, systolic, and diastolic measurements (P<0.05 for all comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: The main finding of our pilot investigation was that the thoracic descending aorta undergoes significant conformational changes during the cardiac cycle, irrespective from the distance from the left subclavian artery.
Authors: Gastón A Rodriguez-Granillo; Pierfrancesco Agostoni; Héctor M García-García; Pim de Feyter; Patrick W Serruys Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2005-10-18 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Joost A van Herwaarden; Lambertus W Bartels; Bart E Muhs; Koen L Vincken; Maud Y A Lindeboom; Arno Teutelink; Frans L Moll; Hence J M Verhagen Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Arno Teutelink; Bart E Muhs; Koen L Vincken; Lambertus W Bartels; Sandra A Cornelissen; Joost A van Herwaarden; Mathias Prokop; Frans L Moll; Hence J M Verhagen Journal: J Endovasc Ther Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 3.487
Authors: Laurens F Tops; David A Wood; Victoria Delgado; Joanne D Schuijf; John R Mayo; Sanjeevan Pasupati; Frouke P L Lamers; Ernst E van der Wall; Martin J Schalij; John G Webb; Jeroen J Bax Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2008-05
Authors: David A Wood; Laurens F Tops; John R Mayo; Sanjeevan Pasupati; Martin J Schalij; Karin Humphries; May Lee; Abdullah Al Ali; Brad Munt; Rob Moss; Christopher R Thompson; Jeroen J Bax; John G Webb Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2009-05-01 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Linda M de Heer; Ricardo P J Budde; Willem P Th M Mali; Alexander M de Vos; Lex A van Herwerden; Jolanda Kluin Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2011-02-27 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Mathias Neugebauer; Martin Glöckler; Leonid Goubergrits; Marcus Kelm; Titus Kuehne; Anja Hennemuth Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2015-05-16 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Dennis T L Wong; Om Narayan; Darryl P Leong; Angela G Bertaso; Murilo G Maia; Brian S H Ko; Timothy Baillie; Sujith K Seneviratne; Matthew I Worthley; Ian T Meredith; James D Cameron Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2015-04-09 Impact factor: 2.357