Literature DB >> 17291151

Use of dynamic computed tomography to evaluate pre- and postoperative aortic changes in AAA patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair.

Arno Teutelink1, Bart E Muhs, Koen L Vincken, Lambertus W Bartels, Sandra A Cornelissen, Joost A van Herwaarden, Mathias Prokop, Frans L Moll, Hence J M Verhagen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To utilize dynamic computed tomographic angiography (CTA) on pre- and postoperative endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) patients to characterize cardiac-induced aortic motion within the aneurysm neck, an essential EVAR sealing zone.
METHODS: Electrocardiographically-gated CTA datasets were acquired utilizing a 64-slice Philips Brilliance CT scanner on 15 consecutive pre- and postoperative AAA patients. Axial pulsatility measurements were taken at 2 clinically relevant levels within the aneurysm neck: 2 cm above the highest renal artery and 1 cm below the lowest renal artery. Changes in aortic area and diameter were determined.
RESULTS: Significant aortic pulsatility exists within the aneurysm neck during the cardiac cycle. Preoperative aortic area increased significantly, with a maximum increase of up to 12.5%. The presence of an endograft did not affect aortic pulsatility (p=NS). Postoperative area also changed significantly during a heart cycle, with a maximum increase of up to 14.5%. Diameter measurements demonstrated an identical pattern, with significant pre- and postoperative intracardiac pulsatility within and above the aneurysm neck (p<0.05). An increase in maximum diameter change up to 15% was evident.
CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing EVAR experience aortic diameter changes within and above the aneurysm neck. The presence of an endograft does not abrogate this response to intracardiac pressure changes. Static CT imaging may not adequately identify patients with large aortic pulsatility, potentially resulting in endograft undersizing, stent-graft migration, intermittent type I endoleaks, and poor patient outcomes. The current standard regime of 10% to 15% oversizing based on static CT may be inadequate for some patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17291151     DOI: 10.1583/06-1976.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endovasc Ther        ISSN: 1526-6028            Impact factor:   3.487


  9 in total

1.  Aortic-neck dilation after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR): can it be predicted?

Authors:  R Iezzi; M Santoro; G Di Natale; F Pirro; R Dattesi; M Nestola; F Snider; L Bonomo
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  3-Dimensional planning of endovascular procedures with multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT): impact on procedural results and clinical outcome?

Authors:  Paul Schoenhagen; Roy K Greenberg
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Cumulative radiation dose and radiation risk from medical imaging in patients subjected to endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Marco Brambilla; Paolo Cerini; Domenico Lizio; Luca Vigna; Alessandro Carriero; Rita Fossaceca
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  Thoracic aorta cardiac-cycle related dynamic changes assessed with a 256-slice CT scanner.

Authors:  Patricia Carrascosa; Carlos Capuñay; Alejandro Deviggiano; Gastón A Rodríguez-Granillo; María Inés Sagarduy; Patricio Cortines; Jorge Carrascosa; Juan C Parodi
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2013-09

5.  Aortic root dimension changes during systole and diastole: evaluation with ECG-gated multidetector row computed tomography.

Authors:  Linda M de Heer; Ricardo P J Budde; Willem P Th M Mali; Alexander M de Vos; Lex A van Herwerden; Jolanda Kluin
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-02-27       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  Changes in suprarenal and infrarenal aortic angles after endovascular aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Ho Kyun Lee; Sang Young Chung; Jea Kyu Kim; Sung Hee Yoo; Soo Jin Na Choi
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 1.859

7.  64-Slice CT angiography of the abdominal aorta and abdominal arteries: comparison of the diagnostic efficacy of iobitridol 350 mgI/ml versus iomeprol 400 mgI/ml in a prospective, randomised, double-blind multi-centre trial.

Authors:  Christian Loewe; Christoph R Becker; Riccardo Berletti; Carlo Alberto Cametti; Jerome Caudron; Walter Coudyzer; Johan De Mey; Massimo Favat; Jean-François Heautot; Sam Heye; Markus Hittinger; Antoine Larralde; Jean-Pierre Lestrat; Roberto Marangoni; Koenraad Nieboer; Peter Reimer; Martin Schwarz; Melanie Schernthaner; Johannes Lammer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Outcomes of Patients With Acute Type B (DeBakey III) Aortic Dissection: A 13-Year, Single-Center Experience.

Authors:  Rana O Afifi; Harleen K Sandhu; Samuel S Leake; Mina L Boutrous; Varsha Kumar; Ali Azizzadeh; Kristofer M Charlton-Ouw; Naveed U Saqib; Tom C Nguyen; Charles C Miller; Hazim J Safi; Anthony L Estrera
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Improving the efficiency of abdominal aortic aneurysm wall stress computations.

Authors:  Jaime E Zelaya; Sevan Goenezen; Phong T Dargon; Amir-Farzin Azarbal; Sandra Rugonyi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.