Literature DB >> 25855464

Regional aortic distensibility and its relationship with age and aortic stenosis: a computed tomography study.

Dennis T L Wong1, Om Narayan, Darryl P Leong, Angela G Bertaso, Murilo G Maia, Brian S H Ko, Timothy Baillie, Sujith K Seneviratne, Matthew I Worthley, Ian T Meredith, James D Cameron.   

Abstract

Aortic distensibility (AD) decreases with age and increased aortic stiffness is independently associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes. The association of severe aortic stenosis (AS) with AD in different aortic regions has not been evaluated. Elderly subjects with severe AS and a cohort of patients without AS of similar age were studied. Proximal aortic cross-sectional-area changes during the cardiac cycle were determined using retrospective-ECG-gating on 128-detector row computed-tomography. Using oscillometric-brachial-blood-pressure measurements, the AD at the ascending-aorta (AA), proximal-descending-aorta (PDA) and distal-descending-aorta (DDA) was determined. Linear mixed effects modelling was used to determine the association of age and aortic stenosis on regional AD. 102 patients were evaluated: 36 AS patients (70-85 years), 24 AS patients (>85 years) and 42 patients without AS (9 patients <50 years, 20 patients between 51-70 years and 13 patients 70-85 years). When comparing patients 70-85 years, AA distensibility was significantly lower in those with AS compared to those without AS (0.9 ± 0.9 vs. 1.4 ± 1.1, P = 0.03) while there was no difference in the PDA (1.0 ± 1.1 vs. 1.0 ± 1.2, P = 0.26) and DDA (1.1 ± 1.2 vs. 1.2 ± 0.8, P = 0.97). In patients without AS, AD decreased with age in all aortic regions (P < 0.001). The AA in patients <50 years were the most distensible compared to other aortic regions. There is regional variation in aortic distensibility with aging. Patients with aortic stenosis demonstrated regional differences in aortic distensibility with lower distensibility demonstrated in the proximal ascending aorta compared to an age-matched cohort.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25855464     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-015-0640-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  27 in total

Review 1.  The clinical significance of aortic compliance and its assessment with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Zafiria M Metafratzi; Stavros C Efremidis; Antigoni S Skopelitou; Albert De Roos
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.364

2.  Age related changes of human aortic distensibility: evaluation with ECG-gated CT.

Authors:  Marika Ganten; Ute Krautter; Waldemar Hosch; Jochen Hansmann; Hendrik von Tengg-Kobligk; Stefan Delorme; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Günter W Kauffmann; Michael Bock
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Expert consensus document on arterial stiffness: methodological issues and clinical applications.

Authors:  Stephane Laurent; John Cockcroft; Luc Van Bortel; Pierre Boutouyrie; Cristina Giannattasio; Daniel Hayoz; Bruno Pannier; Charalambos Vlachopoulos; Ian Wilkinson; Harry Struijker-Boudier
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2006-09-25       Impact factor: 29.983

4.  Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients.

Authors:  Craig R Smith; Martin B Leon; Michael J Mack; D Craig Miller; Jeffrey W Moses; Lars G Svensson; E Murat Tuzcu; John G Webb; Gregory P Fontana; Raj R Makkar; Mathew Williams; Todd Dewey; Samir Kapadia; Vasilis Babaliaros; Vinod H Thourani; Paul Corso; Augusto D Pichard; Joseph E Bavaria; Howard C Herrmann; Jodi J Akin; William N Anderson; Duolao Wang; Stuart J Pocock
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-06-05       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Aortic stiffness is an independent predictor of fatal stroke in essential hypertension.

Authors:  Stéphane Laurent; Sandrine Katsahian; Céline Fassot; Anne-Isabelle Tropeano; Isabelle Gautier; Brigitte Laloux; Pierre Boutouyrie
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2003-04-03       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  Aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis is associated with improved aortic distensibility at long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Attila Nemes; Tjebbe W Galema; Marcel L Geleijnse; Osama I I Soliman; Sing-Chien Yap; Ashraf M Anwar; Folkert J ten Cate
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.749

7.  Relation of aortic distensibility determined by magnetic resonance imaging in patients > or =60 years of age to systolic heart failure and exercise capacity.

Authors:  Pairoj Rerkpattanapipat; W Gregory Hundley; Kerry M Link; Peter H Brubaker; Craig A Hamilton; Stephen N Darty; Timothy M Morgan; Dalane W Kitzman
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2002-12-01       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Decreased aortic distensibility and coronary flow velocity reserve in patients with significant aortic valve stenosis with normal epicardial coronary arteries.

Authors:  Attila Nemes; Tamás Forster; Miklós Csanády
Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis       Date:  2004-07

Review 9.  Hemodynamic shear stress and the endothelium in cardiovascular pathophysiology.

Authors:  Peter F Davies
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2008-11-25

10.  Aortic distensibility in patients with cerebrovascular disease.

Authors:  E D Lehmann; K D Hopkins; R L Jones; A G Rudd; R G Gosling
Journal:  Clin Sci (Lond)       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 6.124

View more
  2 in total

1.  Ascending aortic distensibility and target organ damage in primary hypertension without diabetes.

Authors:  Chong-Fu Jia; Zhao-Qian Wang; Xi-Xia Sun; Zhi-Qiang Yang; Yu-Jie Zou; Yi-Nong Jiang
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Unique hemoglobin dynamics in female Tibetan highlanders.

Authors:  Hiroaki Arima; Masayuki Nakano; Sweta Koirala; Hiromu Ito; Basu Dev Pandey; Kishor Pandey; Takayuki Wada; Taro Yamamoto
Journal:  Trop Med Health       Date:  2021-01-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.