| Literature DB >> 24282516 |
Xiaoyun Wu1, Jing Luo, Song Huang, Ziming Chen, Heng Xiao, Yaping Zhang.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The evolution of the Yunnan Plateau's drainages network during the Pleistocene was dominated by the intense uplifts of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. In the present study, we investigated the association between the evolutionary histories of three main drainage systems and the geographic patterns of genetic differentiation of Poropuntius huangchuchieni. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24282516 PMCID: PMC3839932 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079975
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Phylogenetic trees reconstructed based on mitochondrial control region sequences of all haplotypes (A), the combined sequences of 20 haplotypes (C), and the haplotypes network analysis of the 126 haplotypes (B).
(A) ML tree reconstructed based on mitochondrial control region sequences of all haplotypes under HKY+I+G model. Numbers on major nodes represents bootstrap values after 1,000 replications. If bootstrap values were less than 50%, they were defaulted. Trees were rooted by H. pierrei and one H. vernayi. (B) Haplotypes networks conducted based on the 126 haplotypes. Circle size is proportional to haplotype frequency. The number of black dots on line connected haplotypes represents mutation steps between haplotypes; when the mutation step is 1, it was defaulted. (C) 50% majority-role consensus tree inferred from ML and Bayesian analysis of combined sequences of 20 haplotypes under GTR+I+G model. Numbers at nodes represent the posterior probability for Bayesian analysis and bootstrap value for maximum likelihood (ML) analysis. If the bootstrap values were less than 50%, they were defaulted. Trees were rooted by H. pierrei and one H. vernayi.
Sampling information and size in each lineage, as well as haplotype, and nucleotide diversity of populations based on mtDNA D-loop sequences.
| Sitecode | Site description | Longitude | Latitude | Number of individuals ineach lineage |
| π | |||||
| Total | MK-A | MK-B | RL | LX | SW | ||||||
| M1 | Mekong River; Jinghong | 100.805 E | 22.011 N | 4 | 1 | 3 |
|
| |||
| M2 | Mekong River; Menghan | 100.925 E | 21.845 N | 11 | 11 | 0.8333±0.1002 | 0.0062±0.0036 | ||||
| M3 | Luosuo River, a tributary of MekongRiver | 101.262 E | 21.927 N | 28 | 28 | 0.8492±0.0538 | 0.0045±0.0026 | ||||
| M4 | Mekong river; Guanlei | 101.123 E | 21.688 N | 28 | 24 | 4 | 0.9200±0.0339 | 0.0088±0.0047 | |||
| M5 | Nanla River, a tributary of Mekong River | 101.560 E | 21.437 N | 29 | 29 | 0.8941±0.0382 | 0.0154±0.0079 | ||||
| M6 | Nanlei River, a tributary of MekongRiver | 99.608 E | 22.369 N | 34 | 19 | 13 | 2 | 0.8699±0.0442 | 0.0271±0.0135 | ||
| M7 | Puwen River, a tributary of Luosuo River | 101.067 E | 22.505 N | 24 | 24 | 0.7935±0.0566 | 0.0084±0.0045 | ||||
| M8 | Dazhong River, a tributary of MekongRiver | 100.574 E | 22.557 N | 3 | 3 | – | – | ||||
| M9 | Hei River, a tributary of Mekong River | 100.251 E | 22.636 N | 11 | 3 | 8 | 0.7091±0.0827 | 0.0191±0.0104 | |||
| M10 | Weiyuan River, a tributary of MekongRiver | 100.709 E | 23.485 N | 21 | 20 | 1 | 0.8857±0.0473 | 0.0076±0.0041 | |||
| M11 | Mengjia River, a tributary of MekongRiver | 100.310 E | 23.594 N | 41 | 17 | 24 | 0.9207±0.0258 | 0.0220±0.0110 | |||
| M12 | Mekong River, Manwan | 100.496 E | 24.525 N | 10 | 1 | 9 | 0.8889±0.0754 | 0.0147±0.0081 | |||
| R1 | Amo River, a tributary of Lixian River | 101.753 E | 23.114 N | 27 | 25 | 2 | 0.9316±0.0245 | 0.0118±0.0062 | |||
| R2 | Lixian River, a tributary of Red River | 102.293 E | 22.574 N | 21 | 21 | 0.9053±0.0441 | 0.0058±0.0032 | ||||
| R3 | Tengtiao River, a tributary of LixianRiver | 103.155 E | 22.604 N | 6 | 6 | – | – | ||||
| R4 | Lvzhi River, a tributary of Red River | 101.582 E | 24.243 N | 2 | 2 | – | – | ||||
| R5 | Hedi River, a tributary of Red River | 102.329 E | 23.425 N | 4 | 4 | – | – | ||||
| S1 | Nanka River, a tributary of SalweenRiver | 99.385E | 22.574N | 5 | 5 | – | – | ||||
Hap 81;
#one of the individuals represented Hap 48.
Figure 2Geographic distribution of sample sites and the frequency of lineages and sublineages at each site. Circle area is proportional to the sample size.
: Mekong River; : Lixian River; : Red River.
Genetic distances among 5 major lineages based on p distance. Net genetic distances estimated based on the Cyt b data set are above the diagonal, net genetic distances estimated based on the D-loop data set are below the diagonal.
| MK-A | MK-B | RL | LX | SW | |
| MK-A | 0.016±0.003 | 0.019±0.004 | 0.024±0.004 | 0.033±0.005 | |
| MK-B | 0.018±0.003 | 0.017±0.003 | 0.023±0.004 | 0.029±0.004 | |
| RL | 0.019±0.004 | 0.016±0.003 | 0.024±0.004 | 0.028±0.004 | |
| LX | 0.025±0.004 | 0.022±0.004 | 0.021±0.004 | 0.024±0.004 | |
| SW | 0.035±0.005 | 0.037±0.006 | 0.026±0.005 | 0.031±0.006 |
Figure 3Mismatch distribution analysis of major lineages or sub-lineages of P. huangchuchieni based on control region sequences.
Statistics of genetic diversity, tests of neutrality, and demographic parameters estimated for the major lineages and sublineages. These data were defaulted when number of individuals in a population was less than 10.
| No. of individuals | No. of haplotypes | Haplotype diversity | Nucleotide diversity | Tajima’D | Fu’s | Tau | T(KY) | |
| MK-A | 166 | 54 | 0.9593±0.0068 | 0.0110±0.0056 | −0.0762 | −8.804 | – | – |
| MK-B | 77 | 28 | 0.9482±0.0097 | 0.0143±0.0072 | 0.112 | −6.842 | 5.449 | 140 |
| RL | 39 | 26 | 0.9771±0.0109 | 0.0183±0.0092 | −0.342 | −2.828 | – | – |
| LX | 22 | 13 | 0.9328±0.0299 | 0.0171±0.0088 | −0.040 | −0.664 | – | – |
| SW | 5 | 5 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| MK-A1 | 119 | 39 | 0.9427±0.011 | 0.0060±0.0032 | –1.256 | –16.48 | 3.906 | 100 |
| MK-A2 | 47 | 16 | 0.9056±0.020 | 0.0083±0.0044 | –0.536 | 0.112 | – | – |
| LX-1 | 17 | 9 | 0.8824±0.0513 | 0.0022±0.0015 | –0.912 | –3.48 | 2.229 | 60 |
P<0.05.
Figure 4Canonical variate analysis (CVA) based on morphological characters of inferred mitochondrial lineages of P. huangchuchieni.
Factor loadings for the 10 highest measured variables and canonical correlations of the differentiation analysis for the 5 main lineages.
| Variable | Axis 1 | Variable | Axis 2 |
| X3 |
| Y4 |
|
| X4 |
| Y7 |
|
| X9 | –0.3194 | Y10 | –0.3603 |
| Y1 | 0.2499 | X8 | –0.2847 |
| Y7 | –0.2415 | X1 | 0.2244 |
| Y10 | –0.1909 | Y6 | 0.2212 |
| Y5 | –0.1738 | X4 | 0.1940 |
| Y11 | 0.1628 | Y5 | 0.1864 |
| X2 | 0.1652 | X9 | –0.1802 |
| X7 | –0.1441 | Y1 | 0.1759 |
Figure 5Locations of landmarks on the body surface of P. huangchuchieni.
Note: 1: Tip of the mouth, junction of premaxilary and ethmoid; 2: Center of eyes; 3: Former basal point of dorsal fin; 4: Posterior basal point of dorsal fin; 5: Upper basal point of tail fin; 6: Centre basal point of tail fin; 7: Abdominal basal point of tail fin; 8: Posterior basal point of anal fin; 9: Former basal point of anal fin; 10: Former basal point of ventral fin; 11: Former basal point of pectoral fin.