| Literature DB >> 28924497 |
Bin Wang1, Feng Xie1, Jiannan Li2, Gang Wang1, Cheng Li1, Jianping Jiang1.
Abstract
The largest plateau Tibetan Plateau supplied an excellent opportunity to investigate the influence of the Pleistocene events on the high-elevation species. To test for the alternative hypotheses of Pleistocene glacial refugia, we used partial sequences of two mitochondrial genes and one nuclear gene to examine the phylogeographic patterns of the endemic frog species Nanorana pleskei across its known range in the eastern Tibetan Plateau, and conducted species distribution modelling (SDM) to explore changes of its distribution range through current and paleo periods. In all data sets, the species was divided into lineage north occupying open plateau platform and lineage south colonizing the mountainous plateau. The divergence of two major clades was estimated at the early Pleistocene. In mtDNA, lineage north contained northeastern and northwestern sublineages, and lineage south had two overlapping-distributed sublineages. Different lineages possessed distinct demographic characteristics, i.e., subdivision in the northeastern sublineage, historical bottleneck effects and recent expansions in the northwestern sublineage and the southeastern sublineage. SDMs depicted that stable suitable habitats had existed in the upper-middle streams of the Yellow River, Dadu River, Jinsha River and Yalong River. These regions were also recognized as the ancestral areas of different lineages. In conclusion, Nanorana pleskei lineages have probably experienced long-term separations. Stable suitable habitats existing in upper-middle streams of major rivers on the eastern Tibetan Plateau and distinct demographic dynamics of different lineages indicated that the lineages possessed independent evolutionary processes in multiple glacial refugia. The findings verified the profound effects of Pleistocene climatic fluctuations on the plateau endemic species.Entities:
Keywords: Demography; Genetic structure; Multiple refugia; Phylogeography; Species distribution modelling; Tibetan Plateau
Year: 2017 PMID: 28924497 PMCID: PMC5598431 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.3770
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
Figure 1Sampling localities, phylogenetic tree and TCS haplotype network for Nanorana pleskei.
(A) Sampling localities. The pies represent the haplotype (H1–H23; colors for each haplotype refer to C haplotype network) frequency in each population. (B) Phyloengetic tree. Maximum likelihood bootstrap support values/Bayesian posterior probabilities are above the branches. Mean time (Mya) to the most recent common ancestor (TMRCA) with 95% highest posterior density (95% HPD) for the key nodes are given below the relative branches. (C) Haplotype network for mitochondrial DNA data. Colors in the haplotype network represent different haplotypes. Sizes of cycles indicate the haplotype frequencies. Network branches linking the cycles indicate one mutation step; more mutations are represented by dark spots crossed with the branches. (D) Haplotype network for nuclear DNA data. MtDNA lineage South was offwhite, and mtDNA lineage North was dark grey.
Genetic diversity, neutrality tests and mismatch goodness-of-fit tests in the mtDNA lineages.
| mtDNA lineage | Neutrality tests | Goodness-of-fit tests | Mismatch distribution | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tajama’s | Fu’s | SSD ( | HRI ( | |||||
| North | 101 (16) | 0.815 (0.022) | 0.00298 (0.00014) | −0.0105 | −0.3348 | 0.0609 (0.0848) | 0.1078 (0.0485) | Multimodal |
| NW | 33 (4) | 0.278 (0.098) | 0.00019 (0.00007) | −1.3876 | − | 0.0058 (0.4250) | 0.2720 (0.5727) | Unimodal |
| NE | 68 (12) | 0.758 (0.039) | 0.00114 (0.00011) | −1.1488 | −3.6383 | 0.0214 (0.1875) | 0.0873 (0.2308) | Bimodal |
| South | 87 (7) | 0.553 (0.051) | 0.00082 (0.00008) | −0.4970 | −0.5345 | 0.4219 (0.0000) | 0.2147 (0.9851) | Multimodal |
| S1 | 30 (4) | 0.572 (0.052) | 0.00041 (0.00006) | −0.3958 | −0.6853 | 0.0320 (0.0477) | 0.2202 (0.0388) | Bimodal |
| S2 | 57 (3) | 0.070 (0.046) | 0.00007 (0.00005) | −1.6818 | −2.4707 | 0.0015 (0.1247) | 0.8039 (0.8077) | Unimodal |
Notes:
n, number of samples; nh, number of haplotypes; π, nucleotide diversity; hd (s.d.), haplotype diversity with standard deviation; SSD, sum of squared deviation between the observed and expected distribution of pairwise differences; HRI, Harpending’s raggedness index.
Denotes significance at α = 0.05.
Denotes significance at α = 0.01.
Figure 2Surface of the interpolated genetic diversity of Nanorana pleskei.
(A) Hd, haplotype diversity. (B) π, nucleotide diversity. Warmer color indicates higher genetic diversity. The interpolation was conducted under a kriging framework.
Results of analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) of mtDNA data.
| Grouping arrangement | Among groups | Within groups | Within populations |
|---|---|---|---|
| North, south | 88.647 | 83.741 | 98.154 |
| NW, NE, S1, S2 | 95.951 | 39.108 | 97.534 |
| NW, NE, south | 94.317 | 61.842 | 97.832 |
Note:
Lineages (north and south) and sublineages (NW, NE, S1 and S2) were showed in Fig. 1.
Figure 3Mismatch distributions of mtDNA lineages.
(A) All populations. (B) Lineage north. (C) Lineage south. (D) Sublineage NW. (E) Sublineage NE. (F) Sublineage S1. (G) Sublineage S2. The lines indicate the observed frequency of pairwise nucleotide differences between sequences, and the dashed lines are the expected distribution based on a model of sudden population expansion.
Figure 4Species distribution models, hypotheses of habitats stability and spatial genetic patterns of Nanorana pleskei.
(A–C) Species distribution models of Nanorana pleskei under present and paleo periods: (A) present time; (B) LGM–CCSM; (C) LIG. (D) Stability of the niche of Nanorana pleskei through all periods based on a species distribution model. (E) Dispersal networks of Nanorana pleskei depicting the connectivity of populations through suitable habitat. (F) Relative age and areas of ancestral distributions of mtDNA lineages as inferred by RASP. Warmer colors depict higher probability.