Literature DB >> 24281371

Research participants' attitudes towards the confidentiality of genomic sequence information.

Leila Jamal1, Julie C Sapp2, Katie Lewis2, Tatiane Yanes3, Flavia M Facio2, Leslie G Biesecker2, Barbara B Biesecker4.   

Abstract

Respecting the confidentiality of personal data contributed to genomic studies is an important issue for researchers using genomic sequencing in humans. Although most studies adhere to rules of confidentiality, there are different conceptions of confidentiality and why it is important. The resulting ambiguity obscures what is at stake when making tradeoffs between data protection and other goals in research, such as transparency, reciprocity, and public benefit. Few studies have examined why participants in genomic research care about how their information is used. To explore this topic, we conducted semi-structured phone interviews with 30 participants in two National Institutes of Health research protocols using genomic sequencing. Our results show that research participants value confidentiality as a form of control over information about themselves. To the individuals we interviewed, control was valued as a safeguard against discrimination in a climate of uncertainty about future uses of individual genome data. Attitudes towards data sharing were related to the goals of research and details of participants' personal lives. Expectations of confidentiality, trust in researchers, and a desire to advance science were common reasons for willingness to share identifiable data with investigators. Nearly, all participants were comfortable sharing personal data that had been de-identified. These findings suggest that views about confidentiality and data sharing are highly nuanced and are related to the perceived benefits of joining a research study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24281371      PMCID: PMC4350593          DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2013.276

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  26 in total

1.  Qualitative data analysis for health services research: developing taxonomy, themes, and theory.

Authors:  Elizabeth H Bradley; Leslie A Curry; Kelly J Devers
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Revision of the European Data Protection Directive: opportunity or threat for public health monitoring?

Authors:  Fabrizio Carinci; Concetta Tania Di Iorio; Walter Ricciardi; Niek Klazinga; Marieke Verschuuren
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 3.367

3.  From consent to institutions: designing adaptive governance for genomic biobanks.

Authors:  Kieran C O'Doherty; Michael M Burgess; Kelly Edwards; Richard P Gallagher; Alice K Hawkins; Jane Kaye; Veronica McCaffrey; David E Winickoff
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2011-07-02       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  The haystack is made of needles.

Authors:  Sharon F Terry; Robert Shelton; Greg Biggers; Dixie Baker; Kelly Edwards
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2013-03

5.  Genomics really gets personal: how exome and whole genome sequencing challenge the ethical framework of human genetics research.

Authors:  Holly K Tabor; Benjamin E Berkman; Sara Chandros Hull; Michael J Bamshad
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 2.802

6.  Disclosure of personal medical information: differences among parents and affected adults for genetic and nongenetic conditions.

Authors:  Summer Johnson; Nancy E Kass; Marvin Natowicz
Journal:  Genet Test       Date:  2005

7.  The ClinSeq Project: piloting large-scale genome sequencing for research in genomic medicine.

Authors:  Leslie G Biesecker; James C Mullikin; Flavia M Facio; Clesson Turner; Praveen F Cherukuri; Robert W Blakesley; Gerard G Bouffard; Peter S Chines; Pedro Cruz; Nancy F Hansen; Jamie K Teer; Baishali Maskeri; Alice C Young; Teri A Manolio; Alexander F Wilson; Toren Finkel; Paul Hwang; Andrew Arai; Alan T Remaley; Vandana Sachdev; Robert Shamburek; Richard O Cannon; Eric D Green
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  Public opinion about the importance of privacy in biobank research.

Authors:  David J Kaufman; Juli Murphy-Bollinger; Joan Scott; Kathy L Hudson
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Patient-controlled encrypted genomic data: an approach to advance clinical genomics.

Authors:  Yannis J Trakadis
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 3.063

10.  Approaches to informed consent for hypothesis-testing and hypothesis-generating clinical genomics research.

Authors:  Flavia M Facio; Julie C Sapp; Amy Linn; Leslie G Biesecker
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 3.063

View more
  20 in total

1.  Canadian Research Ethics Board Leadership Attitudes to the Return of Genetic Research Results to Individuals and Their Families.

Authors:  Conrad V Fernandez; P Pearl O'Rourke; Laura M Beskow
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.718

2.  Big Data Privacy in Biomedical Research.

Authors:  Shuang Wang; Luca Bonomi; Wenrui Dai; Feng Chen; Cynthia Cheung; Cinnamon S Bloss; Samuel Cheng; Xiaoqian Jiang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Big Data       Date:  2016-09-13

3.  De-identified genomic data sharing: the research participant perspective.

Authors:  Deborah Goodman; Catherine O Johnson; Deborah Bowen; Megan Smith; Lari Wenzel; Karen Edwards
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2017-04-05

Review 4.  Cases in Precision Medicine: Concerns About Privacy and Discrimination After Genomic Sequencing.

Authors:  Deborah Stiles; Paul S Appelbaum
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Comfort with Pharmacogenetic Testing Amongst Pediatric Oncology Providers and Their Patients.

Authors:  Catriona Mowbray; Joyce Turner; Jiaxiang Gai; Shana Jacobs
Journal:  J Pediatr Hematol Oncol Nurs       Date:  2022 May-Jun

6.  Patient Preferences for Use of Archived Biospecimens from Oncology Trials When Adequacy of Informed Consent Is Unclear.

Authors:  Jeffrey Peppercorn; Eric Campbell; Steve Isakoff; Nora K Horick; Julia Rabin; Katharine Quain; Lecia V Sequist; Aditya Bardia; Deborah Collyar; Fay Hlubocky; Debra Mathews
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-09-06

7.  Increasing participation in genomic research and biobanking through community-based capacity building.

Authors:  Elizabeth Gross Cohn; Maryam Husamudeen; Elaine L Larson; Janet K Williams
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 8.  Health-care professionals' responsibility to patients' relatives in genetic medicine: a systematic review and synthesis of empirical research.

Authors:  Sandi Dheensa; Angela Fenwick; Shiri Shkedi-Rafid; Gillian Crawford; Anneke Lucassen
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 9.  Between Openness and Privacy in Genomics.

Authors:  Effy Vayena; Urs Gasser
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 11.069

10.  Multidisciplinary approach to genomics research in Africa: the AfriCRAN model.

Authors:  Azeez Butali; Peter Mossey; Nikki Tiffin; Wasiu Adeyemo; Mekonen Eshete; Chrispinanus Mumena; Rosemary Audu; Chika Onwuamah; Pius Agbenorku; Mobolanle Ogunlewe; Adetokunbo Adebola; Hecto Olasoji; Babatunde Aregbesola; Ramat Braimah; Abimibola Oladugba; Ifeanyichukwu Onah; Ezekiel Adebiyi; Peter Olaitan; Lukman Abdur-Rahman; Adebowale Adeyemo
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2015-07-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.