Literature DB >> 35467433

Comfort with Pharmacogenetic Testing Amongst Pediatric Oncology Providers and Their Patients.

Catriona Mowbray1, Joyce Turner2, Jiaxiang Gai3, Shana Jacobs1.   

Abstract

Background: Pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing, a component of personalized medicine, aims to ensure treatment efficacy while reducing side effects and symptoms. Before this testing becomes routine in the pediatric oncology population, nurses need to understand the knowledge and concerns of providers, patients, and family members with regard to the timing, extent, interpretation, and incorporation of PGx testing.
Methods: As part of a comprehensive PGx study (larger study) for children diagnosed with cancer, we surveyed providers and caregivers of children with cancer about their knowledge of and comfort with PGx testing. Caregivers who declined to participate in the larger PGx study were also asked to participate in the survey. Chi-square tests and a two-sample t-test were used to compare variables.
Results: One hundred and two participants from the larger PGx study and 12 families who refused (response rate of 77% and 54%, respectively) as well as 29 providers (88%) completed surveys. Families not on the study were less interested in and comfortable with PGx results. Both groups were concerned about health or life insurance discrimination and payment. Providers would like support in ordering PGx testing and interpreting PGx. Discussion: Providers remain wary of most PGx testing, uncomfortable with interpreting and applying the results. Families are interested in the possibilities of personalized prescribing while worried about who has access to their child's genetic information. Further education on relevant tests for providers, including nurses, and the testing process for families, including details on privacy and sharing of genetic information, appear necessary.

Entities:  

Keywords:  education; nursing; patient & family; pediatric; pharmacogenetics

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35467433      PMCID: PMC9462430          DOI: 10.1177/10434542211055999

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Hematol Oncol Nurs        ISSN: 2752-7530


  22 in total

1.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 6.317

Review 2.  Standardization can accelerate the adoption of pharmacogenomics: current status and the path forward.

Authors:  Kelly E Caudle; Nicholas J Keeling; Teri E Klein; Michelle Whirl-Carrillo; Victoria M Pratt; James M Hoffman
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 2.533

Review 3.  Preemptive clinical pharmacogenetics implementation: current programs in five US medical centers.

Authors:  Henry M Dunnenberger; Kristine R Crews; James M Hoffman; Kelly E Caudle; Ulrich Broeckel; Scott C Howard; Robert J Hunkler; Teri E Klein; William E Evans; Mary V Relling
Journal:  Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 13.820

4.  Primary care physicians' knowledge of and experience with pharmacogenetic testing.

Authors:  S B Haga; W Burke; G S Ginsburg; R Mills; R Agans
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 4.438

5.  Research participants' attitudes towards the confidentiality of genomic sequence information.

Authors:  Leila Jamal; Julie C Sapp; Katie Lewis; Tatiane Yanes; Flavia M Facio; Leslie G Biesecker; Barbara B Biesecker
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 6.  Stakeholder views on pharmacogenomic testing.

Authors:  Haridarshan N Patel; Iulia D Ursan; Patrick M Zueger; Larisa H Cavallari; A Simon Pickard
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 4.705

7.  National survey of physicians' perspectives on pharmacogenetic testing in solid organ transplantation.

Authors:  Kimberly M Deininger; Shirley M Tsunoda; Jan D Hirsch; Heather Anderson; Yee Ming Lee; Colleen K McIlvennan; Robert L Page; Jacinda N Tran; Christina L Aquilante
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 2.863

8.  Deliberations about clinical pharmacogenetic testing in pediatric oncology.

Authors:  Amalia M Issa; Sarah Ae Aboushawareb; David D Eisenstat; Greg Mt Guilcher; Geoffrey Liu; S Rod Rassekh; Caron Strahlendorf; Gesche Tallen; Reo Tanoshima; Bruce Carleton
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 2.512

9.  Survey of US public attitudes toward pharmacogenetic testing.

Authors:  S B Haga; J M O'Daniel; G M Tindall; I R Lipkus; R Agans
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 3.550

10.  Multi-site investigation of strategies for the clinical implementation of CYP2D6 genotyping to guide drug prescribing.

Authors:  Larisa H Cavallari; Sara L Van Driest; Cynthia A Prows; Jeffrey R Bishop; Nita A Limdi; Victoria M Pratt; Laura B Ramsey; D Max Smith; Sony Tuteja; Benjamin Q Duong; J Kevin Hicks; James C Lee; Aniwaa Owusu Obeng; Amber L Beitelshees; Gillian C Bell; Kathryn Blake; Daniel J Crona; Lynn Dressler; Ryan A Gregg; Lindsay J Hines; Stuart A Scott; Richard C Shelton; Kristin Wiisanen Weitzel; Julie A Johnson; Josh F Peterson; Philip E Empey; Todd C Skaar
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 8.822

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.