Literature DB >> 24275890

Computed tomography quantification of bone density adjacent to cemented pegged polyethylene glenoid components in shoulder arthroplasty.

Giovanni Merolla1, Barbara Amore, Paolo Paladini, Enrico Cavagna, Giuseppe Porcellini.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cemented polyethylene devices are the prostheses implanted more frequently, but there is no agreement on the optimal glenoid component design. In this study, bone mineral density (BMD) adjacent to cemented all-polyethylene glenoid components was assessed to gain insights into the characteristics of glenoid bone as a potential risk factor implicated in the failure of shoulder arthroplasty. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-two subjects were examined at an average follow-up of 31 months using the Constant-Murley score (CS) and multi-detector computed tomography. BMD was measured in 5 regions of interest (ROIs) at the sites where radiolucent lines are usually detected. BMD differences among the ROIs were tested. The relationship between BMD and a number of variables (CS subscores, age, gender, follow-up duration) was explored.
RESULTS: There was a significant increase in CS scores (p<0.05). Significantly different BMD (p=0.0039) was found in the 5 ROIs, especially between ROIs 2 and 5 (p=0.016, Bonferroni's test) and between ROIs 3 and 5 (p=0.005, Bonferroni's test). BMD was lower in ROI 1 than ROI 3 and in ROI 2 than ROI 4, but the difference was not significant. DISCUSSION: The heterogeneous BMD distribution may be related to: (1) an interindividual variability in glenoid BMD; (2) the fixation technique; or (3) the different bone response to eccentric loading of the prosthetic head on the glenoid component.
CONCLUSIONS: BMD analysis may contribute to extent our knowledge on glenoid component loosening and encourage further techniques of glenoid fixation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24275890     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-013-1368-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  35 in total

1.  Glenoid morphology after reaming in computer-simulated total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Charlie Yongpravat; Jonathan D Lester; Comron Saifi; Alen Trubelja; R Michael Greiwe; Louis U Bigliani; William N Levine; Thomas R Gardner; Christopher S Ahmad
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2012-04-21       Impact factor: 3.019

2.  Periacetabular bone changes after uncemented total hip arthroplasty evaluated by quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  Lutz Arne Mueller; Alexander Kress; Tobias Nowak; David Pfander; Rocco Paolo Pitto; Raimund Forst; Rainer Schmidt
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.717

3.  The effect of cementing technique on structural fixation of pegged glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Richard W Nyffeler; Dominik Meyer; Ralph Sheikh; Bruno J Koller; Christian Gerber
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.019

4.  Mineralisation and mechanical strength of the glenoid cavity subchondral bone plate.

Authors:  Marko Kraljević; Valentin Zumstein; Dieter Wirz; Rolf Hügli; Magdalena Müller-Gerbl
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Results of anatomic nonconstrained prosthesis in primary osteoarthritis with biconcave glenoid.

Authors:  Gilles Walch; Claudio Moraga; Allan Young; Juan Castellanos-Rosas
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  Radiographic comparison of flat-back and convex-back glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Istvan Szabo; Florent Buscayret; T Bradley Edwards; Chantal Nemoz; Pascal Boileau; Gilles Walch
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.019

7.  Total shoulder arthroplasty with an all-polyethylene pegged bone-ingrowth glenoid component: a clinical and radiographic outcome study.

Authors:  Michael A Wirth; Rebecca Loredo; Glen Garcia; Charles A Rockwood; Carleton Southworth; Joseph P Iannotti
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Artifacts in CT: recognition and avoidance.

Authors:  Julia F Barrett; Nicholas Keat
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.333

9.  Morphologic study of the glenoid in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis.

Authors:  G Walch; R Badet; A Boulahia; A Khoury
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Patient and physician-assessed shoulder function after arthroplasty.

Authors:  Adam M Smith; Sunni A Barnes; John W Sperling; Christopher M Farrell; Joel D Cummings; Robert H Cofield
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  2 in total

1.  Total shoulder replacement using a bone ingrowth central peg polyethylene glenoid component: a prospective clinical and computed tomography study with short- to mid-term follow-up.

Authors:  Giovanni Merolla; Giovanni Ciaramella; Elisabetta Fabbri; Gilles Walch; Paolo Paladini; Giuseppe Porcellini
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Is preoperative glenoid bone mineral density associated with aseptic glenoid implant loosening in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty?

Authors:  Sandrine Mariaux; Raphaël Obrist; Alain Farron; Fabio Becce; Alexandre Terrier
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 2.362

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.