Literature DB >> 22298059

Total shoulder arthroplasty with an all-polyethylene pegged bone-ingrowth glenoid component: a clinical and radiographic outcome study.

Michael A Wirth1, Rebecca Loredo, Glen Garcia, Charles A Rockwood, Carleton Southworth, Joseph P Iannotti.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Loosening of the glenoid component continues to be the foremost cause of medium and long-term failure of shoulder replacements. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic results of a minimally cemented all-polyethylene pegged glenoid component designed for biologic fixation.
METHODS: Forty-four shoulders in forty-one patients with a mean age of sixty-six years underwent total shoulder arthroplasty with a pegged bone-ingrowth glenoid component. Outcome data included the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons questionnaire, the Simple Shoulder Test, and visual analog scales. A detailed radiographic analysis was performed by two board-certified musculoskeletal radiologists who were blinded to clinical and patient-reported outcomes. The radiographs were evaluated with regard to the presence of radiolucent lines at the bone-cement interface, implant seating, and the radiodensity between the flanges of the central peg.
RESULTS: The mean duration of clinical follow-up was four years and the mean duration of radiographic follow-up was three years. Twenty shoulders had perfect seating and radiolucency grades, thirty had increased radiodensity between the flanges of the central peg, and three demonstrated osteolysis. Radiodensity about the uncemented central peg at the time of the latest follow-up was positively associated with perfect seating and radiolucency grades on the initial postoperative radiographs (p = 0.03, Fisher exact test). The Simple Shoulder Test score, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, and all visual analog scale scores had improved significantly (p < 0.01) at the time of the latest follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Total shoulder arthroplasty with a minimally cemented, all-polyethylene, pegged glenoid implant can yield stable and durable fixation at short to medium-term follow-up (mean, four years).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22298059     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01400

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  28 in total

1.  One and two-year clinical outcomes for a polyethylene glenoid with a fluted peg: one thousand two hundred seventy individual patients from eleven centers.

Authors:  Frederick A Matsen; Joseph P Iannotti; R Sean Churchill; Lieven De Wilde; T Bradley Edwards; Matthew C Evans; Edward V Fehringer; Gordon I Groh; James D Kelly; Christopher M Kilian; Giovanni Merolla; Tom R Norris; Giuseppe Porcellini; Edwin E Spencer; Anne Vidil; Michael A Wirth; Stacy M Russ; Moni Neradilek; Jeremy S Somerson
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Journey of the glenoid in anatomic total shoulder replacement.

Authors:  Alessandro Castagna; Raffaele Garofalo
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2018-08-01

3.  Axillary view: arthritic glenohumeral anatomy and changes after ream and run.

Authors:  Frederick A Matsen; Akash Gupta
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Long-term survival of the glenoid components in total shoulder replacement for arthritis.

Authors:  Dominique F Gazielly; Marius M Scarlat; Olivier Verborgt
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  What Are the Complications, Survival, and Outcomes After Revision to Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty in Patients Older Than 80 Years?

Authors:  Eduard Alentorn-Geli; Nicholas J Clark; Andrew T Assenmacher; Brian T Samuelsen; Joaquín Sánchez-Sotelo; Robert H Cofield; John W Sperling
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  No differences in early results of a hybrid glenoid compared with a pegged implant.

Authors:  Lawrence V Gulotta; K Lauchlan Chambers; Russell F Warren; David M Dines; Edward V Craig
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Does Postoperative Glenoid Retroversion Affect the 2-Year Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes for Total Shoulder Arthroplasty?

Authors:  Benjamin C Service; Jason E Hsu; Jeremy S Somerson; Stacy M Russ; Frederick A Matsen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  The V-shaped subscapularis tenotomy for anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Daniel J H Henderson; Thomas J Christensen; Austin Vo; Johannes E Plath; Ion-Andrei Popescu; Laurent Lafosse
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  What Factors are Predictive of Patient-reported Outcomes? A Prospective Study of 337 Shoulder Arthroplasties.

Authors:  Frederick A Matsen; Stacy M Russ; Phuong T Vu; Jason E Hsu; Robert M Lucas; Bryan A Comstock
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Total shoulder replacement using a bone ingrowth central peg polyethylene glenoid component: a prospective clinical and computed tomography study with short- to mid-term follow-up.

Authors:  Giovanni Merolla; Giovanni Ciaramella; Elisabetta Fabbri; Gilles Walch; Paolo Paladini; Giuseppe Porcellini
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.