Literature DB >> 24273742

Multi-functionality of computer-aided quantitative vertebral fracture morphometry analyses.

Ling Oei1, Felisia Ly, Salih El Saddy, Ater A Makurthou, Albert Hofman, Frank J A van Rooij, André G Uitterlinden, M Carola Zillikens, Fernando Rivadeneira, Edwin H G Oei.   

Abstract

Osteoporotic vertebral fractures are an increasingly active area of research. Oftentimes assessments are performed by software-assisted quantitative morphometry. Here, we will discuss multi-functionality of these data for research purposes. A team of trained research assistants processed lateral spine radiographs from the population-based Rotterdam Study with SpineAnalyzer(®) software (Optasia Medical Ltd, Cheadle, UK). Next, the raw coordinate data of the two upper corners of Th5 and the two lower corners of Th12 were extracted to calculate the Cobb's kyphosis angle. In addition, two readers performed independent manual measurements of the Cobb's kyphosis angle between Th5 and Th12 for a sample (n=99). The mean kyphosis angle and its standard deviation were 53° and 10° for the SpineAnalyzer(®) software measurements and 54° and 12° by manual measurements, respectively. The Pearson's correlation coefficient was 0.65 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.53-0.75; P=2×10(-13)]. There was a substantial intraclass correlation with a coefficient of 0.64 (95% CI: 0.51-0.74). The mean difference between methods was 1° (95% CI: -2°-4°), with 95% limits of agreement of -20°-17° and there were no systematic biases. In conclusion, vertebral fracture morphometry data can be used to derive the Cobb's kyphosis angle. Even more quantitative measures could be derived from the raw data, such as vertebral wedging, intervertebral disc space, spondylolisthesis and the lordosis angle. These measures may be of interest for research into musculoskeletal disorders such as osteoporosis, degenerative disease or Scheuermann's disease. Large-scale studies may benefit from efficient capture of multiple quantitative measures in the spine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Vertebral fracture; degenerative disease; morphometry; osteoporosis; post-processing; quantitative; software; spine

Year:  2013        PMID: 24273742      PMCID: PMC3834208          DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-4292.2013.09.03

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg        ISSN: 2223-4306


  32 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain.

Authors:  B W Koes; M W van Tulder; S Thomas
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-06-17

2.  Measurement of scoliosis and kyphosis radiographs. Intraobserver and interobserver variation.

Authors:  D L Carman; R H Browne; J G Birch
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 3.  The clinical impact of vertebral fractures: quality of life in women with osteoporosis.

Authors:  D T Gold
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Measurement of anterior vertebral compressions and biconcave vertebrae.

Authors:  L M Hurxthal
Journal:  Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med       Date:  1968-07

5.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005-2025.

Authors:  Russel Burge; Bess Dawson-Hughes; Daniel H Solomon; John B Wong; Alison King; Anna Tosteson
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Heritability of prevalent vertebral fracture and volumetric bone mineral density and geometry at the lumbar spine in three generations of the Framingham study.

Authors:  Ching-Ti Liu; David Karasik; Yanhua Zhou; Yi-Hsiang Hsu; Harry K Genant; Kerry E Broe; Thomas F Lang; Elizabeth J Samelson; Serkalem Demissie; Mary L Bouxsein; L Adrienne Cupples; Douglas P Kiel
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 8.  Red flags to screen for vertebral fracture in patients presenting with low-back pain.

Authors:  Christopher M Williams; Nicholas Henschke; Christopher G Maher; Maurits W van Tulder; Bart W Koes; Petra Macaskill; Les Irwig
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-01-31

9.  Vertebral bone-marrow changes in degenerative lumbar disc disease. An MRI study of 74 patients with low back pain.

Authors:  T Toyone; K Takahashi; H Kitahara; M Yamagata; M Murakami; H Moriya
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1994-09

10.  The Rotterdam Study: 2012 objectives and design update.

Authors:  Albert Hofman; Cornelia M van Duijn; Oscar H Franco; M Arfan Ikram; Harry L A Janssen; Caroline C W Klaver; Ernst J Kuipers; Tamar E C Nijsten; Bruno H Ch Stricker; Henning Tiemeier; André G Uitterlinden; Meike W Vernooij; Jacqueline C M Witteman
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 8.082

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Identifying osteoporotic vertebral endplate and cortex fractures.

Authors:  Yì Xiáng J Wáng; Fernando Ruiz Santiago; Min Deng; Marcello H Nogueira-Barbosa
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2017-10

Review 2.  Quantitative imaging methods in osteoporosis.

Authors:  Ling Oei; Fjorda Koromani; Fernando Rivadeneira; M Carola Zillikens; Edwin H G Oei
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2016-12

Review 3.  Opportunistic diagnosis of osteoporosis, fragile bone strength and vertebral fractures from routine CT scans; a review of approved technology systems and pathways to implementation.

Authors:  Veena Aggarwal; Christina Maslen; Richard L Abel; Pinaki Bhattacharya; Paul A Bromiley; Emma M Clark; Juliet E Compston; Nicola Crabtree; Jennifer S Gregory; Eleni P Kariki; Nicholas C Harvey; Kate A Ward; Kenneth E S Poole
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 5.346

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.