BACKGROUND: This investigation used image data generated by a physical phantom over a wide range of count statistics to evaluate the effectiveness of several of the newer commercially available SPECT reconstruction iterative algorithms (IRR) in improving perfusion defect contrast and spatial resolution, while controlling image noise. METHODS: A cardiac phantom was imaged using four different gamma cameras over a wide range of counts statistics (from 6 to 0.8 Mcounts). Images were reconstructed with FBP, OSEM, and the IRR available on site. IRR were applied without corrections (IRR NC), with attenuation correction (IRR AC), scatter correction (IRR SC), and attenuation + scatter corrections (IRR SCAC). Four image performance indices related to spatial resolution, contrast, and image noise were analyzed. RESULTS: IRR NC always determined significant improvements in all indices in comparison to FBP or OSEM. Improvements were emphasized with IRR SC and IRR SCAC. Count reduction from 6 to 1.5 Mcounts did not impair the performances of any of the considered indices. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study comparing the relative performance of different, commercially available, IRR software, over a wide range of count statistics; the additional effect of scatter and attenuation corrections, alone or in combination, was also evaluated. Our results confirm that IRR algorithms produce substantial benefits with respect to conventional FBP or OSEM reconstruction methods, as assessed through different figures of merit, in particular when SC and/or SCAC are also included.
BACKGROUND: This investigation used image data generated by a physical phantom over a wide range of count statistics to evaluate the effectiveness of several of the newer commercially available SPECT reconstruction iterative algorithms (IRR) in improving perfusion defect contrast and spatial resolution, while controlling image noise. METHODS: A cardiac phantom was imaged using four different gamma cameras over a wide range of counts statistics (from 6 to 0.8 Mcounts). Images were reconstructed with FBP, OSEM, and the IRR available on site. IRR were applied without corrections (IRR NC), with attenuation correction (IRR AC), scatter correction (IRR SC), and attenuation + scatter corrections (IRR SCAC). Four image performance indices related to spatial resolution, contrast, and image noise were analyzed. RESULTS: IRR NC always determined significant improvements in all indices in comparison to FBP or OSEM. Improvements were emphasized with IRR SC and IRR SCAC. Count reduction from 6 to 1.5 Mcounts did not impair the performances of any of the considered indices. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study comparing the relative performance of different, commercially available, IRR software, over a wide range of count statistics; the additional effect of scatter and attenuation corrections, alone or in combination, was also evaluated. Our results confirm that IRR algorithms produce substantial benefits with respect to conventional FBP or OSEM reconstruction methods, as assessed through different figures of merit, in particular when SC and/or SCAC are also included.
Authors: Salvador Borges-Neto; Robert A Pagnanelli; Linda K Shaw; Emily Honeycutt; Shuli C Shwartz; George L Adams; Ralph Edward Coleman Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Lotte H Enevoldsen; Changez A K Menashi; Ulrik B Andersen; Lars T Jensen; Otto M Henriksen Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2013-08-21 Impact factor: 5.952