Literature DB >> 29043555

Impact of non-specific normal databases on perfusion quantification of low-dose myocardial SPECT studies.

Camilla Scabbio1, Orazio Zoccarato2, Simona Malaspina3, Giovanni Lucignani3,4, Angelo Del Sole5,6, Michela Lecchi1.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the impact of non-specific normal databases on the percent summed rest score (SR%) and stress score (SS%) from simulated low-dose SPECT studies by shortening the acquisition time/projection.
METHODS: Forty normal-weight and 40 overweight/obese patients underwent myocardial studies with a conventional gamma-camera (BrightView, Philips) using three different acquisition times/projection: 30, 15, and 8 s (100%-counts, 50%-counts, and 25%-counts scan, respectively) and reconstructed using the iterative algorithm with resolution recovery (IRR) AstonishTM (Philips). Three sets of normal databases were used: (1) full-counts IRR; (2) half-counts IRR; and (3) full-counts traditional reconstruction algorithm database (TRAD). The impact of these databases and the acquired count statistics on the SR% and SS% was assessed by ANOVA analysis and Tukey test (P < 0.05).
RESULTS: Significantly higher SR% and SS% values (> 40%) were found for the full-counts TRAD databases respect to the IRR databases. For overweight/obese patients, significantly higher SS% values for 25%-counts scans (+19%) are confirmed compared to those of 50%-counts scan, independently of using the half-counts or the full-counts IRR databases.
CONCLUSIONS: AstonishTM requires the adoption of the own specific normal databases in order to prevent very high overestimation of both stress and rest perfusion scores. Conversely, the count statistics of the normal databases seems not to influence the quantification scores.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Myocardial perfusion imaging; gated SPECT; iterative reconstruction; normality databases; patient dose

Year:  2017        PMID: 29043555     DOI: 10.1007/s12350-017-1079-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


  18 in total

Review 1.  Quantitative analysis of perfusion studies: strengths and pitfalls.

Authors:  Piotr Slomka; Yuan Xu; Daniel Berman; Guido Germano
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  The increasing role of quantification in clinical nuclear cardiology: the Emory approach.

Authors:  Ernest V Garcia; Tracy L Faber; C David Cooke; Russell D Folks; Ji Chen; Cesar Santana
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Corridor4DM: the Michigan method for quantitative nuclear cardiology.

Authors:  Edward P Ficaro; Benjamin C Lee; James N Kritzman; James R Corbett
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Comparative analysis of full-time, half-time, and quarter-time myocardial ECG-gated SPECT quantification in normal-weight and overweight patients.

Authors:  M Lecchi; I Martinelli; O Zoccarato; C Maioli; Giovanni Lucignani; A Del Sole
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Quantification with normal limits: New cameras and low-dose imaging.

Authors:  Piotr J Slomka; Mathieu Rubeaux; Guido Germano
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Differences in polar-map patterns using the novel technologies for myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Orazio Zoccarato; Claudio Marcassa; Domenico Lizio; Lucia Leva; Giovanni Lucignani; Annarita Savi; Camilla Scabbio; Roberta Matheoud; Michela Lecchi; Marco Brambilla
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Myocardial perfusion and left ventricular quantitative parameters obtained using gated myocardial SPECT: Comparison of three software packages.

Authors:  Sotiria Alexiou; Panagiotis Georgoulias; George Angelidis; Varvara Valotassiou; Ioannis Tsougos; Dimitrios Psimadas; Velissarios Lakiotis; Agaristi Kaspiri; Dimitrios Alexopoulos; Dimitrios Apostolopoulos; Pavlos Vassilakos
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  Normal Databases for the Relative Quantification of Myocardial Perfusion.

Authors:  Mathieu Rubeaux; Yuan Xu; Guido Germano; Daniel S Berman; Piotr J Slomka
Journal:  Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep       Date:  2016-06-30

9.  Quantitative Tc-99m sestamibi attenuation-corrected SPECT: development and multicenter trial validation of myocardial perfusion stress gender-independent normal database in an obese population.

Authors:  Gabriel B Grossman; Ernest V Garcia; Timothy M Bateman; Gary V Heller; Lynne L Johnson; Russell D Folks; S James Cullom; James R Galt; James A Case; Cesar A Santana; Raghuveer K Halkar
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.952

10.  Investigation of dose reduction in cardiac perfusion SPECT via optimization and choice of the image reconstruction strategy.

Authors:  Albert Juan Ramon; Yongyi Yang; P Hendrik Pretorius; Piotr J Slomka; Karen L Johnson; Michael A King; Miles N Wernick
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 3.872

View more
  3 in total

1.  Time-of-flight in cardiac PET/TC: What do we know and what we should know?

Authors:  Roberta Matheoud; Michela Lecchi
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Automatic evaluation of myocardial perfusion on SPECT: Need for "Normality".

Authors:  Riccardo Liga; Alessia Gimelli
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Impact of iterative reconstruction with resolution recovery in myocardial perfusion SPECT: phantom and clinical studies.

Authors:  Koichi Okuda; Kenichi Nakajima; Hiroto Yoneyama; Takayuki Shibutani; Masahisa Onoguchi; Shinro Matsuo; Mitsumasa Hashimoto; Seigo Kinuya
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.