Literature DB >> 35020012

Influence of diabetes mellitus on the diagnostic performance of machine learning-based coronary CT angiography-derived fractional flow reserve: a multicenter study.

Yi Xue1, Min Wen Zheng2, Yang Hou3, Fan Zhou4, Jian Hua Li5, Yi Ning Wang6, Chun Yu Liu4, Chang Sheng Zhou4, Jia Yin Zhang7, Meng Meng Yu7, Bo Zhang8, Dai Min Zhang9, Yan Yi6, Lei Xu10, Xiu Hua Hu11, Guang Ming Lu4, Chun Xiang Tang1,4, Long Jiang Zhang12,13.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine the diagnostic accuracy of machine learning-based coronary CT angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (FFRCT) in diabetes mellitus (DM) patients.
METHODS: In total, 484 patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease from 11 Chinese medical centers were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent CCTA, FFRCT, and invasive FFR. The patients were further grouped into mild (25~49 %), moderate (50~69 %), and severe (≥ 70 %) according to CCTA stenosis degree and Agatston score < 400 and Agatston score ≥ 400 groups according to coronary artery calcium severity. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to match DM (n  = 112) and non-DM (n  = 214) groups. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the curve (AUC) with 95 % confidence interval (CI) were calculated and compared.
RESULTS: Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and AUC of FFRCT were 0.79, 0.96, 0.87, and 0.91 in DM patients and 0.82, 0.93, 0.89, and 0.89 in non-DM patients without significant difference (all p > 0.05) on a per-patient level. The accuracies of FFRCT had no significant difference among different coronary stenosis subgroups and between two coronary calcium subgroups (all p > 0.05) in the DM and non-DM groups. After PSM grouping, the accuracies of FFRCT were 0.88 in the DM group and 0.87 in the non-DM group without a statistical difference (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: DM has no negative impact on the diagnostic accuracy of machine learning-based FFRCT. KEY POINTS: • ML-based FFRCT has a high discriminative accuracy of hemodynamic ischemia, which is not affected by DM. • FFRCT was superior to the CCTA alone for the detection of ischemia relevance of coronary artery stenosis in both DM and non-DM patients. • Coronary calcification had no significant effect on the diagnostic accuracy of FFRCT to detect ischemia in DM patients.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computed tomography angiography; Coronary artery disease; Diabetes mellitus; Fractional flow reserve; Machine learning

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35020012     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-08468-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  43 in total

1.  Economic evaluation of fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel disease.

Authors:  William F Fearon; Bernhard Bornschein; Pim A L Tonino; Raffaella M Gothe; Bernard De Bruyne; Nico H J Pijls; Uwe Siebert
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-11-29       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Increased basal coronary blood flow as a cause of reduced coronary flow reserve in diabetic patients.

Authors:  Andrea Picchi; Ugo Limbruno; Marta Focardi; Bernardo Cortese; Andrea Micheli; Letizia Boschi; Silva Severi; Raffaele De Caterina
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 4.733

3.  Fractional Flow Reserve and Cardiac Events in Coronary Artery Disease: Data From a Prospective IRIS-FFR Registry (Interventional Cardiology Research Incooperation Society Fractional Flow Reserve).

Authors:  Jung-Min Ahn; Duk-Woo Park; Eun-Seok Shin; Bon-Kwon Koo; Chang-Wook Nam; Joon-Hyung Doh; Jun Hong Kim; In-Ho Chae; Jung-Han Yoon; Sung-Ho Her; Ki-Bae Seung; Woo-Young Chung; Sang-Yong Yoo; Jin Bae Lee; Si Wan Choi; Kyungil Park; Taek Jong Hong; Sang Yeub Lee; Minkyu Han; Pil Hyung Lee; Soo-Jin Kang; Seung-Whan Lee; Young-Hak Kim; Cheol Whan Lee; Seong-Wook Park; Seung-Jung Park
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Pim A L Tonino; Bernard De Bruyne; Nico H J Pijls; Uwe Siebert; Fumiaki Ikeno; Marcel van' t Veer; Volker Klauss; Ganesh Manoharan; Thomas Engstrøm; Keith G Oldroyd; Peter N Ver Lee; Philip A MacCarthy; William F Fearon
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Coronary CT angiography derived fractional flow reserve: Methodology and evaluation of a point of care algorithm.

Authors:  Adriaan Coenen; Marisa M Lubbers; Akira Kurata; Atsushi Kono; Admir Dedic; Raluca G Chelu; Marcel L Dijkshoorn; Robert-Jan M van Geuns; Max Schoebinger; Lucian Itu; Puneet Sharma; Koen Nieman
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr       Date:  2015-12-18

6.  Diagnostic accuracy of fractional flow reserve from anatomic CT angiography.

Authors:  James K Min; Jonathon Leipsic; Michael J Pencina; Daniel S Berman; Bon-Kwon Koo; Carlos van Mieghem; Andrejs Erglis; Fay Y Lin; Allison M Dunning; Patricia Apruzzese; Matthew J Budoff; Jason H Cole; Farouc A Jaffer; Martin B Leon; Jennifer Malpeso; G B John Mancini; Seung-Jung Park; Robert S Schwartz; Leslee J Shaw; Laura Mauri
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 7.  Clinical Update: Cardiovascular Disease in Diabetes Mellitus: Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease and Heart Failure in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - Mechanisms, Management, and Clinical Considerations.

Authors:  Cecilia C Low Wang; Connie N Hess; William R Hiatt; Allison B Goldfine
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Impact of type 2 diabetes mellitus and glucose control on fractional flow reserve measurements in intermediate grade coronary lesions.

Authors:  Sebastian Reith; Simone Battermann; Martin Hellmich; Nikolaus Marx; Mathias Burgmaier
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 5.460

9.  Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial.

Authors:  Matthew J Budoff; David Dowe; James G Jollis; Michael Gitter; John Sutherland; Edward Halamert; Markus Scherer; Raye Bellinger; Arthur Martin; Robert Benton; Augustin Delago; James K Min
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Fractional flow reserve and pressure-bounded coronary flow reserve to predict outcomes in coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Jung-Min Ahn; Frederik M Zimmermann; Nils P Johnson; Eun-Seok Shin; Bon-Kwon Koo; Pil Hyung Lee; Duk-Woo Park; Soo-Jin Kang; Seung-Whan Lee; Young-Hak Kim; Cheol Whan Lee; Seong-Wook Park; Nico H J Pijls; Seung-Jung Park
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 29.983

View more
  1 in total

1.  CT-Based Leiden Score Outperforms Confirm Score in Predicting Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events for Diabetic Patients with Suspected Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Zinuan Liu; Yipu Ding; Guanhua Dou; Xi Wang; Dongkai Shan; Bai He; Jing Jing; Yundai Chen; Junjie Yang
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 7.109

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.