Literature DB >> 27307094

Comparison of standard- and high-dose intracoronary adenosine for the measurement of coronary fractional flow reserve (FFR).

Jens Röther1, Stephan Achenbach2, Monique Tröbs2, Florian Blachutzik2, Holger Nef3, Mohamed Marwan2, Christian Schlundt2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Measurement of fractional flow reserve (FFR) by intravenous infusion or intracoronary injection of adenosine is the reference method to determine the hemodynamic relevance of coronary artery stenoses. The goal of this prospective study was to compare standard (40 µg adenosine for the right and 80 µg for the left coronary artery) to high doses of intracoronary adenosine for FFR measurement. METHODS AND
RESULTS: In 130 intermediate coronary artery stenoses, two sequential FFR measurements were performed with standard-dose intracoronary application of adenosine (40 µg for the right and 80 μg for the left coronary artery), followed by one FFR measurement with a bolus of 200 μg for the right and 400 μg for the left coronary artery. There was strong correlation (r = 0.97, p < 0.001) between FFR values determined with standard-dose adenosine (0.86 ± 0.08) versus high-dose adenosine (0.85 ± 0.08). High-dose adenosine did not yield FFR values ≤0.80 or ≤0.75 significantly more frequently than standard-dose adenosine. Patients reported more discomfort after high-dose adenosine application compared to standard-dose adenosine (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: For FFR measurements with intracoronary adenosine injection, results achieved with doses of 40 µg adenosine for the right and 80 µg for the left coronary artery display no clinically relevant difference to doses of 200 and 400 µg, respectively.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coronary intervention; Fractional flow reserve; Intracoronary adenosine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27307094     DOI: 10.1007/s00392-016-1010-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol        ISSN: 1861-0684            Impact factor:   5.460


  21 in total

1.  A randomized comparison of 4 doses of intracoronary adenosine in the assessment of fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  G Casella; J Rieber; T M Schiele; H-U Stempfle; U Siebert; M Leibig; K Theisen; U Buchmeier; V Klauss
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  2003-08

2.  Are high doses of intracoronary adenosine an alternative to standard intravenous adenosine for the assessment of fractional flow reserve?

Authors:  Gianni Casella; Marcus Leibig; Thomas M Schiele; Reiner Schrepf; Victoria Seelig; Hans-Ulrich Stempfle; Petra Erdin; Johannes Rieber; Andreas König; Uwe Siebert; Volker Klauss
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.749

3.  2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions.

Authors:  Glenn N Levine; Eric R Bates; James C Blankenship; Steven R Bailey; John A Bittl; Bojan Cercek; Charles E Chambers; Stephen G Ellis; Robert A Guyton; Steven M Hollenberg; Umesh N Khot; Richard A Lange; Laura Mauri; Roxana Mehran; Issam D Moussa; Debabrata Mukherjee; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Henry H Ting
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Guidelines on myocardial revascularization.

Authors:  William Wijns; Philippe Kolh; Nicolas Danchin; Carlo Di Mario; Volkmar Falk; Thierry Folliguet; Scot Garg; Kurt Huber; Stefan James; Juhani Knuuti; Jose Lopez-Sendon; Jean Marco; Lorenzo Menicanti; Miodrag Ostojic; Massimo F Piepoli; Charles Pirlet; Jose L Pomar; Nicolaus Reifart; Flavio L Ribichini; Martin J Schalij; Paul Sergeant; Patrick W Serruys; Sigmund Silber; Miguel Sousa Uva; David Taggart
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2010-08-29       Impact factor: 29.983

5.  2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: the Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology.

Authors:  Gilles Montalescot; Udo Sechtem; Stephan Achenbach; Felicita Andreotti; Chris Arden; Andrzej Budaj; Raffaele Bugiardini; Filippo Crea; Thomas Cuisset; Carlo Di Mario; J Rafael Ferreira; Bernard J Gersh; Anselm K Gitt; Jean-Sebastien Hulot; Nikolaus Marx; Lionel H Opie; Matthias Pfisterer; Eva Prescott; Frank Ruschitzka; Manel Sabaté; Roxy Senior; David Paul Taggart; Ernst E van der Wall; Christiaan J M Vrints; Jose Luis Zamorano; Stephan Achenbach; Helmut Baumgartner; Jeroen J Bax; Héctor Bueno; Veronica Dean; Christi Deaton; Cetin Erol; Robert Fagard; Roberto Ferrari; David Hasdai; Arno W Hoes; Paulus Kirchhof; Juhani Knuuti; Philippe Kolh; Patrizio Lancellotti; Ales Linhart; Petros Nihoyannopoulos; Massimo F Piepoli; Piotr Ponikowski; Per Anton Sirnes; Juan Luis Tamargo; Michal Tendera; Adam Torbicki; William Wijns; Stephan Windecker; Juhani Knuuti; Marco Valgimigli; Héctor Bueno; Marc J Claeys; Norbert Donner-Banzhoff; Cetin Erol; Herbert Frank; Christian Funck-Brentano; Oliver Gaemperli; José R Gonzalez-Juanatey; Michalis Hamilos; David Hasdai; Steen Husted; Stefan K James; Kari Kervinen; Philippe Kolh; Steen Dalby Kristensen; Patrizio Lancellotti; Aldo Pietro Maggioni; Massimo F Piepoli; Axel R Pries; Francesco Romeo; Lars Rydén; Maarten L Simoons; Per Anton Sirnes; Ph Gabriel Steg; Adam Timmis; William Wijns; Stephan Windecker; Aylin Yildirir; Jose Luis Zamorano
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 29.983

6.  Differences between automatically detected and steady-state fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  Tobias Härle; Sven Meyer; Felix Vahldiek; Albrecht Elsässer
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 5.460

7.  Intracoronary Adenosine: Dose-Response Relationship With Hyperemia.

Authors:  Julien Adjedj; Gabor G Toth; Nils P Johnson; Mariano Pellicano; Angela Ferrara; Vincent Floré; Giuseppe Di Gioia; Emanuele Barbato; Olivier Muller; Bernard De Bruyne
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 11.195

8.  Maximal hyperemia in the assessment of fractional flow reserve: intracoronary adenosine versus intracoronary sodium nitroprusside versus intravenous adenosine: the NASCI (Nitroprussiato versus Adenosina nelle Stenosi Coronariche Intermedie) study.

Authors:  Antonio Maria Leone; Italo Porto; Alberto Ranieri De Caterina; Eloisa Basile; Andrea Aurelio; Andrea Gardi; Dolores Russo; Domenico Laezza; Giampaolo Niccoli; Francesco Burzotta; Carlo Trani; Mario Attilio Mazzari; Rocco Mongiardo; Antonio Giuseppe Rebuzzi; Filippo Crea
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 11.195

9.  Role of incremental doses of intracoronary adenosine for fractional flow reserve assessment.

Authors:  Blaithnead Murtagh; Stuart Higano; Ryan Lennon; Verghese Mathew; David R Holmes; Amir Lerman
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.749

10.  Impact of type 2 diabetes mellitus and glucose control on fractional flow reserve measurements in intermediate grade coronary lesions.

Authors:  Sebastian Reith; Simone Battermann; Martin Hellmich; Nikolaus Marx; Mathias Burgmaier
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 5.460

View more
  3 in total

1.  The assessment of ischaemic burden: validation of a functional jeopardy score against cardiovascular magnetic resonance perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Shazia T Hussain; Geraint Morton; Kalpa De Silva; Roy Jogiya; Andreas Schuster; Matthias Paul; Divaka Perera; Eike Nagel
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 5.460

2.  A comparison of standard and high dose adenosine protocols in routine vasodilator stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance: dosage affects hyperaemic myocardial blood flow in patients with severe left ventricular systolic impairment.

Authors:  Louise A E Brown; Christopher E D Saunderson; Arka Das; Thomas Craven; Eylem Levelt; Kristopher D Knott; Erica Dall'Armellina; Hui Xue; James C Moon; John P Greenwood; Peter Kellman; Peter P Swoboda; Sven Plein
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 5.364

3.  Comparison of Resting Full-Cycle Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve in a German Real-World Cohort.

Authors:  Hendrik Wienemann; Annika Meyer; Victor Mauri; Till Baar; Matti Adam; Stephan Baldus; Marcel Halbach
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-12-24
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.