Literature DB >> 12375254

Load transfer and fixation mode of press-fit acetabular sockets.

K-H Widmer1, B Zurfluh, E W Morscher.   

Abstract

Adequate initial fixation is a prerequisite for osseointegration and secondary stability of noncemented cups. Physiologic force transmission between the cup and acetabulum guarantees the best long-term fixation. To study load transfer within the natural hip joint and in the bone-implant interface of 2 different hemispherical noncemented press-fit cups, 10 hips were investigated in an experimental setup simulating single-leg stance. Load distribution and contact area were measured using prescale pressure-sensitive films and digital image analysis. Three dominant locations near the periphery of the acetabulum could be identified. Main load transfer occurs in the cranial region of the acetabulum, where it is buttressed by the iliac bone; the second location is at the posterior-inferior region at the ischial facet, and the third location is at the anterior region, where support is provided by the pubic bone. Peripheral rim contact was present in both cups but not completely circumferential. It showed marked loading at the same 3 locations similar to the natural hip joint. The ilioischial diagonal axis produced the highest press-fit. Peak local forces were found at the ischial and iliac facets. Local forces can be grouped into an iliac, an ischial, and a pubic group contributing 55%, 25%, and 20% to the total hip joint force. Pole contact was not present in the natural hip and with the biradial press-fit cup with flattened pole area but was observed with the pure hemispherical cup. Hence, stable fixation of an acetabular cup is achieved best by a 3-point-like bony support at the iliac, ischial, and pubic bone. The acetabular fovea does not provide functional support of the femoral head or endoprosthetic socket. In revision surgery, remaining peripheral bone stock at the iliac, ischial, and pubic locations allows stable implantation of primary cups. Copyright 2002, Elsevier Science (USA)

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12375254     DOI: 10.1054/arth.2002.34526

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  17 in total

1.  Effect of the initial implant fitting on the predicted secondary stability of a cementless stem.

Authors:  M Viceconti; A Pancanti; M Dotti; F Traina; L Cristofolini
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Deformation of metal-backed acetabular components and the impact of liner thickness in a cadaveric model.

Authors:  David Markel; Judd Day; Ryan Siskey; Imants Liepins; Steven Kurtz; Kevin Ong
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Radiographic evaluation of the Duraloc cup after 4 years.

Authors:  B Stoeckl; E Brabec; S Wanner; M Krismer; R Biedermann
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2004-10-14       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  Containment versus impingement: finding a compromise for cup placement in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  K-H Widmer
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Effect of design on the initial stability of press-fit cups in the presence of acetabular rim defects: experimental evaluation of the effect of adding circumferential fins.

Authors:  Wolfgang O Huber; Philip C Noble
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  The development of a scanning strategy for the manufacture of porous biomaterials by selective laser melting.

Authors:  R Stamp; P Fox; W O'Neill; E Jones; C Sutcliffe
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 3.896

7.  All dual mobility cups are not the same.

Authors:  Thierry Aslanian
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Segmental acetabular rim defects, bone loss, oversizing, and press fit cup in total hip arthroplasty evaluated with a probabilistic finite element analysis.

Authors:  Farid Amirouche; Giovanni F Solitro; Amit Walia; Mark Gonzalez; Aimee Bobko
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Classification of acetabular changes in osteoarthritis: a histological and radiological analysis of 122 consecutive drill biopsies routinely taken during THA.

Authors:  Martin Clauss; Thomas Ilchmann; Peter Zimmermann; Matthias U Schafroth; Martin Lüem; Peter E Ochsner
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 1.246

10.  Cup press fit in uncemented THA depends on sex, acetabular shape, and surgical technique.

Authors:  Eduardo García-Rey; Eduardo García-Cimbrelo; Ana Cruz-Pardos
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.