Literature DB >> 24256278

Checkpoint regulation of replication forks: global or local?

Divya Ramalingam Iyer1, Nicholas Rhind.   

Abstract

Cell-cycle checkpoints are generally global in nature: one unattached kinetochore prevents the segregation of all chromosomes; stalled replication forks inhibit late origin firing throughout the genome. A potential exception to this rule is the regulation of replication fork progression by the S-phase DNA damage checkpoint. In this case, it is possible that the checkpoint is global, and it slows all replication forks in the genome. However, it is also possible that the checkpoint acts locally at sites of DNA damage, and only slows those forks that encounter DNA damage. Whether the checkpoint regulates forks globally or locally has important mechanistic implications for how replication forks deal with damaged DNA during S-phase.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24256278      PMCID: PMC5074381          DOI: 10.1042/BST20130197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans        ISSN: 0300-5127            Impact factor:   5.407


  65 in total

Review 1.  A unified view of the DNA-damage checkpoint.

Authors:  Justine Melo; David Toczyski
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 8.382

2.  DNA polymerase stabilization at stalled replication forks requires Mec1 and the RecQ helicase Sgs1.

Authors:  Jennifer A Cobb; Lotte Bjergbaek; Kenji Shimada; Christian Frei; Susan M Gasser
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  Visualization of altered replication dynamics after DNA damage in human cells.

Authors:  Catherine J Merrick; Dean Jackson; John F X Diffley
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2004-02-23       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Chk1 promotes replication fork progression by controlling replication initiation.

Authors:  Eva Petermann; Mick Woodcock; Thomas Helleday
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-08-30       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Ultraviolet radiation inhibits replicon initiation in S phase human cells.

Authors:  W K Kaufmann; J E Cleaver; R B Painter
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1980-06-27

6.  Regulation of DNA replication fork progression through damaged DNA by the Mec1/Rad53 checkpoint.

Authors:  J A Tercero; J F Diffley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-08-02       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Replisome instability, fork collapse, and gross chromosomal rearrangements arise synergistically from Mec1 kinase and RecQ helicase mutations.

Authors:  Jennifer A Cobb; Thomas Schleker; Vanesa Rojas; Lotte Bjergbaek; José Antonio Tercero; Susan M Gasser
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 11.361

8.  Rad53 regulates replication fork restart after DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Shawn J Szyjka; Jennifer G Aparicio; Christopher J Viggiani; Simon Knott; Weihong Xu; Simon Tavaré; Oscar M Aparicio
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 11.361

9.  The Schizosaccharomyces pombe S-phase checkpoint differentiates between different types of DNA damage.

Authors:  N Rhind; P Russell
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Regulation of DNA-replication origins during cell-cycle progression.

Authors:  K Shirahige; Y Hori; K Shiraishi; M Yamashita; K Takahashi; C Obuse; T Tsurimoto; H Yoshikawa
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-10-08       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Behavior of replication origins in Eukaryota - spatio-temporal dynamics of licensing and firing.

Authors:  Marcelina W Musiałek; Dorota Rybaczek
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 4.534

2.  Mrc1 and Rad9 cooperate to regulate initiation and elongation of DNA replication in response to DNA damage.

Authors:  Julien Bacal; María Moriel-Carretero; Benjamin Pardo; Antoine Barthe; Sushma Sharma; Andrei Chabes; Armelle Lengronne; Philippe Pasero
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 3.  The more the merrier: how homo-oligomerization alters the interactome and function of ribonucleotide reductase.

Authors:  Marcus J C Long; Alexandra Van Hall-Beauvais; Yimon Aye
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 4.  Role of Protein Phosphorylation in the Regulation of Cell Cycle and DNA-Related Processes in Bacteria.

Authors:  Transito Garcia-Garcia; Sandrine Poncet; Abderahmane Derouiche; Lei Shi; Ivan Mijakovic; Marie-Françoise Noirot-Gros
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  The CDK-PLK1 axis targets the DNA damage checkpoint sensor protein RAD9 to promote cell proliferation and tolerance to genotoxic stress.

Authors:  Takeshi Wakida; Masae Ikura; Kenji Kuriya; Shinji Ito; Yoshiharu Shiroiwa; Toshiyuki Habu; Takuo Kawamoto; Katsuzumi Okumura; Tsuyoshi Ikura; Kanji Furuya
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  Replication fork slowing and stalling are distinct, checkpoint-independent consequences of replicating damaged DNA.

Authors:  Divya Ramalingam Iyer; Nicholas Rhind
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 5.917

7.  Critical role of SMG7 in activation of the ATR-CHK1 axis in response to genotoxic stress.

Authors:  Kathleen Ho; Hongwei Luo; Wei Zhu; Yi Tang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-05       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Mitotic fidelity requires transgenerational action of a testis-restricted HP1.

Authors:  Mia T Levine; Helen M Vander Wende; Harmit S Malik
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 8.140

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.