Literature DB >> 30972629

Imaginative Value Sensitive Design: Using Moral Imagination Theory to Inform Responsible Technology Design.

Steven Umbrello1.   

Abstract

Safe-by-design (SBD) frameworks for the development of emerging technologies have become an ever more popular means by which scholars argue that transformative emerging technologies can safely incorporate human values. One such popular SBD methodology is called value sensitive design (VSD). A central tenet of this design methodology is to investigate stakeholder values and design those values into technologies during early stage research and development. To accomplish this, the VSD framework mandates that designers consult the philosophical and ethical literature to best determine how to weigh moral trade-offs. However, the VSD framework also concedes the universalism of moral values, particularly the values of freedom, autonomy, equality trust and privacy justice. This paper argues that the VSD methodology, particularly applied to nano-bio-info-cogno technologies, has an insufficient grounding for the determination of moral values. As such, an exploration of the value-investigations of VSD are deconstructed to illustrate both its strengths and weaknesses. This paper also provides possible modalities for the strengthening of the VSD methodology, particularly through the application of moral imagination and how moral imagination exceeds the boundaries of moral intuitions in the development of novel technologies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Applied ethics; Design psychology; Moral imagination; Value sensitive design

Year:  2019        PMID: 30972629     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-019-00104-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  7 in total

1.  Ethicist as designer: a pragmatic approach to ethics in the lab.

Authors:  Aimee van Wynsberghe; Scott Robbins
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 2.  Psychobiological responses to social threat: evolution of a psychological model in psychoneuroimmunology.

Authors:  Margaret E Kemeny
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 7.217

3.  Autonomous Cars: In Favor of a Mandatory Ethics Setting.

Authors:  Jan Gogoll; Julian F Müller
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  The sociobiology of genes: the gene's eye view as a unifying behavioural-ecological framework for biological evolution.

Authors:  Alexis De Tiège; Yves Van de Peer; Johan Braeckman; Koen B Tanghe
Journal:  Hist Philos Life Sci       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 1.205

5.  Ethics and Nanopharmacy: Value Sensitive Design of New Drugs.

Authors:  Job Timmermans; Yinghuan Zhao; Jeroen van den Hoven
Journal:  Nanoethics       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 0.917

6.  Engineering and the problem of moral overload.

Authors:  Jeroen Van den Hoven; Gert-Jan Lokhorst; Ibo Van de Poel
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 3.525

7.  Cognitive biases can affect moral intuitions about cognitive enhancement.

Authors:  Lucius Caviola; Adriano Mannino; Julian Savulescu; Nadira Faulmüller
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-15
  7 in total
  4 in total

1.  Beyond bias and discrimination: redefining the AI ethics principle of fairness in healthcare machine-learning algorithms.

Authors:  Benedetta Giovanola; Simona Tiribelli
Journal:  AI Soc       Date:  2022-05-21

2.  Refining Value Sensitive Design: A (Capability-Based) Procedural Ethics Approach to Technological Design for Well-Being.

Authors:  Alessandra Cenci; Dylan Cawthorne
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Dual-Use and Trustworthy? A Mixed Methods Analysis of AI Diffusion Between Civilian and Defense R&D.

Authors:  Stefka Schmid; Thea Riebe; Christian Reuter
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 3.777

4.  AWOSE - A Process Model for Incorporating Ethical Analyses in Agile Systems Engineering.

Authors:  Benjamin Strenge; Thomas Schack
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 3.525

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.