Literature DB >> 24249307

Preview benefit in speaking occurs regardless of preview timing.

Elizabeth R Schotter1, Annie Jia, Victor S Ferreira, Keith Rayner.   

Abstract

Speakers access information from objects they will name but have not looked at yet, indexed by preview benefit--faster processing of the target when a preview object previously occupying its location was related rather than unrelated to the target. This suggests that speakers distribute attention over multiple objects, but it does not reveal the time course of the processing of a current and a to-be-named object. Is the preview benefit a consequence of attention shifting to the next-to-be-named object shortly before the eyes move to that location, or does the benefit reflect a more unconstrained deployment of attention to upcoming objects? Using the multiple-object naming paradigm with a gaze-contingent display change manipulation, we addressed this issue by manipulating the latency of the onset of the preview (SOA) and whether the preview represented the same concept as (but a different visual token of) the target or an unrelated concept. The results revealed that the preview benefit was robust, regardless of the latency of the preview onset or the latency of the saccade to the target (the lag between preview offset and fixation on the target). Together, these data suggest that preview benefit is not restricted to the time during an attention shift preceding an eye movement, and that speakers are able to take advantage of information from nonfoveal objects whenever such objects are visually available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24249307      PMCID: PMC4026352          DOI: 10.3758/s13423-013-0553-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  20 in total

1.  What the eyes say about speaking.

Authors:  Z M Griffin; K Bock
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2000-07

2.  Timed picture naming in seven languages.

Authors:  Elizabeth Bates; Simona D'Amico; Thomas Jacobsen; Anna Székely; Elena Andonova; Antonella Devescovi; Dan Herron; Ching Ching Lu; Thomas Pechmann; Csaba Pléh; Nicole Wicha; Kara Federmeier; Irini Gerdjikova; Gabriel Gutierrez; Daisy Hung; Jeanne Hsu; Gowri Iyer; Katherine Kohnert; Teodora Mehotcheva; Araceli Orozco-Figueroa; Angela Tzeng; Ovid Tzeng
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-06

Review 3.  Parafoveal processing in reading.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Schotter; Bernhard Angele; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Encoding multiple words simultaneously in reading is implausible.

Authors:  Erik D Reichle; Simon P Liversedge; Alexander Pollatsek; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2009-02-14       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Parallel processing of objects in a naming task.

Authors:  Antje S Meyer; Marc Ouellet; Christine Häcker
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Covert visual attention and extrafoveal information use during object identification.

Authors:  J M Henderson; A Pollatsek; K Rayner
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-03

7.  The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  J E Hoffman; B Subramaniam
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-08

8.  Parallel object activation and attentional gating of information: evidence from eye movements in the multiple object naming paradigm.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Schotter; Victor S Ferreira; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  On the processing of canonical word order during eye fixations in reading: Do readers process transposed word previews?

Authors:  Keith Rayner; Bernhard Angele; Elizabeth R Schotter; Klinton Bicknell
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2013-03-01

10.  Processing of extrafoveal objects during multiple-object naming.

Authors:  Jane L Morgan; Antje S Meyer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.051

View more
  1 in total

1.  Eye movements during text reading align with the rate of speech production.

Authors:  Benjamin Gagl; Klara Gregorova; Julius Golch; Stefan Hawelka; Jona Sassenhagen; Alessandro Tavano; David Poeppel; Christian J Fiebach
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2021-12-06
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.