Literature DB >> 2710617

Covert visual attention and extrafoveal information use during object identification.

J M Henderson, A Pollatsek, K Rayner.   

Abstract

Three experiments are reported that examined the relationship between covert visual attention and a viewer's ability to use extrafoveal visual information during object identification. Subjects looked at arrays of four objects while their eye movements were recorded. Their task was to identify the objects in the array for an immediate probe memory test. During viewing, the number and location of objects visible during given fixations were manipulated. In Experiments 1 and 2, we found that multiple extrafoveal previews of an object did not afford any more benefit than a single extrafoveal preview, as assessed by means of time of fixation on the objects. In Experiment 3, we found evidence for a model in which extrafoveal information acquired during a fixation derives primarily from the location toward which the eyes will move next. The results are discussed in terms of their implications for the relationship between covert visual attention and extrafoveal information use, and a sequential attention model is proposed.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2710617     DOI: 10.3758/bf03210697

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  35 in total

1.  Does attention affect visual feature integration?

Authors:  W Prinzmetal; D E Presti; M I Posner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Is visual information integrated across successive fixations in reading?

Authors:  G W McConkie; D Zola
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1979-03

3.  Moving attention through visual space.

Authors:  G L Shulman; R W Remington; J P McLean
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Masking of foveal and parafoveal vision during eye fixations in reading.

Authors:  K Rayner; A W Inhoff; R E Morrison; M L Slowiaczek; J H Bertera
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; M Vanderwart
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1980-03

6.  Behavioral enhancement of visual responses in monkey cerebral cortex. I. Modulation in posterior parietal cortex related to selective visual attention.

Authors:  M C Bushnell; M E Goldberg; D L Robinson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Asymmetries in the perceptual span for Israeli readers.

Authors:  A Pollatsek; S Bolozky; A D Well; K Rayner
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 2.381

8.  Cognitive determinants of fixation location during picture viewing.

Authors:  G R Loftus; N H Mackworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Determinants of eye-fixation duration.

Authors:  T A Salthouse; C L Ellis
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1980-06

10.  Reading without a fovea.

Authors:  K Rayner; J H Bertera
Journal:  Science       Date:  1979-10-26       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  32 in total

1.  Types and tokens in transsaccadic object identification: effects of spatial position and left-right orientation.

Authors:  J M Henderson; A B Siefert
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-12

2.  To see and remember: visually specific information is retained in memory from previously attended objects in natural scenes.

Authors:  A Hollingworth; C C Williams; J M Henderson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-12

3.  Attentional selection during preparation of eye movements.

Authors:  Karine Doré-Mazars; Pierre Pouget; Cécile Beauvillain
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2004-05-11

4.  Can telling older adults where to look reduce falls? Evidence for a causal link between inappropriate visual sampling and suboptimal stepping performance.

Authors:  William R Young; Mark A Hollands
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-29       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Losing sight of the bigger picture: peripheral field loss compresses representations of space.

Authors:  Francesca C Fortenbaugh; John C Hicks; Lei Hao; Kathleen A Turano
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-08-10       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 6.  A theory of eye movements during target acquisition.

Authors:  Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Preview benefit in speaking occurs regardless of preview timing.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Schotter; Annie Jia; Victor S Ferreira; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-06

8.  Perceptual effects of scene context on object identification.

Authors:  P De Graef; D Christiaens; G d'Ydewalle
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1990

9.  Eye-Movement Control in RAN and Reading.

Authors:  Victor Kuperman; Julie A Van Dyke; Regina Henry
Journal:  Sci Stud Read       Date:  2016-01-08

10.  Investigating temporal properties of covert shifts of visual attention using the attentional walk task.

Authors:  Elisabeth Hein; Cathleen M Moore
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.