Literature DB >> 15910129

Processing of extrafoveal objects during multiple-object naming.

Jane L Morgan1, Antje S Meyer.   

Abstract

In 3 experiments, the authors investigated the extent to which objects that are about to be named are processed prior to fixation. Participants named pairs or triplets of objects. One of the objects, initially seen extrafoveally (the interloper), was replaced by a different object (the target) during the saccade toward it. The interloper-target pairs were identical or unrelated objects or visually and conceptually unrelated objects with homophonous names (e.g., animal- baseball bat). The mean latencies and gaze durations for the targets were shorter in the identity and homophone conditions than in the unrelated condition. This was true when participants viewed a fixation mark until the interloper appeared and when they fixated on another object and prepared to name it while viewing the interloper. These results imply that objects that are about to be named may undergo far-reaching processing, including access to their names, prior to fixation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15910129     DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.3.428

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  15 in total

1.  Planning in sentence production: evidence for the phrase as a default planning scope.

Authors:  Randi C Martin; Jason E Crowther; Meredith Knight; Franklin P Tamborello; Chin-Lung Yang
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-05-23

Review 2.  Observing the what and when of language production for different age groups by monitoring speakers' eye movements.

Authors:  Zenzi M Griffin; Daniel H Spieler
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2005-11-10       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  Early activation of object names in visual search.

Authors:  Antje S Meyer; Eva Belke; Anna L Telling; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-08

4.  Activation of distractor names in the picture-picture interference paradigm.

Authors:  Antje S Meyer; Markus F Damian
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-04

5.  Dyslexic and nondyslexic reading fluency: rapid automatized naming and the importance of continuous lists.

Authors:  Manon W Jones; Holly P Branigan; M Louise Kelly
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-06

6.  Preview benefit in speaking occurs regardless of preview timing.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Schotter; Annie Jia; Victor S Ferreira; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-06

7.  Extrafoveal processing of objects in a naming task: evidence from word probe experiments.

Authors:  Jane L Morgan; Gius van Elswijk; Antje S Meyer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-06

8.  Parallel object activation and attentional gating of information: evidence from eye movements in the multiple object naming paradigm.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Schotter; Victor S Ferreira; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Getting the gist of events: recognition of two-participant actions from brief displays.

Authors:  Alon Hafri; Anna Papafragou; John C Trueswell
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2012-09-17

10.  On the give and take between event apprehension and utterance formulation.

Authors:  Lila R Gleitman; David January; Rebecca Nappa; John C Trueswell
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.