Literature DB >> 24249037

Comparison of the accuracy of experimental and predicted pKa values of basic and acidic compounds.

Luca Settimo1, Krista Bellman, Ronald M A Knegtel.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Assessment of the accuracy of experimental and theoretical methods of pKa determination for acids and bases as separate classes.
METHODS: Four literature pKa datasets were checked for errors and pKa values assigned unambiguously to a single acidic and/or basic ionisation centre. A new chemically diverse and drug-like dataset was compiled from high-throughput UV-vis spectrophotometry pKa data. Measured pKa values were compared with data obtained by alternative methods and predictions by the Epik, Chemaxon and ACD pKa DB software packages.
RESULTS: The pKa values of bases were considerably less accurately predicted than those of acids, in particular for structurally complex bases. Several new chemical motifs were identified for which pKa values were particularly poorly predicted. Comparison of pKa values obtained by UV-vis spectrophotometry and different literature sources revealed that low aqueous solubility and chromophore strength can affect the accuracy of experimental pKa determination for certain bases but not acids.
CONCLUSIONS: The pKa prediction tools Epik, Chemaxon and ACD pKa DB provide significantly less accurate predictions for bases compared to acids. Certain chemical features are underrepresented in currently available pKa data sets and as a result poorly predicted. Acids and bases need to be considered as separate classes during pKa predictor development and validation.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24249037     DOI: 10.1007/s11095-013-1232-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharm Res        ISSN: 0724-8741            Impact factor:   4.200


  27 in total

1.  A potentially simpler approach to measure aqueous pKa of insoluble basic drugs containing amino groups.

Authors:  Rebeca Ruiz; Clara Ràfols; Martí Rosés; Elisabeth Bosch
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.534

2.  Use of physicochemical calculation of pKa and CLogP to predict phospholipidosis-inducing potential: a case study with structurally related piperazines.

Authors:  Jan-Peter H T M Ploemen; Jan Kelder; Theo Hafmans; Han van de Sandt; Johan A van Burgsteden; Paul J M Saleminki; Eric van Esch
Journal:  Exp Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2004-03

Review 3.  Medicinal chemistry of hERG optimizations: Highlights and hang-ups.

Authors:  Craig Jamieson; Elizabeth M Moir; Zoran Rankovic; Grant Wishart
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2006-08-24       Impact factor: 7.446

4.  Multiwavelength spectrophotometric determination of acid dissociation constants of ionizable drugs.

Authors:  R I Allen; K J Box; J E Comer; C Peake; K Y Tam
Journal:  J Pharm Biomed Anal       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.935

5.  The use of substituent constants in the correlation of demethylation rates.

Authors:  C Hansch; A R Steward; J Iwasa
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  1965-11       Impact factor: 7.446

6.  Comparison of nine programs predicting pK(a) values of pharmaceutical substances.

Authors:  Chenzhong Liao; Marc C Nicklaus
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.956

7.  Prediction of human volume of distribution values for neutral and basic drugs. 2. Extended data set and leave-class-out statistics.

Authors:  Franco Lombardo; R Scott Obach; Marina Y Shalaeva; Feng Gao
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-02-26       Impact factor: 7.446

8.  Physico-chemical characterization of a novel group of dopamine D(3)/D(2) receptor ligands, potential atypical antipsychotic agents.

Authors:  Katalin Deák; Krisztina Takács-Novák; Margit Kapás; Mónika Vastag; Károly Tihanyi; Béla Noszál
Journal:  J Pharm Biomed Anal       Date:  2008-07-06       Impact factor: 3.935

Review 9.  Predicting and tuning physicochemical properties in lead optimization: amine basicities.

Authors:  Martin Morgenthaler; Eliane Schweizer; Anja Hoffmann-Röder; Fausta Benini; Rainer E Martin; Georg Jaeschke; Björn Wagner; Holger Fischer; Stefanie Bendels; Daniel Zimmerli; Josef Schneider; François Diederich; Manfred Kansy; Klaus Müller
Journal:  ChemMedChem       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.466

10.  The pK(a) Distribution of Drugs: Application to Drug Discovery.

Authors:  David T Manallack
Journal:  Perspect Medicin Chem       Date:  2007-09-17
View more
  16 in total

1.  Rapid experimental measurements of physicochemical properties to inform models and testing.

Authors:  Chantel I Nicolas; Kamel Mansouri; Katherine A Phillips; Christopher M Grulke; Ann M Richard; Antony J Williams; James Rabinowitz; Kristin K Isaacs; Alice Yau; John F Wambaugh
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  SAMPL6 challenge results from [Formula: see text] predictions based on a general Gaussian process model.

Authors:  Caitlin C Bannan; David L Mobley; A Geoffrey Skillman
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  How Does the Methodology of 3D Structure Preparation Influence the Quality of pKa Prediction?

Authors:  Stanislav Geidl; Radka Svobodová Vařeková; Veronika Bendová; Lukáš Petrusek; Crina-Maria Ionescu; Zdeněk Jurka; Ruben Abagyan; Jaroslav Koča
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 4.956

4.  Discovery of potential mTOR inhibitors from Cichorium intybus to find new candidate drugs targeting the pathological protein related to the breast cancer: an integrated computational approach.

Authors:  Hezha O Rasul; Bakhtyar K Aziz; Dlzar D Ghafour; Arif Kivrak
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 2.943

5.  Modelling Antifouling compounds of Macroalgal Holobionts in Current and Future pH Conditions.

Authors:  Christina C Roggatz; Mahasweta Saha; Jörg D Hardege
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Automated high throughput pKa and distribution coefficient measurements of pharmaceutical compounds for the SAMPL8 blind prediction challenge.

Authors:  Matthew N Bahr; Aakankschit Nandkeolyar; John K Kenna; Neysa Nevins; Luigi Da Vià; Mehtap Işık; John D Chodera; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 4.179

7.  Stacking Gaussian processes to improve [Formula: see text] predictions in the SAMPL7 challenge.

Authors:  Robert M Raddi; Vincent A Voelz
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2021-08-07       Impact factor: 4.179

8.  Prediction of pKa Values for Neutral and Basic Drugs based on Hybrid Artificial Intelligence Methods.

Authors:  Mengshan Li; Huaijing Zhang; Bingsheng Chen; Yan Wu; Lixin Guan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Overview of the SAMPL6 pKa challenge: evaluating small molecule microscopic and macroscopic pKa predictions.

Authors:  Mehtap Işık; Ariën S Rustenburg; Andrea Rizzi; M R Gunner; David L Mobley; John D Chodera
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 3.686

10.  Prediction of pKa values using the PM6 semiempirical method.

Authors:  Jimmy C Kromann; Frej Larsen; Hadeel Moustafa; Jan H Jensen
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.