Literature DB >> 34714468

Automated high throughput pKa and distribution coefficient measurements of pharmaceutical compounds for the SAMPL8 blind prediction challenge.

Matthew N Bahr1, Aakankschit Nandkeolyar2,3,4, John K Kenna2, Neysa Nevins2, Luigi Da Vià5, Mehtap Işık6, John D Chodera6, David L Mobley4.   

Abstract

The goal of the Statistical Assessment of the Modeling of Proteins and Ligands (SAMPL) challenge is to improve the accuracy of current computational models to estimate free energy of binding, deprotonation, distribution and other associated physical properties that are useful for the design of new pharmaceutical products. New experimental datasets of physicochemical properties provide opportunities for prospective evaluation of computational prediction methods. Here, aqueous pKa and a range of bi-phasic logD values for a variety of pharmaceutical compounds were determined through a streamlined automated process to be utilized in the SAMPL8 physical property challenge. The goal of this paper is to provide an in-depth review of the experimental methods utilized to create a comprehensive data set for the blind prediction challenge. The significance of this work involves the use of high throughput experimentation equipment and instrumentation to produce acid dissociation constants for twenty-three drug molecules, as well as distribution coefficients for eleven of those molecules.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acid dissociation constants; Blind prediction challenge; Distribution coefficients; High throughput experimentation; SAMPL; pH-solubility profiles

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34714468      PMCID: PMC9313606          DOI: 10.1007/s10822-021-00427-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   4.179


  29 in total

1.  The SAMPL3 blind prediction challenge: transfer energy overview.

Authors:  Matthew T Geballe; J Peter Guthrie
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 2.  High throughput solubility measurement in drug discovery and development.

Authors:  Jochem Alsenz; Manfred Kansy
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2007-05-29       Impact factor: 15.470

3.  Predicting small-molecule solvation free energies: an informal blind test for computational chemistry.

Authors:  Anthony Nicholls; David L Mobley; J Peter Guthrie; John D Chodera; Christopher I Bayly; Matthew D Cooper; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2008-01-24       Impact factor: 7.446

4.  Quantification of the Impact of Partition Coefficient Prediction Methods on Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model Output Using a Standardized Tissue Composition.

Authors:  Kiersten Utsey; Madeleine S Gastonguay; Sean Russell; Reed Freling; Matthew M Riggs; Ahmed Elmokadem
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 3.922

Review 5.  High-Throughput Automation in Chemical Process Development.

Authors:  Joshua A Selekman; Jun Qiu; Kristy Tran; Jason Stevens; Victor Rosso; Eric Simmons; Yi Xiao; Jacob Janey
Journal:  Annu Rev Chem Biomol Eng       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 11.059

6.  SAMPL4, a blind challenge for computational solvation free energies: the compounds considered.

Authors:  J Peter Guthrie
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-04-06       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 7.  Support Tools in Formulation Development for Poorly Soluble Drugs.

Authors:  Gudrun A Fridgeirsdottir; Robert Harris; Peter M Fischer; Clive J Roberts
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 3.534

8.  FreeSolv: a database of experimental and calculated hydration free energies, with input files.

Authors:  David L Mobley; J Peter Guthrie
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  Blind prediction of cyclohexane-water distribution coefficients from the SAMPL5 challenge.

Authors:  Caitlin C Bannan; Kalistyn H Burley; Michael Chiu; Michael R Shirts; Michael K Gilson; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 3.686

10.  Development of Methods for the Determination of pKa Values.

Authors:  Jetse Reijenga; Arno van Hoof; Antonie van Loon; Bram Teunissen
Journal:  Anal Chem Insights       Date:  2013-08-08
View more
  1 in total

1.  Automated high throughput pKa and distribution coefficient measurements of pharmaceutical compounds for the SAMPL8 blind prediction challenge.

Authors:  Matthew N Bahr; Aakankschit Nandkeolyar; John K Kenna; Neysa Nevins; Luigi Da Vià; Mehtap Işık; John D Chodera; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 4.179

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.