Literature DB >> 33394238

Overview of the SAMPL6 pKa challenge: evaluating small molecule microscopic and macroscopic pKa predictions.

Mehtap Işık1,2, Ariën S Rustenburg3,4, Andrea Rizzi3,5, M R Gunner6, David L Mobley7, John D Chodera3.   

Abstract

The prediction of acid dissociation constants (pKa) is a prerequisite for predicting many other properties of a small molecule, such as its protein-ligand binding affinity, distribution coefficient (log D), membrane permeability, and solubility. The prediction of each of these properties requires knowledge of the relevant protonation states and solution free energy penalties of each state. The SAMPL6 pKa Challenge was the first time that a separate challenge was conducted for evaluating pKa predictions as part of the Statistical Assessment of Modeling of Proteins and Ligands (SAMPL) exercises. This challenge was motivated by significant inaccuracies observed in prior physical property prediction challenges, such as the SAMPL5 log D Challenge, caused by protonation state and pKa prediction issues. The goal of the pKa challenge was to assess the performance of contemporary pKa prediction methods for drug-like molecules. The challenge set was composed of 24 small molecules that resembled fragments of kinase inhibitors, a number of which were multiprotic. Eleven research groups contributed blind predictions for a total of 37 pKa distinct prediction methods. In addition to blinded submissions, four widely used pKa prediction methods were included in the analysis as reference methods. Collecting both microscopic and macroscopic pKa predictions allowed in-depth evaluation of pKa prediction performance. This article highlights deficiencies of typical pKa prediction evaluation approaches when the distinction between microscopic and macroscopic pKas is ignored; in particular, we suggest more stringent evaluation criteria for microscopic and macroscopic pKa predictions guided by the available experimental data. Top-performing submissions for macroscopic pKa predictions achieved RMSE of 0.7-1.0 pKa units and included both quantum chemical and empirical approaches, where the total number of extra or missing macroscopic pKas predicted by these submissions were fewer than 8 for 24 molecules. A large number of submissions had RMSE spanning 1-3 pKa units. Molecules with sulfur-containing heterocycles or iodo and bromo groups were less accurately predicted on average considering all methods evaluated. For a subset of molecules, we utilized experimentally-determined microstates based on NMR to evaluate the dominant tautomer predictions for each macroscopic state. Prediction of dominant tautomers was a major source of error for microscopic pKa predictions, especially errors in charged tautomers. The degree of inaccuracy in pKa predictions observed in this challenge is detrimental to the protein-ligand binding affinity predictions due to errors in dominant protonation state predictions and the calculation of free energy corrections for multiple protonation states. Underestimation of ligand pKa by 1 unit can lead to errors in binding free energy errors up to 1.2 kcal/mol. The SAMPL6 pKa Challenge demonstrated the need for improving pKa prediction methods for drug-like molecules, especially for challenging moieties and multiprotic molecules.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acid dissociation constant; Blind prediction challenge; Macroscopic pK a; Macroscopic protonation state; Microscopic pK a; Microscopic protonation state; SAMPL; Small molecule; pK a

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33394238      PMCID: PMC7904668          DOI: 10.1007/s10822-020-00362-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  35 in total

1.  First Principles Calculations of Aqueous pKa Values for Organic and Inorganic Acids Using COSMO-RS Reveal an Inconsistency in the Slope of the pKa Scale.

Authors:  Andreas Klamt; Frank Eckert; Michael Diedenhofen; Michael E Beck
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2003-11-06       Impact factor: 2.781

2.  In silico pKa prediction and ADME profiling.

Authors:  Gabriele Cruciani; Francesca Milletti; Loriano Storchi; Gianluca Sforna; Laura Goracci
Journal:  Chem Biodivers       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.408

3.  Rigorous Free Energy Perturbation Approach to Estimating Relative Binding Affinities between Ligands with Multiple Protonation and Tautomeric States.

Authors:  César de Oliveira; Haoyu S Yu; Wei Chen; Robert Abel; Lingle Wang
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2018-12-26       Impact factor: 6.006

4.  The SAMPL6 challenge on predicting aqueous pKa values from EC-RISM theory.

Authors:  Nicolas Tielker; Lukas Eberlein; Stefan Güssregen; Stefan M Kast
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 5.  Acidic and basic drugs in medicinal chemistry: a perspective.

Authors:  Paul S Charifson; W Patrick Walters
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 7.446

6.  Assessing the accuracy of octanol-water partition coefficient predictions in the SAMPL6 Part II log P Challenge.

Authors:  Mehtap Işık; Teresa Danielle Bergazin; Thomas Fox; Andrea Rizzi; John D Chodera; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  SAMPL6 challenge results from [Formula: see text] predictions based on a general Gaussian process model.

Authors:  Caitlin C Bannan; David L Mobley; A Geoffrey Skillman
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 3.686

8.  Absolute and relative pKa predictions via a DFT approach applied to the SAMPL6 blind challenge.

Authors:  Qiao Zeng; Michael R Jones; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  SAMPL6: calculation of macroscopic pKa values from ab initio quantum mechanical free energies.

Authors:  Edithe Selwa; Ian M Kenney; Oliver Beckstein; Bogdan I Iorga
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 3.686

10.  A chemogenomic analysis of ionization constants--implications for drug discovery.

Authors:  David T Manallack; Richard J Prankerd; Gemma C Nassta; Oleg Ursu; Tudor I Oprea; David K Chalmers
Journal:  ChemMedChem       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 3.466

View more
  5 in total

1.  Improving Small Molecule pK a Prediction Using Transfer Learning With Graph Neural Networks.

Authors:  Fritz Mayr; Marcus Wieder; Oliver Wieder; Thierry Langer
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 5.545

2.  SAMPL7 blind challenge: quantum-mechanical prediction of partition coefficients and acid dissociation constants for small drug-like molecules.

Authors:  Basak Koca Fındık; Zeynep Pinar Haslak; Evrim Arslan; Viktorya Aviyente
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  SAMPL7 protein-ligand challenge: A community-wide evaluation of computational methods against fragment screening and pose-prediction.

Authors:  Harold Grosjean; Mehtap Işık; Anthony Aimon; David Mobley; John Chodera; Frank von Delft; Philip C Biggin
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 4.179

4.  Molecular docking assisted exploration on solubilization of poorly soluble drug remdesivir in sulfobutyl ether-tycyclodextrin.

Authors:  Yumeng Zhang; Zhouming Zhao; Kai Wang; Kangjie Lyu; Cai Yao; Lin Li; Xia Shen; Tengfei Liu; Xiaodi Guo; Haiyan Li; Wenshou Wang; Tsai-Ta Lai
Journal:  AAPS Open       Date:  2022-04-25

5.  Evaluation of log P, pKa, and log D predictions from the SAMPL7 blind challenge.

Authors:  Teresa Danielle Bergazin; Nicolas Tielker; Yingying Zhang; Junjun Mao; M R Gunner; Karol Francisco; Carlo Ballatore; Stefan M Kast; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 3.686

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.