Literature DB >> 19961204

Comparison of nine programs predicting pK(a) values of pharmaceutical substances.

Chenzhong Liao1, Marc C Nicklaus.   

Abstract

Knowledge of the possible ionization states of a pharmaceutical substance, embodied in the pK(a) values (logarithm of the acid dissociation constant), is vital for understanding many properties essential to drug development. We compare nine commercially available or free programs for predicting ionization constants. Eight of these programs are based on empirical methods: ACD/pK(a) DB 12.0, ADME Boxes 4.9, ADMET Predictor 3.0, Epik 1.6, Marvin 5.1.4, Pallas pKalc Net 2.0, Pipeline Pilot 5.0, and SPARC 4.2; one program is based on a quantum chemical method: Jaguar 7.5. We compared their performances by applying them to 197 pharmaceutical substances with 261 carefully determined and highly reliable experimental pK(a) values from a literature source. The programs ADME Boxes 4.9, ACD/pK(a) DB 12.0, and SPARC 4.2 ranked as the top three with mean absolute deviations of 0.389, 0.478, and 0.651 and r(2) values of 0.944, 0.908, and 0.894, respectively. ACD/pK(a) DB 12.0 predicted all sites, whereas ADME Boxes 4.9 and SPARC 4.2 failed to predict 5 and 18 sites, respectively. The performance of the quantum chemical-based program Jaguar 7.5 was not as expected, with a mean absolute deviation of 1.283 and an r(2) value of 0.579, indicating the potential for further development of this type of approach to pK(a) prediction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19961204      PMCID: PMC7289148          DOI: 10.1021/ci900289x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  20 in total

1.  Appendix a.

Authors:  Richard J Prankerd
Journal:  Profiles Drug Subst Excip Relat Methodol       Date:  2007-11-21

2.  A modification of the Hammett equation for predicting ionisation constants of p-vinyl phenols.

Authors:  Julius Sipilä; Harri Nurmi; Ann Marie Kaukonen; Jouni Hirvonen; Jyrki Taskinen; Jari Yli-Kauhaluoma
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Sci       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.384

3.  Computational determination of aqueous pKa values of protonated benzimidazoles (Part 2).

Authors:  Trevor N Brown; Nelaine Mora-Diez
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 2.991

4.  New and original pKa prediction method using grid molecular interaction fields.

Authors:  Francesca Milletti; Loriano Storchi; Gianluca Sforna; Gabriele Cruciani
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 4.956

5.  Epik: a software program for pK( a ) prediction and protonation state generation for drug-like molecules.

Authors:  John C Shelley; Anuradha Cholleti; Leah L Frye; Jeremy R Greenwood; Mathew R Timlin; Makoto Uchimaya
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2007-09-27       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  The thermodynamic dissociation constants of four non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs by the least-squares nonlinear regression of multiwavelength spectrophotometric pH-titration data.

Authors:  Milan Meloun; Sylva Bordovská; Lubomír Galla
Journal:  J Pharm Biomed Anal       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 3.935

7.  First-principles calculation of pKa for cocaine, nicotine, neurotransmitters, and anilines in aqueous solution.

Authors:  Haiting Lu; Xi Chen; Chang-Guo Zhan
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2007-08-11       Impact factor: 2.991

8.  Computational determination of aqueous pKa values of protonated benzimidazoles (part 1).

Authors:  Trevor N Brown; Nelaine Mora-Diez
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 2.991

9.  Calculation of pKa values of nucleobases and the guanine oxidation products guanidinohydantoin and spiroiminodihydantoin using density functional theory and a polarizable continuum model.

Authors:  Vincenzo Verdolino; Roberto Cammi; Barbara H Munk; H Bernhard Schlegel
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2008-12-25       Impact factor: 2.991

10.  IEF-PCM calculations of absolute pKa for substituted phenols in dimethyl sulfoxide and acetonitrile solutions.

Authors:  Aleksander Trummal; Alar Rummel; Endel Lippmaa; Peeter Burk; Ilmar A Koppel
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2009-05-28       Impact factor: 2.781

View more
  21 in total

1.  Multi-task learning for pKa prediction.

Authors:  Grigorios Skolidis; Katja Hansen; Guido Sanguinetti; Matthias Rupp
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Towards the comprehensive, rapid, and accurate prediction of the favorable tautomeric states of drug-like molecules in aqueous solution.

Authors:  Jeremy R Greenwood; David Calkins; Arron P Sullivan; John C Shelley
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Comparison of the accuracy of experimental and predicted pKa values of basic and acidic compounds.

Authors:  Luca Settimo; Krista Bellman; Ronald M A Knegtel
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 4.200

4.  Correlations between the 1H NMR chemical shieldings and the pKa values of organic acids and amines.

Authors:  Juanfeng Lu; Tingting Lu; Xinyun Zhao; Xi Chen; Chang-Guo Zhan
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 1.810

Review 5.  Warfarin: history, tautomerism and activity.

Authors:  William R Porter
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Exploring Potential Binding Modes of Small Drug-like Molecules to the Polo-Box Domain of Human Polo-like Kinase 1.

Authors:  Chenzhong Liao; Jung-Eun Park; Jeong Kyu Bang; Marc C Nicklaus; Kyung S Lee
Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.345

7.  The IUPAC aqueous and non-aqueous experimental pKa data repositories of organic acids and bases.

Authors:  Anthony Michael Slater
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-06-22       Impact factor: 3.686

8.  The importance of protonation and tautomerization in relative binding affinity prediction: a comparison of AMBER TI and Schrödinger FEP.

Authors:  Yuan Hu; Brad Sherborne; Tai-Sung Lee; David A Case; Darrin M York; Zhuyan Guo
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  Tumor physiology and charge dynamics of anticancer drugs: implications for camptothecin-based drug development.

Authors:  D J Adams; L R Morgan
Journal:  Curr Med Chem       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  High-throughput in-silico prediction of ionization equilibria for pharmacokinetic modeling.

Authors:  Cory L Strope; Kamel Mansouri; Harvey J Clewell; James R Rabinowitz; Caroline Stevens; John F Wambaugh
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 7.963

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.