| Literature DB >> 24238301 |
Yin-Jun Li, Xin-Lou Li, Song Liang, Li-Qun Fang1, Wu-Chun Cao.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Human brucellosis incidence in China has been increasing dramatically since 1999. However, epidemiological features and potential factors underlying the re-emergence of the disease remain less understood.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24238301 PMCID: PMC3834885 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-13-547
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Infect Dis ISSN: 1471-2334 Impact factor: 3.090
Figure 1Temporal distribution of human brucellosis in the mainland China, 2004–2010.
Figure 2Human brucellosis incidence over gender and age group in mainland China.
Figure 3Distribution map of proportion of human cases over occupation (2010).
Figure 4Spatiotemporal distribution of human brucellosis incidence in mainland China, 2004–2010.
The association between brucellosis incidence and influencing factors by Poisson regression
| | | | | | |
| < 0.03 | 0.23 (0.03 - 0.43) | | | | |
| 0.03 - | 1.00 (0.63 - 1.36) | | | | |
| > 8 | 14.30 (9.76 - 18.84) | | | | |
| | 1.54 (1.48 - 1.60) | < 0.001 | 1.42 (1.28 - 1.57) | < 0.001 | |
| | | | | | |
| < 0.3 | 0.95 (0.63 - 1.27) | | | | |
| 0.3 - | 3.56 (2.38 - 4.74) | | | | |
| > 3 | 10.10 (5.87 - 14.33) | | | | |
| | 1.41 (1.22 - 1.62) | < 0.001 | 1.15 (1.01 - 1.32) | 0.033 | |
| | | | | | |
| < 30 | 7.79 (3.91 - 11.67) | | | | |
| 30 - | 4.28 (2.96 - 5.59) | | | | |
| > 150 | 1.95 (1.11 - 2.78) | | | | |
| | 0.64 (0.48 - 0.87) | 0.004 | 0.80 (0.66 - 0.96) | 0.016 | |
| | | | | | |
| < 3 | 1.23 (0.77 - 1.70) | | | | |
| 3 - | 4.82 (2.86 - 6.78) | | | | |
| > 30 | 8.49 (4.43 - 12.56) | | | | |
| | 1.44 (0.95 - 2.19) | 0.084 | 0.70 (0.44 - 1.11) | 0.126 | |
| | | | | | |
| < 0.4 | 1.59 (0.90 - 2.28) | 1 | - | 1 | - |
| 0.4 - | 4.17 (2.17 - 6.18) | 2.97 (1.44 - 6.16) | 0.003 | 3.31 (1.93 - 5.68) | < 0.001 |
| 0.8 - | 17.47 (10.25 - 24.68) | 10.12 (5.78 - 17.72) | < 0.001 | 5.77 (3.68 - 9.05) | < 0.001 |
| > 1.6 | 0.78 (0.07 - 1.49) | 0.70 (0.12 - 4.23) | 0.701 | 0.44 (0.12 - 1.69) | 0.234 |
| | | | | | |
| < 20 | 7.26 (3.29 - 11.23) | | | | |
| 20 - | 3.97 (2.97 - 4.96 ) | | | | |
| > 50 | 3.05 (1.85 - 4.25 ) | | | | |
| | 1.00 (0.99 - 1.00) | 0.758 | | | |
| | | | | | |
| < 5 | 7.75 (3.70 - 11.81) | | | | |
| 5 - | 5.46 (3.98 - 6.93) | | | | |
| > 40 | 1.25 (0.75 - 1.76 ) | | | | |
| | 1.00 (0.99 - 1.00) | 0.976 | | | |
| | | | | | |
| < 2 | 0.28 (0.20 - 0.37 ) | | | | |
| 2 - | 2.09 (1.50 - 2.68 ) | | | | |
| > 20 | 13.33 (8.66 - 18.01 ) | | | | |
| 1.03 (1.01 - 1.04) | < 0.001 | 1.03 (1.01 - 1.04) | < 0.001 | ||
(a) For all continuous variables, we also report categorical results to allow inspection of the data and whether or not the assumption of continuous variables was justified.
(b) Adjusted IRR was corrected for over-dispersion in multivariate analysis. § The area percentage occupied by croplands, forests or grassland, respectively.
Correlation coefficient between the monthly incidence of human brucellosis and climate variables, 2004–2010
| Inner Mongolia | L4 = −0.70 | L4 = −0.58 | L4 = −0.69 | L1 = −0.50 | L1 = 0.51 |
| Heilongjiang | L4 = −0.76 | L4 = −0.59 | L4 = −0.53 | L1 = −0.34 | L1 = 0.28 |
| Shanxi | L4 = −0.71 | L3 = −0.63 | L5 = −0.56 | L2 = −0.57 | L2 = 0.53 |
| Jilin | L4 = −0.48 | L4 = −0.39 | L4 = −0.29 | L3 = −0.36 | L1 = 0.30 |
The maximum correlation coefficient were shown in the table.
Lx: the lagged months. HS: monthly hours of sunshine; RH: average relative humidity; WV: average wind velocity.
Granger causality tests for climate variables causing the monthly incidence of human brucellosis.
| Inner Mongolia | 6.28 (< 0.001) | 1.95 (0.076) | 6.57 (< 0.001) | 1.80 (0.172) | 3.78 (0.008) |
| Heilongjiang | 6.21 (< 0.001) | 2.87 (0.021) | 3.01 (0.012) | 1.19 (0.310) | 0.97 (0.412) |
| Shanxi | 6.41 (< 0.001) | 3.60 (0.004) | 3.58 (0.003) | 1.79 (0.141) | 3.97 (0.006) |
| Jilin | 3.30 (0.010) | 3.28 (0.010) | 0.56 (0.782) | 1.98 (0.107) | 0.18 (0.833) |
The F-statistics (P-value) were shown in the table.
HS: monthly hours of sunshine; RH: average relative humidity; WV: average wind velocity.
ADL time-series regression coefficients of the temperature and HS associated with human brucellosis, 2004–2009
| Inner | Lag0 | −0.019 (−0.023 to −0.016) | −0.028 (−0.043 to −0.013) | −0.019 (−0.031 to −0.008) | 0.033 (−0.011 to 0.076) |
| Mongoliab | Lag1 | −0.019 (−0.021 to −0.017) | −0.044 (−0.055 to −0.033) | −0.015 (−0.024 to −0.006) | 0.009 (−0.024 to 0.043) |
| | Lag2 | −0.018 (−0.020 to −0.017) | −0.060 (−0.067 to −0.052) | −0.011 (−0.018 to −0.004) | −0.014 (−0.041 to 0.013) |
| | Lag3 | −0.018 (−0.020 to −0.016) | −0.076 (−0.082 to −0.069) | −0.007 (−0.013 to −0.0003) | −0.037 (−0.063 to −0.011) |
| | Lag4 | −0.017(−0.020 to −0.015) | −0.091 (−0.100 to −0.082) | −0.002 (−0.005 to −0.010) | −0.060 (−0.091 to −0.029) |
| | Lag5 | −0.017(−0.021 to −0.013) | −0.107 (−0.120 to −0.094) | 0.002 (−0.008 to 0.012) | −0.083 (−0.123 to −0.043) |
| | Constant term | 1.152 (0.946 to 1.357) | 10.738 (9.778 to 11.698) | 4.706 (1.037 to 8.374) | |
| | Incidence(−1) | 0.846 (0.795 to 0.898) | 0.822 (0.772 to 0.873) | 0.832 (0.784 to 0.880) | |
| | R-square | 0.925 | 0.926 | 0.923 | |
| | AIC | 2.088 | 2.066 | 2.219 | |
| | RMS error | 1.300 | 1.230 | 1.180 | |
| Heilongjiangc | Lag0 | −0.005 (−0.006 to −0.005) | −0.005 (−0.008 to −0.001) | −0.005 (−0.007 to −0.004) | 0.005 (−0.0003 to 0.010) |
| | Lag1 | −0.005 (−0.005 to −0.004) | −0.009 (−0.012 to −0.007) | −0.005 (−0.006 to −0.004) | 0.003 (−0.002 to 0.007) |
| | Lag2 | −0.004 (−0.005 to −0.004) | −0.014 (−0.016 to −0.012) | −0.004 (−0.005 to −0.003) | 0.001 (−0.004 to 0.005) |
| | Lag3 | −0.004 (−0.004 to −0.003) | −0.019 (−0.021 to −0.017) | −0.003 (−0.004 to −0.002) | −0.002 (−0.006 to 0.003) |
| | Lag4 | −0.003 (−0.004 to −0.002) | −0.024 (−0.027 to −0.020) | −0.002 (−0.003 to −0.002) | −0.004 (−0.009 to 0.001) |
| | Lag5 | −0.002 (−0.003 to −0.001) | - | −0.002 (−0.003 to −0.001) | - |
| | Lag6 | −0.002 (−0.003 to −0.001) | - | −0.001 (−0.002 to −0.001) | - |
| | Constant term | 0.267 (0.196 to 0.339) | 1.669 (1.494 to 1.844) | 0.206 (−0.239 to 0.650) | |
| | Incidence(−1) | 0.741 (0.659 to 0.823) | 0.776 (0.716 to 0.835) | 0.745 (0.659 to 0.830) | |
| | R-square | 0.910 | 0.880 | 0.913 | |
| | AIC | −0.969 | −0.708 | −0.938 | |
| | RMS error | 0.213 | 0.258 | 0.216 | |
| Shanxid | Lag0 | −0.007 (−0.008 to −0.005) | −0.006 (−0.010 to −0.002) | −0.003 (−0.005 to −0.0003) | −0.007 (−0.013 to −0.0004) |
| | Lag1 | −0.007 (−0.007 to −0.006) | −0.001 (−0.013 to −0.006) | −0.004 (−0.005 to −0.002) | −0.007 (−0.012 to −0.002) |
| | Lag2 | −0.006 (−0.007 to −0.005) | −0.013 (−0.015 to −0.010) | −0.005 (−0.005 to −0.004) | −0.007 (−0.011 to −0.003) |
| | Lag3 | −0.006 (−0.006 to −0.005) | −0.016 (−0.019 to −0.014) | −0.005 (−0.006 to −0.004) | −0.007 (−0.010 to −0.003) |
| | Lag4 | −0.005 (−0.006 to −0.004) | −0.020 (−0.022 to −0.017) | −0.006 (−0.008 to −0.004) | −0.007 (−0.010 to −0.003) |
| | Lag5 | −0.005 (−0.006 to −0.004) | −0.023 (−0.026 to −0.020) | −0.007 (−0.010 to −0.004) | −0.007 (−0.010 to −0.003) |
| | Lag6 | - | −0.026 (−0.031 to −0.022) | - | −0.006 (−0.011 to −0.002) |
| | Lag7 | - | −0.030 (−0.035 to −0.025) | - | −0.006 (−0.012 to −0.001) |
| | Constant term | 0.554 (0.468 to 0.640) | 3.230 (2.818 to 3.642) | 1.676 (1.16 to 2.19) | |
| | Incidence(−1) | 0.781 (0.716 to 0.846) | 0.540 (0.457 to 0.622) | 0.609 (0.519 to 0.698) | |
| | R-square | 0.893 | 0.860 | 0.903 | |
| | AIC | −0.376 | −0.104 | −0.506 | |
| | RMS error | 0.253 | 0.303 | 0.213 | |
| Jiline | Lag0 | −0.004 (−0.004 to −0.003) | | | |
| | Lag1 | −0.003 (−0.004 to −0.003) | | | |
| | Lag2 | −0.003 (−0.003 to −0.002) | | | |
| | Lag3 | −0.002 (−0.002 to −0.002) | | | |
| | Lag4 | −0.001 (−0.002 to −0.001) | | | |
| | Lag5 | −0.001 (−0.002 to −0.0001) | | | |
| | Constant term | 0.123 (0.090 to 0.157) | | | |
| | Incidence(−1) | 0.914 (0.867 to 0.962) | | | |
| | R-square | 0.894 | | | |
| | AIC | −0.800 | | | |
| RMS error | 0.376 | ||||
a. Lagx: the lagged months; HS: monthly hours of sunshine; Unit: temperature (degree centigrade), monthly hours of sunshine (10 hours).
b. The model including average wind velocity had a lower R-square (0.882) and higher RMS error (1.66) and it was not shown in the table. The purely autoregressive model had a R-square 0.788.
c. The model including rainfall had lower R-squares (0.874) and higher RMS errors (0.337) and it was not shown in the table. The purely autoregressive model had a R-square 0.714.
d. The model including rainfall or wind velocity had lower R-squares (0.859, 0.827) and higher RMS errors (0.334, 0.339) and they were not shown in the table. The purely autoregressive model had a R-square 0.753.
e. The model including rainfall had lower R-squares (0.892) and higher RMS errors (0.382) and it was not shown in the table. The purely autoregressive model had a R-square 0.818.
Figure 5Validations of ADL models of human brucellosis incidence in provinces with the highest incidences, China. A. Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, northern China; B. Shanxi Province, northern China; C. Heilongjiang Province, northeastern China; D. Jilin Province, northeastern China.