Literature DB >> 12414129

The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) brucellosis eradication program in the United States.

Valerie E Ragan1.   

Abstract

Efforts to eradicate brucellosis caused by Brucella abortus in the United States began in 1934 as part of an economic recovery program to reduce the cattle population because of the Great Depression and concurrent severe drought conditions. A number of states saw this as an opportunity to reduce the level of brucellosis, which was the most significant livestock disease problem in the US at the time. In 1934 and 1935, the reactor rate in adult cattle tested was 11.5%. In 1954, the magnitude of the brucellosis problem in the United States in terms of economics to the cattle industry and human health prompted Congress to appropriate funds for a comprehensive national effort to eradicate brucellosis. The brucellosis eradication program was designed as a cooperative effort between the federal government, the states, and livestock producers. As the science and technology of brucellosis has developed over the years through research and experience, the eradication program has been modified many times. As of 31 December 2000, there were no affected cattle herds in the United States. This was the first time in the history of the brucellosis program that the United States had no known brucellosis affected herds. However, brucellosis has a variable, sometimes quite lengthy incubation period, so it is expected that additional affected herds will be disclosed. It is likely that additional affected herds will be disclosed before brucellosis is finally eradicated from cattle. Animal health officials remain prepared to aggressively pursue any newly disclosed affected herds to eliminate the disease as quickly as possible. The State-Federal Brucellosis Eradication Program has made tremendous progress since its inception. In an eradication program, it is critically important to recognize that, despite all the tools that are available to eliminate the disease, an effective surveillance system is the critical first step that must be in place in order to be successful. It is imperative, not only to be able to find the disease and eliminate it, but to find it before it spreads to susceptible herds. When brucellosis can be identified, contained, and eliminated before spread occurs, eradication can be achieved. Copyright 2002 Elsevier Science B.V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12414129     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1135(02)00240-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Microbiol        ISSN: 0378-1135            Impact factor:   3.293


  25 in total

Review 1.  Confronting models with data: the challenges of estimating disease spillover.

Authors:  Paul C Cross; Diann J Prosser; Andrew M Ramey; Ephraim M Hanks; Kim M Pepin
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  NRAMP1 3' untranslated region polymorphisms are not associated with natural resistance to Brucella abortus in cattle.

Authors:  Tatiane A Paixão; Fernando P Poester; Alcina V Carvalho Neta; Alan M Borges; Andrey P Lage; Renato L Santos
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2007-03-12       Impact factor: 3.441

3.  Bovine brucellosis seroprevalence and flow network analysis in slaughterhouses in the state of Ceará.

Authors:  Luenny Carla Silva Dos Santos Carvalho de Araújo; Mateus Matiuzzi da Costa; João Alves do Nascimento; Francisco Dyrlley Andrade da Silva; Rodolfo de Moraes Peixoto
Journal:  Rev Bras Med Vet       Date:  2022-04-14

4.  Evolution of bovine brucellosis in Colombia over a 7-year period (2006-2012).

Authors:  Liliana Cárdenas; Oscar Melo; Jordi Casal
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 1.559

Review 5.  Brucellosis: the case for live, attenuated vaccines.

Authors:  Thomas A Ficht; Melissa M Kahl-McDonagh; Angela M Arenas-Gamboa; Allison C Rice-Ficht
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 6.  Review of brucellosis in Nepal.

Authors:  Krishna Prasad Acharya; Krishna Kaphle; Kshitiz Shrestha; Bruno Garin Bastuji; Henk L Smits
Journal:  Int J Vet Sci Med       Date:  2016-12-16

7.  Enhanced immune response of red deer (Cervus elaphus) to live rb51 vaccine strain using composite microspheres.

Authors:  Angela M Arenas-Gamboa; Thomas A Ficht; Donald S Davis; Philip H Elzer; Alfredo Wong-Gonzalez; Allison C Rice-Ficht
Journal:  J Wildl Dis       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.535

8.  Elk migration influences the risk of disease spillover in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem.

Authors:  Nathaniel D Rayl; Jerod A Merkle; Kelly M Proffitt; Emily S Almberg; Jennifer D Jones; Justin A Gude; Paul C Cross
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 5.606

9.  Laboratory-acquired brucellosis.

Authors:  Stephanie Noviello; Richard Gallo; Molly Kelly; Ronald J Limberger; Karen DeAngelis; Louise Cain; Barbara Wallace; Nellie Dumas
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.883

10.  Identification and effect decomposition of risk factors for Brucella contamination of raw whole milk in china.

Authors:  Pengbo Ning; Mancai Guo; Kangkang Guo; Lei Xu; Min Ren; Yuanyuan Cheng; Yanming Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.