Literature DB >> 24231826

[Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: from imaging to diagnosis].

M Gutberlet1.   

Abstract

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) has evolved over the past 20 years from a research-based imaging modality to an indispensable routine procedure in cardiac diagnostics. In addition to the morphological representation of cardiac anatomy, whereby only noninvasive multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) is superior, another strength of CMR is the assessment of cardiac function and tissue differentiation. This requires that the radiologist performing the examination and analyzing the results has good knowledge of cardiac and thoracic anatomy and a detailed knowledge of the various cardiovascular diseases, hemodynamics, and pathophysiology. CMR reliably allows determination of a range of easy to determine quantitative parameters such as ventricular ejection fraction and also the valvular regurgitation fraction, which allows objective assessment of cardiac function. Especially the possibility to differentiate inflamed, viable, and ischemic tissue using adenosine stress MRI in the last 10 years has led to routine use of CMR. Even compared to competing nuclear medicine procedures, CMR is important for treatment decision-making and for prognosis estimation, thus, making it an indispensable component of cardiovascular diagnostics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24231826     DOI: 10.1007/s00117-013-2533-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologe        ISSN: 0033-832X            Impact factor:   0.635


  54 in total

1.  Diagnostic performance of CMR imaging compared with EMB in patients with suspected myocarditis.

Authors:  Philipp Lurz; Ingo Eitel; Julia Adam; Julia Steiner; Matthias Grothoff; Steffen Desch; Georg Fuernau; Suzanne de Waha; Mahdi Sareban; Christian Luecke; Karin Klingel; Reinhard Kandolf; Gerhard Schuler; Matthias Gutberlet; Holger Thiele
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-05

2.  Influence of high magnetic field strengths and parallel acquisition strategies on image quality in cardiac 2D CINE magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of 1.5 T vs. 3.0 T.

Authors:  Matthias Gutberlet; Kerstin Schwinge; Patrick Freyhardt; Birgit Spors; Matthias Grothoff; Timm Denecke; Lutz Lüdemann; Ralph Noeske; Thoralf Niendorf; Roland Felix
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-05-05       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Comprehensive cardiac magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 Tesla: feasibility and implications for clinical applications.

Authors:  Matthias Gutberlet; Ralph Noeske; Kerstin Schwinge; Patrick Freyhardt; Roland Felix; Thoralf Niendorf
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 6.016

4.  Myocardial first pass perfusion imaging with gadobutrol: impact of parallel imaging algorithms on image quality and signal behavior.

Authors:  Daniel Theisen; Bernd J Wintersperger; Armin Huber; Olaf Dietrich; Maximilian F Reiser; Stefan O Schönberg
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 6.016

5.  Visual analysis of cardiac 4D MRI blood flow using line predicates.

Authors:  Silvia Born; Matthias Pfeifle; Michael Markl; Matthias Gutberlet; Gerik Scheuermann
Journal:  IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.579

6.  MR-IMPACT II: Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Myocardial Perfusion Assessment in Coronary artery disease Trial: perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance vs. single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease: a comparative multicentre, multivendor trial.

Authors:  Juerg Schwitter; Christian M Wacker; Norbert Wilke; Nidal Al-Saadi; Ekkehart Sauer; Kalman Huettle; Stefan O Schönberg; Andreas Luchner; Oliver Strohm; Hakan Ahlstrom; Thorsten Dill; Nadja Hoebel; Tamas Simor
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2012-03-04       Impact factor: 29.983

7.  Phase-sensitive inversion recovery (PSIR) single-shot TrueFISP for assessment of myocardial infarction at 3 tesla.

Authors:  Armin Huber; Kerstin Bauner; Bernd J Wintersperger; Scott B Reeder; Frank Stadie; Edgar Mueller; Michaela Schmidt; Eva Winnik; Maximilian F Reiser; Stefan O Schoenberg
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 6.016

8.  [MRI for therapy planning in patients with atrial septum defects].

Authors:  A Huber; M Prompona; R Kozlik-Feldmann; O Mühling; E Rummeny; M Reiser; D Theisen
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 0.635

9.  Hybrid cardiac imaging: SPECT/CT and PET/CT. A joint position statement by the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM), the European Society of Cardiac Radiology (ESCR) and the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology (ECNC).

Authors:  Albert Flotats; Juhani Knuuti; Matthias Gutberlet; Claudio Marcassa; Frank M Bengel; Philippe A Kaufmann; Michael R Rees; Birger Hesse
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Uptake of contrast materials by experimental acute myocardial infarctions: a preliminary report.

Authors:  C B Higgins; M Sovak; W Schmidt; P T Siemers
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1978 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.016

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.