Literature DB >> 24226243

Combined chemical defenses against an insect-fungal complex.

K D Klepzig1, E B Smalley, K F Raffa.   

Abstract

This study considered how host plant allelochemicals may contribute to defense against insects and fungi that jointly colonize the subcortical tissues of trees, the relative roles of constitutive and inducible chemistry in these defenses, and how the actions of two different feeding guilds might be interrelated. Our model consisted of the coniferous treePinus resinosa, the root- and lower stem-colonizing beetlesHylastes porculus andDendroctonus valens, and their associated fungiLeptographium procerum andL. terebrantis, and the stem-colonizing bark beetleIps pini and its associated fungusOphiostoma ips. In a novel bioassay, extracts from reaction tissue elicted by wound inoculation withL. terebrantis were more repellent to beetles than were similar extracts from constitutive or mechanically wounded tissue. The effect on beetle behavior was more pronounced in nonpolar extracts, which contain mostly monoterpenes, than in polar extracts, which contain mostly phenolics. Synthetic monoterpenes at concentrations present in the various tissues exerted similar effects and were likewise repellent in dose-response experiments. Growth ofL. procerum andL. terebrantis was inhibited by polar extracts from constitutive and reaction tissue. Inhibition was higher in wounded than control tissue, but the inhibition response did not vary with the type of wounding. Synthetic monoterpenes strongly inhibited spore germination and mycelial growth of both fungi. Colonization of red pine roots byLeptographium spp. altered the subsequent effects of extracts of stem phloem tissue onI. pini. These effects varied with host condition. Beetles preferred extracts from constitutive stem phloem tissue of healthy trees to that of root-diseased trees. However, extracts from reaction tissues of healthy trees were more repellent toI. pini than were the reaction tissues of root-diseased trees. The implications of these results to plant defense against insect-fungal complexes and interactions among different feeding guilds are discussed.

Entities:  

Year:  1996        PMID: 24226243     DOI: 10.1007/BF02027719

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Ecol        ISSN: 0098-0331            Impact factor:   2.626


  8 in total

1.  Influence of oleoresin constituents fromPinus ponderosa andPinus jeffreyi on growth of mycangial fungi fromDendroctonus ponderosae andDendroctonus jeffreyi.

Authors:  T D Paine; C C Hanlon
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Chemical barriers to adaptation by a specialist herbivore.

Authors:  M R Berenbaum; A R Zangerl; K Lee
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Generalized plant defense: effects on multiple species.

Authors:  Vera A Krischik; Robert W Goth; Pedro Barbosa
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Growth of wood-inhabiting fungi in saturated atmospheres of monoterpenoids.

Authors:  R C De Groot
Journal:  Mycologia       Date:  1972 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.696

5.  Defense mechanisms of conifers : relationship of monoterpene cyclase activity to anatomical specialization and oleoresin monoterpene content.

Authors:  E Lewinsohn; M Gijzen; T J Savage; R Croteau
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  Interaction of pre-attack and induced monoterpene concentrations in host conifer defense against bark beetle-fungal complexes.

Authors:  Kenneth F Raffa; Eugene B Smalley
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Effects of biotic and abiotic stress on induced accumulation of terpenes and phenolics in red pines inoculated with bark beetle-vectored fungus.

Authors:  K D Klepzig; E L Kruger; E B Smalley; K F Raffa
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  Defensive mechanisms of loblolly and shortleaf pine against attack by southern pine beetle,Dendroctonus frontalis Zimmermann, and its fungal associate,Ceratocystis minor (Hedgecock) Hunt.

Authors:  S P Cook; F P Hain
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 2.626

  8 in total
  22 in total

1.  Fire injury reduces inducible defenses of lodgepole pine against Mountain pine beetle.

Authors:  Erinn N Powell; Kenneth F Raffa
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Contrasting Patterns of Diterpene Acid Induction by Red Pine and White Spruce to Simulated Bark Beetle Attack, and Interspecific Differences in Sensitivity Among Fungal Associates.

Authors:  Charles J Mason; Kier D Klepzig; Brian J Kopper; Philip J Kersten; Barbara L Illman; Kenneth F Raffa
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2015-05-24       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 3.  Terpenes tell different tales at different scales: glimpses into the Chemical Ecology of conifer - bark beetle - microbial interactions.

Authors:  Kenneth F Raffa
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Isolation, Expression Profiling, and Regulation via Host Allelochemicals of 16 Glutathione S-Transferases in the Chinese White Pine Beetle, Dendroctonus armandi.

Authors:  Haiming Gao; Lulu Dai; Danyang Fu; Yaya Sun; Hui Chen
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 4.566

5.  Responses of bark beetle-associated bacteria to host monoterpenes and their relationship to insect life histories.

Authors:  Aaron S Adams; Celia K Boone; Jörg Bohlmann; Kenneth F Raffa
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Effect of water stress and fungal inoculation on monoterpene emission from an historical and a new pine host of the mountain pine beetle.

Authors:  Inka Lusebrink; Maya L Evenden; F Guillaume Blanchet; Janice E K Cooke; Nadir Erbilgin
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2011-08-27       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  Influence of fungal infection and wounding on contents and enantiomeric compositions of monoterpenes in phloem of Pinus sylvestris.

Authors:  Jenny Fäldt; Halvor Solheim; Bo Långström; Anna-Karin Borg-Karlson
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2006-08-02       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  Comparing the variation of needle and wood terpenoids in Scots pine provenances.

Authors:  A M Manninen; S Tarhanen; M Vuorinen; P Kainulaine
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  Feeding response of Ips paraconfusus to phloem and phloem metabolites of Heterobasidion annosum-inoculated ponderosa pine, Pinus ponderosa.

Authors:  William R McNee; Pierluigi Bonello; Andrew J Storer; David L Wood; Thomas R Gordon
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.626

10.  Systemic effects of Heterobasidion annosum on ferulic acid glucoside and lignin of presymptomatic ponderosa pine phloem, and potential effects on bark-beetle-associated fungi.

Authors:  Pierluigi Bonello; Andrew J Storer; Thomas R Gordon; David L Wood; Werner Heller
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.626

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.