Literature DB >> 22076685

Fire injury reduces inducible defenses of lodgepole pine against Mountain pine beetle.

Erinn N Powell1, Kenneth F Raffa.   

Abstract

We examined the effect of wildfire injury on lodgepole pine chemical defenses against mountain pine beetle. We compared the constitutive phloem chemistry among uninjured, lightly-, moderately-, and severely-injured trees, and the induced chemistry elicited by simulated beetle attack, among these same categories. We also compared the entry rates of caged female beetles into trees of these categories. The volatiles we studied included thirteen monoterpene hydrocarbons, four allylic monoterpene alcohols, one ester, and one phenyl propanoid, of which the monoterpene hydrocarbons always comprised 96% or more of the total. Fire injury reduced the total concentration of these compounds in the induced but not constitutive phloem tissue of lodgepole pines. Fire injury also affected the relative composition of some volatiles in both induced and constitutive phloem. For example, increased fire injury reduced 4-allylanisole, a host compound that inhibits mountain pine beetle aggregation. Increased fire injury also increased (-) α-pinene, which can serve as precursor of pheromone communication. However, it also reduced myrcene and terpinolene, which can serve as stimulants and synergists of pheromone communication. Beetle entry did not show statistical differences among fire injury categories, although there was a trend to increased entry with fire injury. These results suggest that the reduced ability of trees to mobilize induced chemical defenses is an important mechanism behind the higher incidence of attack on fire-injured trees in the field. Future studies should concentrate on whether beetles that enter fire-injured trees are more likely to elicit aggregation, based on the differences we observed in volatile composition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22076685     DOI: 10.1007/s10886-011-0031-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Ecol        ISSN: 0098-0331            Impact factor:   2.626


  15 in total

1.  Warming and earlier spring increase western U.S. forest wildfire activity.

Authors:  A L Westerling; H G Hidalgo; D R Cayan; T W Swetnam
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-07-06       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Combined chemical defenses against an insect-fungal complex.

Authors:  K D Klepzig; E B Smalley; K F Raffa
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Old substrates for new enzymes of terpenoid biosynthesis.

Authors:  Jörg Bohlmann; Jonathan Gershenzon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Genes, enzymes and chemicals of terpenoid diversity in the constitutive and induced defence of conifers against insects and pathogens.

Authors:  Christopher I Keeling; Jörg Bohlmann
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 10.151

Review 5.  Anatomical and chemical defenses of conifer bark against bark beetles and other pests.

Authors:  Vincent R Franceschi; Paal Krokene; Erik Christiansen; Trygve Krekling
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 10.151

6.  Genome and transcriptome analyses of the mountain pine beetle-fungal symbiont Grosmannia clavigera, a lodgepole pine pathogen.

Authors:  Scott DiGuistini; Ye Wang; Nancy Y Liao; Greg Taylor; Philippe Tanguay; Nicolas Feau; Bernard Henrissat; Simon K Chan; Uljana Hesse-Orce; Sepideh Massoumi Alamouti; Clement K M Tsui; Roderick T Docking; Anthony Levasseur; Sajeet Haridas; Gordon Robertson; Inanc Birol; Robert A Holt; Marco A Marra; Richard C Hamelin; Martin Hirst; Steven J M Jones; Jörg Bohlmann; Colette Breuil
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Interaction of pre-attack and induced monoterpene concentrations in host conifer defense against bark beetle-fungal complexes.

Authors:  Kenneth F Raffa; Eugene B Smalley
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Fire, fungi, and beetle influences on a lodgepole pine ecosystem of south-central Oregon.

Authors:  D R Geiszler; R I Gara; C H Driver; V F Gallucci; R E Martin
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 9.  Terpenoid biosynthesis and specialized vascular cells of conifer defense.

Authors:  Katherine G Zulak; Jörg Bohlmann
Journal:  J Integr Plant Biol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 7.061

10.  Mountain pine beetle and forest carbon feedback to climate change.

Authors:  W A Kurz; C C Dymond; G Stinson; G J Rampley; E T Neilson; A L Carroll; T Ebata; L Safranyik
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Terpenes tell different tales at different scales: glimpses into the Chemical Ecology of conifer - bark beetle - microbial interactions.

Authors:  Kenneth F Raffa
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Temperature-driven range expansion of an irruptive insect heightened by weakly coevolved plant defenses.

Authors:  Kenneth F Raffa; Erinn N Powell; Philip A Townsend
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-12-31       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Constitutive and Induced Defenses in Long-lived Pines Do Not Trade Off but Are Influenced by Climate.

Authors:  Justin B Runyon; Barbara J Bentz; Claire A Qubain
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 2.793

4.  Hydrological modelling for siberian crane Grus Leucogeranus stopover sites in northeast China.

Authors:  Haibo Jiang; Chunguang He; Lianxi Sheng; Zhanhui Tang; Yang Wen; Tingting Yan; Changlin Zou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Mountain Pine Beetle Dynamics and Reproductive Success in Post-Fire Lodgepole and Ponderosa Pine Forests in Northeastern Utah.

Authors:  Andrew P Lerch; Jesse A Pfammatter; Barbara J Bentz; Kenneth F Raffa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Defense traits in the long-lived Great Basin bristlecone pine and resistance to the native herbivore mountain pine beetle.

Authors:  Barbara J Bentz; Sharon M Hood; E Matthew Hansen; James C Vandygriff; Karen E Mock
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 10.151

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.