Literature DB >> 28306839

Interaction of pre-attack and induced monoterpene concentrations in host conifer defense against bark beetle-fungal complexes.

Kenneth F Raffa1, Eugene B Smalley2.   

Abstract

Two pine species (Pinus resinosa, P. banksiana) responded to inoculation with fungi carried by bark beetles by rapidly increasing monoterpene concentrations at the entry site. Changes in total monoterpenes were more pronounced than changes in proportionate compositions. The extent and rate of host response was affected by fungal species, the viability of the inoculum, and host tree species. In general, host responses were highest to fungi that are phytopathogenic and consistently associated with the major bark beetles in the study region. Simple mechanical wounding cannot account for the observed allelochemical changes, as aseptic inoculations elicited only minor reactions. Similarly, inoculation with autoclaved inviable fungi generally elicited intermediate responses, suggesting that both structural and metabolic fungal properties are important. Responses by jack pine, P. banksiana, were generally more rapid and variable than those of red pine, P. resinosa. Dose-toxicity experiments with synthetic compounds demonstrated that monoterpene concentrations present in vivo only a few days after simulated attack are lethal to most beetles. Constitutive (pre-attack) monoterpene levels can also exert some toxicity. Because bark beetles engage in pheromone-mediated mass attacks that can deplete host defenses, constitutive monoterpene levels, while a necessary early phase of successful plant defense, appear insufficient by themselves. Such interactions between constitutive and induced defense chemistry may be important considerations when evaluating general theories of plant defense.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bark beetles; Induced resistance; Insect-fungal interactions; Plant-insect interactions; Terpenes

Year:  1995        PMID: 28306839     DOI: 10.1007/BF00329795

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  8 in total

1.  Defense mechanisms of conifers : differences in constitutive and wound-induced monoterpene biosynthesis among species.

Authors:  E Lewinsohn; M Gijzen; R Croteau
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Attraction to pheromone sources of different quantity, quality, and spacing: Density-regulation mechanisms in bark beetleIps typographus.

Authors:  F Schlyter; J A Byers; J Löfqvist
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Plant chemical defense: monoterpenes and the growth-differentiation balance hypothesis.

Authors:  M Lerdau; M Litvak; R Monson
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Lack of induced chemical defense in juvenile Alaskan woody plants in response to simulated browsing.

Authors:  F Stuart Chapin; John P Bryant; John F Fox
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Fungi associated with the southern pine beetle: avoidance of induced defense response in loblolly pine.

Authors:  T D Paine; F M Stephen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Defensive mechanisms of loblolly and shortleaf pine against attack by southern pine beetle,Dendroctonus frontalis Zimmermann, and its fungal associate,Ceratocystis minor (Hedgecock) Hunt.

Authors:  S P Cook; F P Hain
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  Higher plant terpenoids: A phytocentric overview of their ecological roles.

Authors:  J H Langenheim
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  Computation of response factors for quantitative analysis of monoterpenes by gas-liquid chromatography.

Authors:  K F Raffa; R J Steffeck
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 2.626

  8 in total
  41 in total

1.  Induced chemical defenses in a freshwater macrophyte suppress herbivore fitness and the growth of associated microbes.

Authors:  Wendy E Morrison; Mark E Hay
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Fire injury reduces inducible defenses of lodgepole pine against Mountain pine beetle.

Authors:  Erinn N Powell; Kenneth F Raffa
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Oleoresin chemistry mediates oviposition behavior and fecundity of a tree-killing bark beetle.

Authors:  Thomas S Davis; Richard W Hofstetter
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Microbial impacts on plant-herbivore interactions: the indirect effects of a birch pathogen on a birch aphid.

Authors:  Scott N Johnson; Angela E Douglas; Stephen Woodward; Susan E Hartley
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-01-09       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 5.  The bark beetle holobiont: why microbes matter.

Authors:  Diana L Six
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Combined chemical defenses against an insect-fungal complex.

Authors:  K D Klepzig; E B Smalley; K F Raffa
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  Contrasting Patterns of Diterpene Acid Induction by Red Pine and White Spruce to Simulated Bark Beetle Attack, and Interspecific Differences in Sensitivity Among Fungal Associates.

Authors:  Charles J Mason; Kier D Klepzig; Brian J Kopper; Philip J Kersten; Barbara L Illman; Kenneth F Raffa
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2015-05-24       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  Inducibility of chemical defenses in Norway spruce bark is correlated with unsuccessful mass attacks by the spruce bark beetle.

Authors:  Christian Schiebe; Almuth Hammerbacher; Göran Birgersson; Johanna Witzell; Peter E Brodelius; Jonathan Gershenzon; Bill S Hansson; Paal Krokene; Fredrik Schlyter
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Bacteria influence mountain pine beetle brood development through interactions with symbiotic and antagonistic fungi: implications for climate-driven host range expansion.

Authors:  Janet Therrien; Charles J Mason; Jonathan A Cale; Aaron Adams; Brian H Aukema; Cameron R Currie; Kenneth F Raffa; Nadir Erbilgin
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Chemical analysis of volatiles emitted by Pinus svlvestris after induction by insect oviposition.

Authors:  Roland Mumm; Kai Schrank; Robert Wegener; Stefan Schulz; Monika Hilker
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.626

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.