Literature DB >> 21874397

Effect of water stress and fungal inoculation on monoterpene emission from an historical and a new pine host of the mountain pine beetle.

Inka Lusebrink1, Maya L Evenden, F Guillaume Blanchet, Janice E K Cooke, Nadir Erbilgin.   

Abstract

The mountain pine beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae, MPB) has killed millions of lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) trees in Western Canada, and recent range expansion has resulted in attack of jack pine (Pinus banksiana) in Alberta. Establishment of MPB in the Boreal forest will require use of jack pine under a suite of environmental conditions different from those it typically encounters in its native range. Lodgepole and jack pine seedlings were grown under controlled environment conditions and subjected to either water deficit or well watered conditions and inoculated with Grosmannia clavigera, a MPB fungal associate. Soil water content, photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, and emission of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were monitored over the duration of the six-week study. Monoterpene content of bark and needle tissue was measured at the end of the experiment. β-Phellandrene, the major monoterpene in lodgepole pine, was almost completely lacking in the volatile emission profile of jack pine. The major compound in jack pine was α-pinene. The emission of both compounds was positively correlated with stomatal conductance. 3-Carene was emitted at a high concentration from jack pine seedlings, which is in contrast to monoterpene profiles of jack pine from more southern and eastern parts of its range. Fungal inoculation caused a significant increase in total monoterpene emission in water deficit lodgepole pine seedlings right after its application. By 4 weeks into the experiment, water deficit seedlings of both species released significantly lower levels of total monoterpenes than well watered seedlings. Needle tissue contained lower total monoterpene content than bark. Generally, monoterpene tissue content increased over time independent from any treatment. The results suggest that monoterpenes that play a role in pine-MPB interactions differ between lodgepole and jack pine, and also that they are affected by water availability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21874397     DOI: 10.1007/s10886-011-0008-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Ecol        ISSN: 0098-0331            Impact factor:   2.626


  22 in total

1.  Antimicrobial terpenes from oleoresin of ponderosa pine treePinus ponderosa: A defense mechanism against microbial invasion.

Authors:  M Himejima; K R Hobson; T Otsuka; D L Wood; I Kubo
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Combined chemical defenses against an insect-fungal complex.

Authors:  K D Klepzig; E B Smalley; K F Raffa
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Explaining evolution of plant communication by airborne signals.

Authors:  Martin Heil; Richard Karban
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  MONOTERPENE VARIATION IN PONDEROSA PINE XYLEM RESIN RELATED TO WESTERN PINE BEETLE PREDATION.

Authors:  Kareen B Sturgeon
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 5.  Genes, enzymes and chemicals of terpenoid diversity in the constitutive and induced defence of conifers against insects and pathogens.

Authors:  Christopher I Keeling; Jörg Bohlmann
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 10.151

Review 6.  Anatomical and chemical defenses of conifer bark against bark beetles and other pests.

Authors:  Vincent R Franceschi; Paal Krokene; Erik Christiansen; Trygve Krekling
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 10.151

7.  Analysis of defensive responses activated by volatile allo-ocimene treatment in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Kyutaro Kishimoto; Kenji Matsui; Rika Ozawa; Junji Takabayashi
Journal:  Phytochemistry       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 4.072

8.  Variation in complex semiochemical signals arising from insects and host plants.

Authors:  Brian H Aukema; Jaimie S Powell; Murray K Clayton; Kenneth F Raffa
Journal:  Environ Entomol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.377

9.  β-Phellandrene: kairomone for pine engraver,Ips pini (Say) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae).

Authors:  D R Miller; J H Borden
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 2.626

10.  Sensitivity of terpene emissions to drought and fertilization in terpene-storing Pinus halepensis and non-storing Quercus ilex.

Authors:  Josep-Salvador Blanch; Josep Peñuelas; Joan Llusià
Journal:  Physiol Plant       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.500

View more
  12 in total

1.  Mountain pine beetles colonizing historical and naive host trees are associated with a bacterial community highly enriched in genes contributing to terpene metabolism.

Authors:  Aaron S Adams; Frank O Aylward; Sandye M Adams; Nadir Erbilgin; Brian H Aukema; Cameron R Currie; Garret Suen; Kenneth F Raffa
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-03-29       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  The lodgepole × jack pine hybrid zone in Alberta, Canada: a stepping stone for the mountain pine beetle on its journey East across the boreal forest?

Authors:  Inka Lusebrink; Nadir Erbilgin; Maya L Evenden
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2013-08-17       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  A Native Parasitic Plant Systemically Induces Resistance in Jack Pine to a Fungal Symbiont of Invasive Mountain Pine Beetle.

Authors:  Jennifer G Klutsch; Ahmed Najar; Patrick Sherwood; Pierluigi Bonello; Nadir Erbilgin
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Pheromone Production by an Invasive Bark Beetle Varies with Monoterpene Composition of its Naïve Host.

Authors:  Spencer Taft; Ahmed Najar; Nadir Erbilgin
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Direction of interaction between mountain pine beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae) and resource-sharing wood-boring beetles depends on plant parasite infection.

Authors:  Jennifer G Klutsch; Ahmed Najar; Jonathan A Cale; Nadir Erbilgin
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  "Help is in the air": volatiles from salt-stressed plants increase the reproductive success of receivers under salinity.

Authors:  Marco Landi; Fabrizio Araniti; Guido Flamini; Ermes Lo Piccolo; Alice Trivellini; Maria Rosa Abenavoli; Lucia Guidi
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 4.116

7.  Variations in foliar monoterpenes across the range of jack pine reveal three widespread chemotypes: implications to host expansion of invasive mountain pine beetle.

Authors:  Spencer Taft; Ahmed Najar; Julie Godbout; Jean Bousquet; Nadir Erbilgin
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 5.753

8.  Influence of water deficit on the molecular responses of Pinus contorta × Pinus banksiana mature trees to infection by the mountain pine beetle fungal associate, Grosmannia clavigera.

Authors:  Adriana Arango-Velez; Leonardo M Galindo González; Miranda J Meents; Walid El Kayal; Barry J Cooke; Jean Linsky; Inka Lusebrink; Janice E K Cooke
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 4.196

9.  Characterizing the physical and genetic structure of the lodgepole pine × jack pine hybrid zone: mosaic structure and differential introgression.

Authors:  Catherine I Cullingham; Patrick M A James; Janice E K Cooke; David W Coltman
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 5.183

10.  Transcriptome resources and functional characterization of monoterpene synthases for two host species of the mountain pine beetle, lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) and jack pine (Pinus banksiana).

Authors:  Dawn E Hall; Macaire M S Yuen; Sharon Jancsik; Alfonso Lara Quesada; Harpreet K Dullat; Maria Li; Hannah Henderson; Adriana Arango-Velez; Nancy Y Liao; Roderick T Docking; Simon K Chan; Janice Ek Cooke; Colette Breuil; Steven Jm Jones; Christopher I Keeling; Jörg Bohlmann
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 4.215

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.