Literature DB >> 21710365

Responses of bark beetle-associated bacteria to host monoterpenes and their relationship to insect life histories.

Aaron S Adams1, Celia K Boone, Jörg Bohlmann, Kenneth F Raffa.   

Abstract

Bark beetles that colonize living conifers and their microbial associates encounter constitutive and induced chemical defenses of their host. Monoterpene hydrocarbons comprise a major component of these allelochemicals, and many are antibiotic to insects, fungi, and bacteria. Some bark beetle species exhaust these defenses by killing their host through mass attacks mediated by aggregation pheromones. Others lack adult aggregation pheromones and do not engage in pheromone-mediated mass attacks, but rather have the ability to complete development within live hosts. In the former species, the larvae develop in tissue largely depleted of host terpenes, whereas in the latter exposure to these compounds persists throughout development. A substantial literature exists on how monoterpenes affect bark beetles and their associated fungi, but little is known of how they affect bacteria, which in turn can influence beetle performance in various manners. We tested several bacteria from two bark beetle species for their ability to grow in the presence of a diversity of host monoterpenes. Bacteria were isolated from the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins, which typically kills trees during colonization, and the red turpentine beetle, Dendroctonus valens LeConte, which often lives in their host without causing mortality. Bacteria from D. ponderosae were gram-positive Actinobacteria and Bacilli; one yeast also was tested. Bacteria from D. valens were Actinobacteria, Bacilli, and γ-Proteobacteria. Bacteria from D. valens were more tolerant of monoterpenes than were those from D. ponderosae. Bacteria from D. ponderosae did not grow in the presence of α-pinene and 3-carene, and grew in, but were inhibited by, β-pinene and β-phellandrene. Limonene and myrcene had little inhibitory effect on bacteria from either beetle species. Tolerance to these antibiotic compounds appears to have resulted from adaptation to living in a terpene-rich environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21710365     DOI: 10.1007/s10886-011-9992-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Ecol        ISSN: 0098-0331            Impact factor:   2.626


  31 in total

1.  Interactions among Scolytid bark beetles, their associated fungi, and live host conifers.

Authors:  T D Paine; K F Raffa; T C Harrington
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 19.686

2.  Combined chemical defenses against an insect-fungal complex.

Authors:  K D Klepzig; E B Smalley; K F Raffa
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  MONOTERPENE VARIATION IN PONDEROSA PINE XYLEM RESIN RELATED TO WESTERN PINE BEETLE PREDATION.

Authors:  Kareen B Sturgeon
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Whitebark pine vulnerability to climate-driven mountain pine beetle disturbance in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem.

Authors:  Jesse A Logan; William W MacFarlane; Louisa Willcox
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.657

5.  Geographic variation in bacterial communities associated with the red turpentine beetle (Coleoptera: Curculionidae).

Authors:  Aaron S Adams; Sandye M Adams; Cameron R Currie; Nancy E Gillette; Kenneth F Raffa
Journal:  Environ Entomol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.377

6.  Complex interactions among host pines and fungi vectored by an invasive bark beetle.

Authors:  Min Lu; Michael J Wingfield; Nancy E Gillette; Sylvia R Mori; Jiang-Hua Sun
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 10.151

7.  Bacterial protection of beetle-fungus mutualism.

Authors:  Jarrod J Scott; Dong-Chan Oh; M Cetin Yuceer; Kier D Klepzig; Jon Clardy; Cameron R Currie
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-10-03       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Bacterial community and nitrogen fixation in the red turpentine beetle, Dendroctonus valens LeConte (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae).

Authors:  Jesús Morales-Jiménez; Gerardo Zúñiga; Lourdes Villa-Tanaca; César Hernández-Rodríguez
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2009-06-20       Impact factor: 4.552

9.  Chiral specificity in responses by the bark beetleDendroctonus valens to host kairomones.

Authors:  K R Hobson; D L Wood; L G Cool; P R White; T Ohtsuka; I Kubo; E Zavarin
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 2.626

10.  Oxygenated monoterpenes produced by yeasts, isolated fromIps typographus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) and grown in phloem medium.

Authors:  A Leufvén; G Bergström; E Falsen
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 2.626

View more
  32 in total

Review 1.  The bark beetle holobiont: why microbes matter.

Authors:  Diana L Six
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Contrasting Patterns of Diterpene Acid Induction by Red Pine and White Spruce to Simulated Bark Beetle Attack, and Interspecific Differences in Sensitivity Among Fungal Associates.

Authors:  Charles J Mason; Kier D Klepzig; Brian J Kopper; Philip J Kersten; Barbara L Illman; Kenneth F Raffa
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2015-05-24       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Bacteria influence mountain pine beetle brood development through interactions with symbiotic and antagonistic fungi: implications for climate-driven host range expansion.

Authors:  Janet Therrien; Charles J Mason; Jonathan A Cale; Aaron Adams; Brian H Aukema; Cameron R Currie; Kenneth F Raffa; Nadir Erbilgin
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Bacteria associated with a tree-killing insect reduce concentrations of plant defense compounds.

Authors:  Celia K Boone; Ken Keefover-Ring; Abigail C Mapes; Aaron S Adams; Jörg Bohlmann; Kenneth F Raffa
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 5.  Terpenes tell different tales at different scales: glimpses into the Chemical Ecology of conifer - bark beetle - microbial interactions.

Authors:  Kenneth F Raffa
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Mountain pine beetles colonizing historical and naive host trees are associated with a bacterial community highly enriched in genes contributing to terpene metabolism.

Authors:  Aaron S Adams; Frank O Aylward; Sandye M Adams; Nadir Erbilgin; Brian H Aukema; Cameron R Currie; Garret Suen; Kenneth F Raffa
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-03-29       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Plant-associated bacteria degrade defense chemicals and reduce their adverse effects on an insect defoliator.

Authors:  Charles J Mason; John J Couture; Kenneth F Raffa
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Interactions between Bacteria And Aspen Defense Chemicals at the Phyllosphere - Herbivore Interface.

Authors:  Charles J Mason; Tiffany M Lowe-Power; Kennedy F Rubert-Nason; Richard L Lindroth; Kenneth F Raffa
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  Gut-associated bacteria throughout the life cycle of the bark beetle Dendroctonus rhizophagus Thomas and Bright (Curculionidae: Scolytinae) and their cellulolytic activities.

Authors:  Jesús Morales-Jiménez; Gerardo Zúñiga; Hugo C Ramírez-Saad; César Hernández-Rodríguez
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 4.552

10.  Inter-trophic Interaction of Gut Microbiota in a Tripartite System.

Authors:  Xianfeng Yi; Jiawei Guo; Minghui Wang; Chao Xue; Mengyao Ju
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2020-11-14       Impact factor: 4.552

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.