| Literature DB >> 24223901 |
Tao Zhan1, Kai Zhang, Yangyan Chen, Yongjun Lin, Gaobing Wu, Lili Zhang, Pei Yao, Zongze Shao, Ziduo Liu.
Abstract
Glyphosate, a broaEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24223901 PMCID: PMC3818420 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079175
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Bacterial strains, bacteriophage and plasmids used in the study.
| Strains, bacteriophage and plasmids | Characteristics | Source |
|---|---|---|
|
| Glyphosate-degrading | Lab collection |
|
| Host of gene cloning and mutant library | Lab collection |
|
| Host of protein expression | Lab collection |
| Bacteriophage T7 | Linear double-stranded DNA | Lab collection |
| pGEX-6P-1 | Expression vector, AmpR | Lab collection |
| pGEX-6P-BceGO | GO cloned from | This work |
| pGEX-6P-B3S1 | Evolved GO from screened | This work |
Amino acid substitutions of BceGO variants obtained by random mutagenesis, site directed mutagenesis, DNA shuffling and screening for enhanced specific activity on glyphosate.
| Method | Mutant | Amino acid substitution |
|---|---|---|
| First round error-prone PCR | 22D11 | G51R |
| 23B1 | D60G | |
| Site directed mutagenesis | B1R | G51R, D60G |
| Second round error-prone PCR | B2R3 | G51R, D60G, I111T, I284L, Q346R |
| B2R6 | G51R, D60G, D121G, S122P | |
| B2R11 | G51R, D60G, K133R, V262I | |
| B2R14 | G51R, D60G, T118A, K133R | |
| B2R23 | G51R, G60S, I198V, E357G | |
| B2R81 | G51R, G60S, S210P, M267T | |
| Third round DNA shuffling | B3S1 | G51R, G60S, T118A, K133R, I198V, V262I, I284L, L307S, E357G |
| B3S4 | G51R, G60S, D121G, S122P, H164Y, M267T | |
| B3S6 | G51R, G60S, K133R, S210P, R250G, V262I | |
| B3S7 | G51R, D60G, T118A, K133R, I284L |
The apparent kinetic parameters on glycine and glyphosate measured for wild-type BceGO and variants obtained by random mutagenesis, site saturation mutagenesis and DNA shuffling.
| Glycine | Glyphosate | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Wild-type | 8.17 ± 0.31 | 1.04 ± 0.17 | 5.72 ± 0.42 | 84.79 ± 4.25 |
| 22D11 | 1.16 ± 0.05 | 54.6 ± 3.47 | 2.95 ± 0.21 | 8.29 ± 0.27 |
| 23B1 | 4.56 ± 0.38 | 0.99 ± 0.04 | 7.15 ± 0.62 | 18.88 ± 2.52 |
| B1R | 0.44 ± 0.03 | 58.5 ± 5. 26 | 2.78 ± 0.46 | 2.45 ± 0.15 |
| B2R11 | 1.86 ± 0.09 | 105.6 ± 7.31 | 3.83 ± 0.17 | 2.77 ± 0.21 |
| B2R14 | 1.35 ± 0.12 | 92.5 ± 7. 43 | 4.16 ± 0.14 | 2.17 ± 0.37 |
| B2R23 | 13.02 ± 0.96 | 101.8 ± 8.29 | 30.80 ± 1.33 | 3.80 ± 0.26 |
| B2R81 | 5.41 ± 0.83 | 134.4 ± 10.33 | 7.27 ± 0.75 | 4.37 ± 0.30 |
| B3S1 | 5.43 ± 0.79 | 41.55 ± 3.32 | 11.67 ± 0.98 | 0.53 ± 0.03 |
| B3S4 | 5.68 ± 0.64 | 80.43 ± 5.01 | 12.99 ± 1.14 | 1.37 ± 0.07 |
| B3S6 | 10.14 ± 1.32 | 138.1 ± 12.16 | 13.22 ± 1.78 | 1.69 ± 0.08 |
| B3S7 | 2.30 ± 0.31 | 41.64 ± 2.10 | 4.63 ± 0.39 | 0.57 ± 0.02 |
Figure 1Comparison of catalytic efficiency (the ratios of k cat/K m) of wild-type BceGO and evolved variants.
Specific activities of wild-type BceGO and variant B3S1 toward four substrates.
| Specific activity (U/mg)[ | ||
|---|---|---|
| Substrate | BceGO | B3S1 |
| Glycine | 0.28 ± 0.05[ | 0.14 ± 0.02 |
| Glyphosate | 0.12 ± 0.02 | 0.24 ± 0.04 |
| Sarcosine | 0.83 ± 0.03 | 0.12 ± 0.02 |
| D-alanine | 0.22 ± 0.03 | 0.14 ± 0.02 |
aEnzyme assay was performed in 50 mM disodum pyrophosphate buffer at pH 8.5. One unit of specific activity was defined as the amount of enzyme converting 1 µmol of substrate per minute at 25°C.
bSDs are shown after the specific activities.
Figure 2Effect of pH and temperature on activity and stability of wild-type BceGO and evolved variant B3S1.
A. The optimal pH. Enzyme activity was determined with 100 mM glyphosate at 25 °C and within a pH gradient range of 4.0~11.0 with the following buffers: 0.2 mM Na2HPO4-0.1 mM citric acid buffer for pH 4.0~8.0, and 50 mM sodium pyrophosphate buffer for pH 8.0~11.0. The maximum activity observed was taken as 100%. B. The pH stability. Enzymes were incubated at 0 °C for 6 h over a pH buffer range of 4.0~11.0, then the enzyme activity was determined with 100 mM glyphosate at 25 °C and the optimal pH. The maximum activity observed was taken as 100%. C. The optimal temperature. The enzymes were added to the reaction mixture and the reaction was carried out at an indicated temperature from 0 to 70 °C. Then the enzyme activity was determined with 100 mM glyphosate at 25 °C and the optimal pH. The maximum activity observed was taken as 100%. D. The temperature stability. Enzymes were incubated for 1h at indicated temperature from 0 to 70 °C and then the enzyme activity was determined with 100 mM glyphosate at 25 °C and in the optimal pH. The activity without treatment was taken as 100%. Error bars represent the SD of the mean calculated for three replicates. Solid dots represent wild-type BceGO, solid blocks represent variant B3S1.
Figure 3A. Docking analysis of glyphosate-B3S1 complex. The atoms of the nine amino acid mutations are shown with stick representation. The flavin cofactor is in yellow and the ligand glyphosate is shown with ball-and-stick representation. B. The model of variant B3S1 active site docking with the substrate glyphosate. The partial accessible space of the active site is shown in green and purple. The main active residues are shown with stick representation, and hydrogen bonds are represented in yellow dotted lines. C. 2D depiction of the glyphosate-residues interaction in variant B3S1. The schematic representation was generated using MOE and the residues are shown in purple disks. The hydrogen bonds are represented in green dotted lines with the arrow denoting the direction of the bond. The solvent-exposed surface of catalytic residues is drawn as a halo-like disk around the residue. The solvent exposure of ligand is expressed in contour dotted line, and the solvent exposure of substitution group is shown in blue smudge.